Audited 29 Jul 2026·Last updated 28 Oct 2026·6 citations·Tier 1·0 uses

CAC Calculator — Customer Acquisition Cost

Work out customer acquisition cost on a blended or paid-only basis from channel spend and new-customer counts, with the spend and customers divided shown.

CAC Calculator

Which CAC do you want?
Everything you can attribute to paid acquisition for the period: media and ad spend, agency fees, affiliate and referral bounties, acquisition discounts and credits, and the loaded cost of salespeople who work only paid leads.
$
Acquisition cost you cannot attribute to a paid channel: brand and content marketing, PR, events, marketing tooling, and sales headcount that works inbound. Bessemer also puts the sales-linked share of customer success here; the plain S&M line item does not.
$
Customers, not signups, trials, leads or conversions. Count only those who started paying in this period and were attributed to a paid channel.
New paying customers in the same period with no paid attribution — word of mouth, direct, SEO, referrals from existing users. Leave at 0 if you cannot separate them; blended CAC then divides all acquisition cost by the paid customers alone, and equals paid CAC only if other acquisition cost is also 0.
Customer acquisition cost
$150.00
Acquisition cost per new customer in dollars, on the blended or paid basis you selected.
Numerator used
$60,000.00
Denominator used
400
Total acquisition spend
$60,000.00
Total new customers
400
Organic share of customers
37.50%
Basis
Blended basis — all spend ÷ all new customers

Background.

A founder tells her board that each new customer cost $150 last quarter. A week later her head of growth tells investors the figure is $160. Both are right. The founder divided all $60,000 of acquisition spend by all 400 new customers; the growth lead divided the $40,000 spent on paid channels by the 250 customers those channels brought in. Customer acquisition cost is a ratio with no official definition, so the first thing to ask of any CAC figure is what went into the top and the bottom of it.

No accounting standard defines CAC and no regulator prescribes it, and the definitions people cite most often disagree on scope. David Skok divides the sales and marketing expense line by the number of new customers. Andreessen Horowitz calls it "the full cost of acquiring users, stated on a per user basis" and insists on including referral fees, credits and acquisition discounts, which usually sit outside that expense line. Bessemer Venture Partners reaches wider still, counting sales compensation, content and brand marketing, demand generation and the customer-success cost related to sales. One company can produce three different CACs from the same books. That is why the calculator prints the spend and the customer count it actually divided beside the answer.

The second choice is blended or paid. Blended CAC spreads everything you spent over everyone you won, including customers who arrived through word of mouth. Paid CAC looks only at paid channels and the customers they produced, which makes it the better guide to what another dollar of advertising will buy. Andreessen Horowitz's illustration: if half your users cost $100 each through paid marketing and the other half arrive free, paid CAC is $100 and blended CAC is $50. Blended is not always the smaller figure, though; it can land above paid CAC when brand and content spend brings in few customers.

On its own, a CAC figure decides very little. $150 is cheap for a contract worth tens of thousands a year and ruinous for a $9-a-month app. It becomes a decision when you set it against what a customer is worth, as a lifetime-value ratio or as the months of gross profit it takes to earn the cost back.

What is cac calculator?

Customer acquisition cost is the money spent winning new customers during a period divided by the number of new paying customers won in that same period. It is an average over the period, not the cost of the next customer, which is usually higher as cheaper channels fill up. It is also not the cost per acquisition (CPA) an ad platform reports: CPA counts whatever conversion event the campaign was set to optimise, often a lead or a trial, inside one ad account, whereas CAC counts paying customers across all channels. CAC is not a GAAP measure. Companies that publish it choose their own scope, which is why the method matters as much as the number.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Fix the period first: a month suits self-serve products with short buying cycles, a quarter suits anything sold by a sales team. Every figure you enter must come from the same window.
  2. Choose Which CAC do you want? Blended answers what growth cost on average; paid answers what it costs to buy one more customer through advertising. For an investor update, run both and label each.
  3. Enter Paid-channel acquisition spend: media and ad spend, agency fees, affiliate and referral bounties, acquisition discounts and credits, and the loaded cost of salespeople who work only paid leads.
  4. Enter Other acquisition cost: brand and content marketing, PR, events, marketing tools and inbound sales staff. Decide once whether to follow Bessemer and include the sales-related share of customer success, then keep that choice every period.
  5. Enter New customers from paid channels and New customers from organic channels, counting customers who started paying in the period, not signups, trials or leads. If you cannot split customers by channel, put them all in the paid field and read only the blended result, since the paid figure would then divide paid spend by every customer.
  6. Check the numerator and denominator shown with the result, then take the CAC to the LTV:CAC ratio and CAC payback calculators, where it turns into a spending decision.

The formula.

CAC = (S_paid + S_other) ⁄ (N_paid + N_organic) · CAC_paid = S_paid ⁄ N_paid

With S_paid for paid-channel spend, S_other for other acquisition cost, N_paid for paid-attributed customers and N_organic for organic customers:

Blended CAC = (S_paid + S_other) ÷ (N_paid + N_organic) Paid CAC = S_paid ÷ N_paid Organic share = N_organic ÷ (N_paid + N_organic) × 100

Paid CAC ignores S_other and organic customers entirely. Blended CAC can be rewritten as a customer-weighted average of two rates: paid CAC, weighted by paid customers, and the unattributed spend per organic customer, S_other ÷ N_organic, weighted by organic customers. In the worked example those rates are $160 and 20,000 ÷ 150 = $133.33, and the weighted average of 250 customers at $160 and 150 at $133.33 is $150. Blended CAC therefore falls below paid CAC exactly when the unattributed spend per organic customer is lower than paid CAC, and rises above it when that spend is higher. Bear in mind that pairing brand spend with organic customers is a bookkeeping view; brand work also helps paid ads convert.

Zero spend is accepted, because a quarter won entirely by word of mouth really does have a CAC of $0. Zero customers is not: cost per customer is undefined with nobody to divide by, and the paid basis likewise needs at least one paid-attributed customer.

Because CAC is an average, it understates what growth costs at the margin. If another $10,000 of paid spend on top of the example's $40,000 brought in 40 more customers, those customers would cost $250 each, yet the average paid CAC would only rise from $160 to $172.41. Rising average CAC usually signals that the marginal figure has been climbing for a while.

Timing is the other source of distortion. In a business with a long sales cycle, the customers who close this quarter were often worked on last quarter, so some teams pair each period's new customers with the previous period's spend. Either approach is defensible if you state it and apply it consistently.

A worked example.

Example

A small software company closes its quarter having spent $40,000 on paid channels — search ads, a review-site listing and an affiliate programme — and $20,000 it cannot tie to a channel: a content writer, a conference stand and marketing tools. Four hundred customers started paying: 250 attributed to a paid source, 150 arriving directly or through referrals. On the blended basis the numerator is $40,000 + $20,000 = $60,000 and the denominator is 250 + 150 = 400 customers, so CAC = $60,000 ÷ 400 = $150. The organic share is 150 ÷ 400 = 37.5%. On the paid basis the calculator divides only $40,000 by 250 customers, giving $160. The $10 gap is the organic customers' doing. The $20,000 of unattributed spend works out at $133.33 per organic customer, cheaper than the $160 paid rate, so folding those customers in pulls the average down. A board slide quoting $150 and an investor memo quoting $160 are describing the same quarter, and each should say which definition it used.

other Acquisition Cost20,000
paid Channel Spend40,000
customers From Organic150
customers From Paid250
cost Basisblended

Frequently asked questions.

Which costs belong in customer acquisition cost?
There is no single rule. Skok uses the sales and marketing expense line; Andreessen Horowitz adds referral fees, credits and discounts; Bessemer adds sales compensation, brand and content marketing, demand generation and sales-related customer success. Pick a scope, write it down and keep it. SEC guidance on key metrics asks public companies for a clear definition and disclosure of any change in the method.
Should sales salaries and commissions be included?
Yes for people whose job is winning new customers, at loaded cost including commissions, benefits and payroll taxes. The judgement call is staff who split their time between new business and renewals: estimate the share spent on acquisition, include that share, and apply the same split every period so that changes in CAC reflect the business rather than the method.
Should I report blended or paid CAC?
Report both, labelled. Investors tend to ask for paid CAC because it shows what scaling ad spend will cost; boards often quote blended because it covers everything spent. A large organic share makes the two diverge: in the worked example, with 37.5% of customers arriving organically, blended is $150 and paid $160.
Why is my blended CAC higher than my paid CAC?
Because your unattributed spend per organic customer is above your paid CAC. Keep the example's $20,000 of other spend but suppose it produced only 20 organic customers: that is $1,000 per organic customer, and blended CAC becomes $60,000 ÷ 270 = $222.22, well above the $160 paid figure. Either the brand spend is underperforming or attribution is crediting its customers to paid channels.
Is CAC the same as the cost per acquisition in my ad dashboard?
No. An ad platform's CPA divides one campaign's spend by the conversion event you configured, usually a lead or a trial. CAC divides all acquisition spend by paying customers. A $40 CPA on trial sign-ups with 25% of trials converting to paid already means $160 of ad spend per paying customer, before any other acquisition cost is added.
What counts as a new customer?
Someone who started paying during the period. Signups, free trials, leads and freemium accounts do not count until they pay. Upsells to existing customers are expansion, not acquisition. Returning customers who had cancelled are a judgement call; whichever way you treat them, treat them the same way every period and say so.
How do I decide whether a customer came from paid or organic channels?
Pick one attribution rule and keep it. Under last-click attribution, a customer who first clicked an ad and weeks later typed your address into a browser counts as direct, which flatters organic; a first-touch rule credits the ad instead. Ads bought on your own brand name raise a similar question, because many of those searchers were already looking for you. Any change of rule moves customers between the two fields and so moves paid CAC, but blended CAC stays put, since it uses only the totals.
What is a good CAC?
There is no useful dollar benchmark, because CAC scales with what you sell. Judge it through ratios. Bessemer recommends investing in acquisition when customer lifetime value is at least 3 times CAC; below 1 time, each customer loses money. Payback months are CAC ÷ monthly gross profit per customer: $160 against $25 a month at an 80% gross margin is 160 ÷ 20 = 8 months.
Why doesn't my CAC match the sales and marketing expense in my accounts?
Under FASB ASC 340-40, incremental costs of obtaining a contract, sales commissions being the usual example, are recorded as an asset when the company expects to recover them and then amortised over time. CAC charges the whole cost to the period in which the customer was won, so a growing company's CAC will not tie to any single income-statement line.
Is it better to cut CAC or improve retention?
A 2004 study in the Journal of Marketing Research by Gupta, Lehmann and Stuart estimated how much customer value moved for each 1% improvement in a lever. Acquisition cost moved it by only 0.02% to 0.3%, while retention moved it by 2.45% to 6.75%. CAC still matters for budgeting, but keeping customers you have already paid for usually pays far more.

References& sources.

  1. [1]Andreessen Horowitz — Jordan, J., Hariharan, A., Chen, F., & Kasireddy, P. (21 August 2015). "16 Startup Metrics." Metric 7 defines CAC as "the full cost of acquiring users, stated on a per user basis" and gives the blended vs paid distinction and the $100/$50 illustration used on this page. Open web, retrieved 2026-07-29.
  2. [2]Skok, D. "SaaS Metrics 2.0 — Detailed Definitions," forEntrepreneurs.com. Gives CAC as "Sales & Marketing Expenses / Number of New Customers Acquired" and notes the distortion in early-stage companies. Undated revision, current as retrieved 2026-07-29.
  3. [3]Bessemer Venture Partners — D'Onofrio, M. "Scaling to $100 Million" (updated 2024 edition, PDF). Source of the wider S&M scope quoted on this page ("sales expenses, sales compensation, content and brand marketing, demand generation, and customer success expenses related to sales") and of the 3x CLTV/CAC and segment payback benchmarks. Open web PDF, retrieved 2026-07-29.
  4. [4]U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — "Commission Guidance on Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," Release Nos. 33-10751; 34-88094; FR-87, issued 30 January 2020, effective 25 February 2020. Section on Key Performance Indicators and Metrics requires "a clear definition of the metric and how it is calculated," a statement of why it is useful and how management uses it, and disclosure of any change in the method of calculation. Federal Register text via GovInfo (sec.gov blocks automated retrieval); retrieved 2026-07-29.
  5. [5]Gupta, S., Lehmann, D. R., & Stuart, J. A. (2004). "Valuing Customers." Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1), 7–18. Cohort model equations (3) and (6) subtract acquisition cost c_k per customer at acquisition; Table 4 reports acquisition-cost elasticity of 0.02–0.3 against retention elasticity of 2.45–6.75. Author copy hosted by Columbia Business School; retrieved 2026-07-29.
  6. [6]Financial Accounting Standards Board — Accounting Standards Codification Topic 340-40, "Other Assets and Deferred Costs — Contracts with Customers," paragraphs 340-40-25-1 to 25-4 (added by ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)). Requires incremental costs of obtaining a contract, such as a sales commission, to be recognised as an asset when recovery is expected. Bibliographic citation only: the Codification is behind a free-registration wall, so no verbatim text is attributed to the link.

How this page was produced

Published by
Quanta Calculator
Primary sources
6 cited below
Method
CAC = (S_paid + S_other) ⁄ (N_paid + N_organic) · CAC_paid = S_paid ⁄ N_paid
Published
Last verified

Built with AI assistance and verified by automated tests against the cited sources — every worked example on this page is computed by the same code that runs the calculator. How we build and check calculators.

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 1560 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon