Audited 27 Jul 2026·Last updated 28 Oct 2026·5 citations·Tier 1·0 uses

Recipe Scaler

Scale an ingredient from the servings a recipe makes to the servings you need, rounded exactly, to eighths or to quarters, with a mL figure for cups and spoons.

Recipe Scaler

Number of servings the original recipe makes.
Number of servings you want to make.
Quantity of a single ingredient in the original recipe.
Ingredient unit
Show metric volume equivalents
Rounding style
Scaling factor
2.5
The number every ingredient is multiplied by: desired servings divided by original servings, a ratio with no unit (2.5 means two and a half times the recipe).
Scaled ingredient quantity
5
Scaled quantity in millilitres
1,200 mL

Background.

A recipe written for four, a table set for ten. The arithmetic is a single ratio, 10 ÷ 4 = 2.5, but applying it at the counter is fiddly: three-quarters of a cup times 2.5 is 1.875 cups, an amount no measuring cup is marked with, and 1½ teaspoons becomes 3.75 teaspoons, which is easier to measure as a tablespoon plus ¾ teaspoon. Enter one ingredient at a time and you get the scaled amount in the unit you started with, rounded the way you choose, and for cups, spoons, fluid ounces and metric volumes the same amount in millilitres.

Proportional scaling is the right starting point because a recipe is a set of ratios. Flour to liquid, fat to flour, sugar to everything else: multiply every ingredient by the same factor and those ratios survive, which is why a doubled stew tastes like the original. What does not scale with the ingredient list is the cooking. A cake batter doubled into the same tin is twice as deep and bakes differently; a pot holding two and a half times the soup takes longer to come to the boil; a big batch of dough is harder to mix by hand. Salt, strong spices and leavening deserve a taste or a test after a large change, and tested preserving recipes should not be rescaled casually at all.

The millilitre figures follow the US nutrition-labelling definitions in 21 CFR 101.9, where a teaspoon is 5 mL, a tablespoon 15 mL and a cup 240 mL, plus 29.5735 mL for a US fluid ounce. Grams, ounces, pounds and counted items get no millilitre line, because turning weight into volume needs the density of the particular ingredient: USDA's FoodData Central lists a cup of all-purpose flour at 125 g, a cup of granulated sugar at 200 g and a cup of whole milk at 244 g.

What is recipe scaler?

The scaling factor is the number every ingredient is multiplied by: desired servings divided by original servings. It is a pure ratio with no unit, so it works the same on cups, grams, pounds or eggs, and it runs in either direction: 2.5 to go from four servings to ten, 0.5 to halve a recipe for four into one for two, 1.6667 to stretch a six-serving recipe to ten. A factor of 1 leaves everything as it was.

The servings are only a way of expressing that ratio. Any two numbers in the right proportion give the same factor, which makes the fields useful for scaling by something other than people: a pan's area, a number of loaves, a percentage. Bakers working in baker's percentages rely on the same idea, writing every ingredient as a percentage of the flour weight so that choosing a new amount of flour fixes everything else. Scaling keeps the proportions and changes the total; unit conversion keeps the amount and changes the unit. This calculator does the first, and for volumes it adds one piece of the second.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Enter Original servings as printed on the recipe and Desired servings as the number you need; both must be at least 1. To halve a recipe that serves four, enter 4 and 2.
  2. Type the Ingredient quantity as a decimal: 1½ becomes 1.5 and ¾ becomes 0.75. Enter a third as 0.3333 rather than 0.33, which is a full percent short.
  3. Pick the Ingredient unit the recipe uses. Ounce means a weight ounce, so choose Fluid ounce for liquids measured by volume; Count is for eggs, garlic cloves, lemons and anything else you count rather than measure.
  4. Leave Show metric volume equivalents on Yes if you would rather pour liquids into a metric jug. The millilitre line appears only for teaspoons, tablespoons, cups, fluid ounces, millilitres and litres.
  5. Choose a Rounding style that matches how you will measure: Exact decimal for a scale or metric jug, Fraction for cup and spoon sets marked in eighths, Practical kitchen rounding for quarters and whole grams or millilitres. Then change the quantity and unit for the next ingredient; the servings stay as they are.

The formula.

S = D⁄O ; Qty′ = Qty × S

Two lines carry the whole method: S = D ÷ O, then Qty′ = Qty × S. O is the number of servings the recipe makes, D the number you want, Qty the ingredient amount and Qty′ the scaled amount, in the same unit as Qty. Nothing else touches the scaled quantity unless you ask for rounding.

Rounding changes only the displayed quantity. Fraction mode moves cups, tablespoons, teaspoons, fluid ounces, ounces, pounds and counts to the nearest 1/8 and leaves grams, millilitres and litres exact. Practical kitchen rounding moves the same household units to the nearest 1/4, rounds grams and millilitres to whole numbers, and leaves litres exact. An amount exactly halfway between two steps goes up, so 1.875 cups, midway between 1¾ and 2, shows as 2 under kitchen rounding. An amount small enough to round to zero is shown unrounded instead, so a pinch never vanishes from the list. Results always appear as decimals; a fraction-mode answer of 1.875 is 1⅞ on a measuring cup.

The millilitre line comes from the exact scaled amount, never the rounded one, using these factors: teaspoon 5 mL, tablespoon 15 mL and cup 240 mL, the 21 CFR 101.9 labelling definitions; US fluid ounce 29.5735 mL; millilitre 1; litre 1,000. The labelling values are rounder than the US customary measures, in which a cup is 236.588 mL and a tablespoon 14.787 mL, so cups and spoons converted here read about 1.4% higher than a customary conversion would. The fluid ounce uses the customary figure, which means 8 fl oz converts to 236.588 mL while 1 cup converts to 240 mL. Neither gap is big enough to change how a dish turns out, but it explains why two converters can disagree by a few millilitres. Weight units and counts never get a millilitre figure, and nothing here converts between weight and volume.

A worked example.

Example

A recipe that serves 4 calls for ¾ cup of granulated sugar, and you are cooking for 10. Enter 4 and 10, a quantity of 0.75 in cups, metric equivalents on and Exact decimal. The scaling factor is 10 ÷ 4 = 2.5. The sugar becomes 0.75 × 2.5 = 1.875 cups, which is 1⅞ cups, or 1¾ cups plus 2 tablespoons, since an eighth of a cup is 2 tablespoons. In millilitres it is 1.875 × 240 = 450 mL. For sugar a weight is more useful still. FoodData Central lists a cup of granulated sugar at 200 g, so 1.875 cups is 1.875 × 200 = 375 g on a kitchen scale, a figure that no longer depends on how firmly the cup was filled.

rounding Modeexact
metric Volumeyes
desired Servings10
ingredient Quantity0.75
ingredient Unitcup
original Servings4

Frequently asked questions.

Why is 1 cup converted as 240 mL when my measuring jug marks a cup at about 237?
Both are right for different purposes. A US customary cup is 8 US fluid ounces, or 236.588 mL, while the US nutrition-labelling rule in 21 CFR 101.9 defines a cup as 240 mL, a tablespoon as 15 mL and a teaspoon as 5 mL, and those labelling figures are the ones used here. The gap is about 3.4 mL per cup, roughly two-thirds of a teaspoon, and it scales with the amount: 1.875 cups is 450 mL here against 443.6 mL by the customary cup.
Can I scale Australian or British recipes with it?
Yes, but watch the millilitre line. Australian and New Zealand recipes use a 250 mL metric cup, and an Australian tablespoon is 20 mL, four teaspoons rather than three, so an Australian tablespoon converted here comes out a quarter short. The scaling itself is unaffected: 2 cups times 2.5 is 5 cups in any country. For those recipes, scale in the original unit or enter the amount in millilitres instead. Older British recipes in imperial fluid ounces use 28.41 mL to the ounce, not the US 29.57 mL.
Why is there no millilitre figure for grams, ounces or pounds?
Because weight converts to volume only through density, and density depends on the ingredient. FoodData Central gives 125 g for a cup of all-purpose flour, 200 g for a cup of granulated sugar and 244 g for a cup of whole milk, so the same cup can weigh almost twice as much from one ingredient to the next. The Ounce option is a weight ounce of 28.35 g for that reason. If your recipe means a liquid measure, choose Fluid ounce, which does get a millilitre line.
How do I scale a recipe to a different pan size?
Scale by area instead of servings. Put the original pan's area in Original servings and the new pan's area in Desired servings; the factor is the same ratio either way. An 8-inch square pan is 64 square inches and a 9 × 13 pan is 117, so the factor is 117 ÷ 64 = 1.8281. A round pan's area is 3.1416 times the radius squared, so a 9-inch round is about 63.6 square inches, almost the same as the 8-inch square. Keeping the batter depth similar keeps the baking time close to the original.
What do I do with 2.5 eggs?
Counts scale like anything else, so 2 eggs in a recipe for four become 2.5 eggs for five, and neither rounding style forces a count to a whole number. Beat the third egg and use half of it: FoodData Central puts a large egg at 50 g out of the shell, so half is about 25 g on a scale. In a forgiving dish such as a meatloaf, rounding to 2 or 3 eggs rarely matters; in a cake or custard, where eggs set the structure, the half egg is worth keeping.
Should salt, spices and baking powder be scaled exactly?
Start from the exact figure and adjust, rather than guessing. For doubling or halving, proportional amounts generally work. Over a big change, hold back a little of the salt and the strongest spices and add the rest after tasting, since seasoning can be added to a large pot but not taken out. Baking powder, baking soda and yeast affect rise and timing more than flavour, so bake a small test batch before committing a large one. The calculator supplies the proportional amount and knows nothing about individual ingredients.
Why doesn't the millilitre figure match the rounded cups?
Because it is calculated from the exact amount, not the rounded one. In the four-to-ten example, ¾ cup scales to 1.875 cups. Practical kitchen rounding shows that as 2 cups, the nearest quarter, but the millilitre line stays at 450 mL, which is 1.875 × 240 rather than 2 × 240 = 480. Measure by the millilitre figure and you get the precise amount; measure the rounded 2 cups and you accept an extra 30 mL, about 7% more than the recipe calls for.
Which rounding style should I choose?
Match it to what you measure with. Exact decimal suits a scale or a metric jug, where 312.5 g is as easy to hit as 300 g. Fraction rounds to eighths, which covers most cup and spoon sets, though thirds do not sit on that grid: a scaled ⅓ cup shows as 0.375, or ⅜. Practical kitchen rounding works in quarters and whole grams or millilitres, turning 312.5 g into 313 g, but on small amounts the quarter grid is coarse: that same ⅓ cup becomes 0.25, a quarter less than intended.
Does doubling a recipe double the cooking time?
No, and nothing here predicts the new time. Cooking time follows the size of each piece or the depth of each layer, not the number of servings. Doubling a batch of cookies baked on two trays leaves the time per tray unchanged; doubling a casserole into a deeper dish lengthens it, because heat has further to travel to the centre; doubling a soup in a wider pot may hardly change it. Judge doneness by the recipe's cues, such as colour, texture or internal temperature, rather than by the clock.
Can I scale a canning or jam recipe?
Treat tested preserving recipes as procedures, not just ingredient lists. Their acidity, jar size and processing time were validated together, and the processing time depends on the jar size, not on how many jars you fill. Changing the proportion of acid or of low-acid vegetables can make a preserve unsafe, and many cooked-jam recipes made with commercial pectin say plainly not to double the batch because it may not set. Make the tested batch size, and repeat it if you need more.

How this page was produced

Published by
Quanta Calculator
Primary sources
5 cited below
Method
S = D⁄O ; Qty′ = Qty × S
Published
Last verified

Built with AI assistance and verified by automated tests against the cited sources — every worked example on this page is computed by the same code that runs the calculator. How we build and check calculators.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 1560 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon