Audited ·Last updated 27 Jul 2026·6 citations·Tier 1·0 uses

Present Value Calculator

Free present value calculator: discount a future lump sum and/or annuity back to today's dollars at any rate, compounding frequency, and payment timing.

Present Value Calculator

The single lump sum you expect to receive or need at the end of the horizon. Set to 0 if you only have a recurring payment, no lump sum.
$
An annuity payment received every compounding period. Set to 0 for a pure lump-sum problem.
$
Your required rate of return or opportunity cost. The calculator divides by the compounding frequency to get the per-period discount rate.
%
Time between today and the date the lump sum and/or payments arrive.
yrs
Compounding Frequency
Payment Timing
Present Value
$17,758.83
What the future lump sum and/or annuity is worth today, discounted at your chosen rate — the combined present value of both pieces.
PV of the Lump Sum
$7,413.72
PV of the Annuity
$10,345.11
Total Future Cash Flows (Undiscounted)
$22,000.00
Effective Annual Rate (EAR)
6.17%

Background.

A present value calculator answers the question every discounting problem in finance eventually reduces to: what is a future sum of money, or a stream of future payments, actually worth today? Present value (PV) is the mirror image of future value (FV) — instead of compounding a sum forward in time, it discounts a future sum backward, dividing it by (1 plus the periodic interest rate) raised to the number of periods between now and the payment date. The concept underlies bond pricing, lease valuation, lottery lump-sum-versus-annuity decisions, legal settlement structuring, pension buyout offers, and the whole discipline of discounted cash-flow analysis taught in every corporate-finance and CFA curriculum.

This calculator handles both halves of a present-value problem at once: a single future lump sum and a recurring future annuity payment, discounted together at one rate. Enter a future lump sum, a periodic payment, an annual discount rate, a time horizon, a compounding frequency, and whether payments arrive at the start or end of each period, and the tool returns the combined present value along with the two components broken out separately — so you can see exactly how much of the total came from the lump sum and how much came from the payment stream.

Quanta already publishes a future-value calculator that solves the same underlying time-value-of-money identity for four different unknowns — future value, present value, payment, or years — through a single "solve for" dropdown. This page exists alongside it deliberately, not as a duplicate. Someone who searches "present value calculator" is typically not thinking about future value at all; they have a known future number (a settlement offer, a bond's face value, a lease's payment schedule) and want to discount it back to today in the most direct interface possible, without first choosing a solver mode. The two pages compute the identical mathematics — FV = PV(1+i)^n + PMT×[(1+i)^n−1]/i rearranged for the variable you need — and this page's present value output will always match the future-value calculator's present-value solver mode for the same inputs. Use whichever framing matches how you are thinking about the problem; both link to each other for the alternate framing.

The distinction between ordinary annuities and annuity-due matters here just as it does for future value. An ordinary annuity assumes each payment lands at the end of its period — the standard convention for bond coupons, mortgage payments, and most textbook annuity formulas. An annuity-due assumes each payment lands at the beginning of its period — the convention for leases, rent, and insurance premiums. Because an annuity-due payment is, in effect, one period closer to today than the equivalent ordinary-annuity payment, its present value is always higher by a factor of exactly (1 plus the periodic rate). The calculator's Payment Timing toggle applies that factor automatically to the annuity portion only; it has no effect on the lump-sum portion, because a single lump sum has no "timing" ambiguity of its own.

Discount-rate selection deserves the same care here that it does in net present value analysis. For a corporate valuation, use the weighted average cost of capital. For a personal decision — a lottery payout, a structured settlement, a pension lump-sum offer — use your realistic opportunity cost, the return you could otherwise earn on money of comparable risk and liquidity. A higher discount rate always produces a lower present value, and the effect compounds with time: money forty years away discounted at 8 percent is worth barely a nickel on the dollar, while the same sum ten years away retains nearly half its face value. The calculator also reports the effective annual rate implied by your chosen nominal rate and compounding frequency, so two offers quoted on different compounding bases can be compared on equal footing.

Below the widget you will find the full derivation, a hand-verified worked example combining a lump sum and an annuity, FAQs on the FV/PV relationship, ordinary-versus-due timing, and choosing a discount rate, and citations to Brealey/Myers/Allen, Bodie/Kane/Marcus, the CFA Institute curriculum, and federal consumer-finance sources.

What is present value calculator?

Present value (PV) is the current worth of a future sum of money or stream of payments, given an assumed discount rate. It is the inverse operation of future value: where FV asks "what will this grow to," PV asks "what is that future amount worth right now." The two share the identical governing identity, FV = PV × (1+i)^n for a lump sum, rearranged to PV = FV / (1+i)^n. For an annuity — a series of equal payments — present value sums the discounted value of every individual payment; because each payment is progressively further in the future, each contributes progressively less to the total, forming a geometric series with the closed-form solution PV = PMT × [1 − (1+i)^−n] / i for an ordinary annuity, or that same figure multiplied by (1+i) for an annuity-due. Present value is the foundational concept behind bond pricing (a bond's price is the present value of its coupon payments plus its face value at maturity), lease accounting (the present value of future lease payments determines the liability recorded on a balance sheet), lottery payout decisions (comparing a lump-sum offer against the present value of an annuitized prize), and virtually every net-present-value capital-budgeting calculation, which is itself simply the present value of a project's future cash flows minus its upfront cost.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Enter the Future Lump Sum you expect to receive or need at the end of the horizon. Set this to 0 if your scenario is a pure annuity with no single ending payment.
  2. Enter the Future Periodic Payment — the recurring cash flow paid each compounding period. Set this to 0 for a pure lump-sum problem.
  3. Set the Discount Rate as a nominal annual percentage. The calculator divides by the compounding frequency to get the per-period rate used in the discounting formula.
  4. Enter Years — the time between today and when the lump sum and/or payments occur.
  5. Choose the Compounding Frequency. This determines both how often the discount rate compounds and, for an annuity, how often payments are assumed to arrive.
  6. Choose Payment Timing. End of Period (ordinary annuity) is the standard convention for bonds, loans, and most textbook formulas. Beginning of Period (annuity-due) is the convention for leases, rent, and insurance premiums, and produces a slightly higher present value for the annuity portion.
  7. Read the four outputs: Present Value (the combined total), PV of the Lump Sum and PV of the Annuity (the two components broken out separately), Total Future Cash Flows (the undiscounted nominal total for comparison), and the Effective Annual Rate implied by your compounding choice.

The formula.

PV = FV⁄(1+i)ⁿ + PMT×[1−(1+i)⁻ⁿ]⁄i

The calculator discounts two cash-flow types and adds the results together. Let i = r / m be the per-period discount rate, where r is the nominal annual rate (as a decimal) and m is the compounding frequency, and let n = years × m be the total number of periods. The present value of a future lump sum is PV_lumpsum = FV / (1 + i)^n — the lump sum divided by the same growth factor that would have compounded it forward. The present value of an ordinary annuity — equal payments made at the end of each period — is PV_annuity = PMT × [1 − (1 + i)^−n] / i, which is the standard formula for the present value of a finite, level payment stream. For an annuity-due (payments at the beginning of each period), every payment is effectively one period closer to today, so the ordinary-annuity formula is multiplied by (1 + i): PV_annuity_due = PMT × [1 − (1 + i)^−n] / i × (1 + i). The two present values are added together for the combined result: PV_total = FV / (1+i)^n + PMT × [1 − (1+i)^−n] / i × due_factor, where due_factor equals 1 for end-of-period payments and (1 + i) for beginning-of-period payments. When the per-period rate i equals zero, the annuity term is undefined by the formula above (division by zero), so the calculator instead uses the straight-line limit PMT × n × due_factor, which in the zero-rate case simplifies to exactly PMT × n since due_factor also collapses to 1 when i = 0. The effective annual rate, EAR = (1 + i)^m − 1, is reported separately so nominal rates quoted under different compounding conventions can be compared on equal footing. All arithmetic runs in arbitrary-precision Decimal.js math to avoid floating-point drift over long horizons and high-frequency compounding.

A worked example.

Example

Suppose you have been offered two things five years from now: a single $10,000 lump-sum payment, and a separate $200-per-month annuity paid at the end of each of the 60 months in between. Your opportunity cost of capital is 6% per year, compounded monthly, so the per-period rate is 6%/12 = 0.5% per month across n = 60 months. The present value of the $10,000 lump sum alone is 10000 / (1.005)^60 = $7,413.72. The present value of the $200/month ordinary annuity alone is 200 × [1 − (1.005)^−60] / 0.005 = $10,345.11. Adding the two together, the combined present value of everything you have been offered is $17,758.83 in today's dollars — meaningfully less than the $22,000 nominal total ($10,000 plus 60 × $200) because both pieces are discounted for the five-year wait. Now suppose the $200 monthly payments were instead paid at the beginning of each month (an annuity-due, as in a lease) rather than the end. Each payment now arrives one month earlier, so its present value rises: the annuity portion becomes $10,396.84, and the combined present value rises to $17,810.56 — about $51.73 more than the ordinary-annuity version, purely from the one-month timing shift. In both cases, the effective annual rate implied by 6% compounded monthly is 6.168%, slightly above the 6% nominal figure, which is exactly why the calculator reports EAR separately from the rate you entered.

annual Rate Percent6
payment Timingend
payment200
future Value10,000
compounding Per Year12
years5

Frequently asked questions.

What is the difference between present value and future value?
They are the same time-value-of-money identity viewed from opposite directions. Future value asks what a sum invested today will grow to by some future date; present value asks what a sum arriving on some future date is worth today. The identity linking them is FV = PV × (1 + i)^n, so PV = FV / (1 + i)^n is simply that equation solved for the other variable. Quanta's future-value calculator lets you solve the same equation for FV, PV, payment, or years through one dropdown; this calculator is a dedicated PV-first interface for anyone who already has a future number in hand — a settlement offer, a bond's face value, a pension payout — and wants to discount it back to today directly. The two tools will always agree for the same inputs.
Why is the annuity portion different for ordinary annuities versus annuity-due?
An ordinary annuity pays at the end of each period; an annuity-due pays at the beginning. Because a beginning-of-period payment arrives exactly one period sooner than an equivalent end-of-period payment, it needs one fewer period of discounting, which makes it worth more today by a factor of exactly (1 + i) per period. Leases, rent, and insurance premiums are typically structured as annuity-due (you pay before the coverage period, not after); bonds, mortgages, and most textbook annuity examples are ordinary. The lump-sum portion of this calculator is unaffected by the timing toggle because a single future payment has no periodic structure to shift.
What discount rate should I use?
Use your realistic opportunity cost — the return you could earn on the next-best use of the same money at a comparable risk level. For a corporate valuation, that is typically the weighted average cost of capital. For comparing a lottery lump sum against an annuitized prize, or a pension lump-sum buyout against a monthly pension, use a long-run, conservative investment return assumption net of any relevant taxes and fees. Choosing too low a rate overstates how attractive the future payments look today; choosing too high a rate understates them. Re-running the calculator at a couple of plausible rates is the standard way to stress-test the conclusion.
Why does the effective annual rate differ from the rate I entered?
The rate you enter is the nominal annual rate — the stated percentage before accounting for how often it compounds. The effective annual rate (EAR) accounts for compounding frequency: EAR = (1 + i)^m − 1, where i is the per-period rate and m is the number of compounding periods per year. EAR is always greater than or equal to the nominal rate, and the gap widens as the compounding frequency increases. A 6% nominal rate compounded monthly produces an EAR of about 6.168%; compounded daily it produces about 6.183%. Comparing two offers on their EAR, rather than their nominal rate, is the only way to compare products quoted under different compounding conventions on equal footing.
Can this calculator handle just a lump sum, or just an annuity, without the other?
Yes. Set the Future Periodic Payment to 0 for a pure lump-sum present-value problem — the annuity output will be exactly 0 and the total will equal the lump-sum figure alone. Set the Future Lump Sum to 0 for a pure annuity problem, such as valuing a pension or a lease's payment stream with no residual balloon payment — the lump-sum output will be exactly 0 and the total will equal the annuity figure alone. Both components are always computed and reported, so you can see the split even when one of them is zero.
What happens when the discount rate is 0%?
With a 0% rate there is no time value of money to discount away, so the present value simply equals the nominal, undiscounted total: the future lump sum plus every payment added up with no reduction, and payment timing (ordinary versus due) makes no difference because there is no per-period rate for the extra period to earn. The calculator handles this as an explicit branch rather than dividing by zero, so a 0% rate is always a valid, well-defined input rather than an error.
How is present value used in bond pricing?
A bond's price is the present value of two cash-flow streams discounted at the bond's yield to maturity: the annuity of periodic coupon payments, and the single lump-sum repayment of face value at maturity. This calculator's combined lump-sum-plus-annuity structure mirrors that exact decomposition — the future lump sum field represents the bond's face value, the periodic payment field represents the coupon, and the discount rate represents the yield to maturity. If the yield to maturity is below the bond's coupon rate the bond prices above par; if it is above the coupon rate the bond prices below par, which is exactly the inverse relationship between bond prices and interest rates that drives bond-market volatility.
Should I take a lottery lump sum or the annuitized payout?
Compute the present value of the annuitized payout stream at a realistic discount rate and compare it directly against the lump-sum offer, after adjusting both for their different tax treatments. Lottery organizations typically set the lump-sum offer using a government-bond-based discount rate, which is usually lower than what a diversified long-term investor could reasonably expect to earn; if your realistic opportunity cost meaningfully exceeds the embedded discount rate, the lump sum is generally the better mathematical choice, subject to your own risk tolerance, spending discipline, and estate-planning goals. This calculator's combined lump-sum-and-annuity structure lets you model exactly this kind of comparison in one pass.

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 313 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon