Audited 26 Jul 2026·Last updated 28 Oct 2026·6 citations·Tier 1·0 uses

Exponent Calculator

Raise a number to any power, or work backwards: recover the base as an nth root or the exponent as a logarithm, with the answer in scientific notation.

Exponent Calculator

What do you want to solve for?
The number that gets multiplied by itself. Can be positive, negative, or zero — though zero combined with a non-positive exponent is undefined, and a negative base combined with a non-integer exponent gives a complex (non-real) result. When solving for base, this field is ignored.
The power — how many times the base is multiplied by itself. Integer exponents (2, 3, 10) are repeated multiplication. Negative exponents (−2, −3) give reciprocals: a^(−n) = 1/a^n. Fractional exponents (1/2, 1/3, 2/3) give roots: a^(1/n) = nth root of a. When solving for exponent, this field is ignored.
The output of the exponentiation. Used only when solving for base (the calculator computes the nth root of this value) or for exponent (the calculator computes log_base(result)). Ignored when solving for result.
Result (a^n)
1,024
The value x in aⁿ = x: computed from your base and exponent, or the result you entered when solving for the base or exponent.
Base (a)
2
Exponent (n)
10
Scientific notation — mantissa
1.024
Scientific notation — exponent
3 (10^x)

Background.

Powers turn up whenever something multiplies by the same factor again and again. Money earning 7% a year is multiplied by 1.07 each year, so after a decade it has grown by 1.07¹⁰ = 1.9672 — almost exactly double. A radioactive sample keeps half of what it had every half-life, so after three half-lives 0.5³ = 0.125 of it remains. Ten binary digits can count 2¹⁰ = 1,024 different values, which is where the computer kilobyte of 1,024 bytes came from.

Each of those is one equation, aⁿ = x, and in practice you can be missing any of its three numbers. Usually it is the result: you know the base a and the exponent n and want x. Sometimes it is the base: what yearly growth factor doubles a sum in ten years? That is the tenth root of 2, about 1.0718, or 7.18% a year. And often it is the exponent: how many years at 5% does doubling take? That is a logarithm, log base 1.05 of 2, which comes to 14.2067 years. The solve-for menu chooses which of the three you want, and the remaining two fields hold what you already know.

The exponent does not have to be a positive whole number. A negative exponent means a reciprocal, so 2⁻³ = 1/8 = 0.125. A fraction means a root, so 16^0.25 is the fourth root of 16, which is 2. Any other decimal, such as 4^1.5 = 8, is handled the same way, through the logarithm definition of a power.

A few combinations have no real-number answer, and you get a message instead of a number. A negative base with a fractional exponent is the usual one: (−8)^0.5 would be a square root of a negative number. Zero raised to a negative power would mean dividing by zero. And results beyond about 1.8 × 10³⁰⁸ are larger than standard computer arithmetic can hold, so 10³⁰⁹ is declined while 10³⁰⁸ is shown. Alongside every answer you also get its scientific-notation form, a mantissa between 1 and 10 and a power of ten, which is the only comfortable way to read a figure such as 2¹⁰⁰ ≈ 1.268 × 10³⁰.

What is exponent calculator?

Exponentiation is repeated multiplication extended to every kind of exponent. For a positive whole number n, aⁿ means n copies of a multiplied together, so 5³ = 5 × 5 × 5 = 125. The definition is then stretched so that the index laws keep working: a⁰ = 1 for any non-zero a, a⁻ⁿ = 1/aⁿ, and a^(1/n) is the nth root of a, the number whose nth power gives back a. For a positive base and any real exponent, aⁿ is defined as e^(n·ln a), which agrees with all the cases above and fills in the gaps between them. The operation has two inverses, because the base and the exponent play different roles: the nth root recovers the base from the result, and the logarithm recovers the exponent. Those are the three directions the solve-for menu offers.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Choose what to solve for. Result computes aⁿ from a base and an exponent; Base finds the number that, raised to your exponent, gives your result; Exponent finds the power that turns your base into your result. Whichever field you are solving for is ignored, so you can leave its old value in place.
  2. For Result, enter the base and the exponent. Type fractional exponents as decimals: 0.5 for a square root, 0.25 for a fourth root, 1.5 for 'square root, then cubed'. Put a negative base in the Base field as a negative number; (−2) squared is entered as base −2, exponent 2, and gives 4.
  3. For Base, enter the known result and the exponent that produced it. A square root uses exponent 2, not 0.5: result 9 with exponent 2 returns 3, while exponent 0.5 would return 81, the number whose square root is 9. Negative results work with odd exponents (result −8, exponent 3 gives −2) and are declined with even ones.
  4. For Exponent, enter a base and a result, both above zero, with the base not equal to 1. Base 10 gives the common logarithm, base 2 the number of doublings, and base 2.718281828459045 (e) the natural logarithm. A base between 0 and 1 is allowed and counts halvings or other shrinking steps.
  5. Read the scientific-notation pair under the main answer. It always describes the Result value, so in Base and Exponent modes it restates the result you typed rather than the number you solved for.

The formula.

result = aⁿ

Each mode rearranges x = aⁿ, where a is the base, n the exponent and x the result. In Result mode the calculator evaluates aⁿ directly. In Base mode it computes a = x^(1/n), the nth root of x; when x is negative and n is an odd whole number it takes the root of |x| and makes the answer negative, because (−2)³ = −8 means the cube root of −8 really is −2. With n even, or not a whole number, a negative x has no real root and is refused, and n = 0 is refused because every non-zero base gives a⁰ = 1, so the base cannot be recovered. In Exponent mode it uses the change-of-base rule n = ln x ÷ ln a, which needs a > 0, a ≠ 1 and x > 0; base 1 would put ln 1 = 0 in the denominator. The scientific-notation outputs come from the result: the power of ten is the whole-number part of log₁₀|x| rounded down, and the mantissa is x divided by that power of ten, so 1,024 becomes 1.024 × 10³. The index laws all follow from the repeated-multiplication picture: aᵐ·aⁿ = aᵐ⁺ⁿ, aᵐ/aⁿ = aᵐ⁻ⁿ, (aᵐ)ⁿ = aᵐⁿ, (ab)ⁿ = aⁿbⁿ and (a/b)ⁿ = aⁿ/bⁿ. For example 2¹⁰ × 2³ = 2¹³ = 8,192, while (2³)² = 2⁶ = 64. A fractional exponent m/n combines a root and a power in either order, so 27^(2/3) is the cube root of 27, which is 3, squared to give 9. Because the exponent multiplies the logarithm of the base, a long run of periods magnifies small differences in the base: 1.07³⁰ = 7.6123 but 1.08³⁰ = 10.0627, about a third more from a single extra percentage point of growth. Numbers are carried in standard double-precision arithmetic and shown to 15 significant figures, which is far more than everyday work needs but not enough to spell out every digit of very large integers.

A worked example.

Example

Take the default inputs: base 2, exponent 10, solving for the result. Raising 2 to the 10th power means ten 2s multiplied together, and the running product doubles at each step: 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512 and finally 1,024. So 2¹⁰ = 1,024. In scientific notation the decimal point moves three places to the left, leaving one digit in front of it: 1,024 = 1.024 × 10³, so the mantissa is 1.024 and the power of ten is 3. The closeness of 1,024 to 1,000 is why ten doublings are often called 'about a thousand-fold'. The error is 1,024 ÷ 1,000 = 1.024, or 2.4%, but it compounds: 2²⁰ = 1,048,576 is 4.86% above a million, and 2³⁰ = 1,073,741,824 is 7.37% above a billion. That drift is why a drive sold as 1,000,000,000 bytes appears smaller once an operating system counts it in units of 2³⁰.

solve Forresult
base2
exponent10

Frequently asked questions.

Why does −2 squared come out as 4 here when my phone calculator says −4?
Written mathematics applies the exponent before the minus sign, so −2² means −(2²) = −4. Here the minus sign belongs to the base you typed, so base −2 with exponent 2 is (−2)² = 4. Both are correct for what they mean; if you want −4, compute 2² and attach the minus sign yourself.
The cube root of −8 is −2, so why is base −8 with exponent 0.3333 refused?
A decimal can only approximate 1/3, and a negative number raised to a non-whole power that is not exactly an odd root has no real value, so the result is undefined. Use Base mode instead: result −8 with exponent 3 asks which number cubed gives −8, and returns −2 directly.
How long does money take to double at 5% interest a year?
Choose Exponent, enter base 1.05 and result 2, and you get 14.2067 years — the number of times 1.05 must be multiplied in to reach 2. The rule of 72 approximates the same thing as 72 ÷ 5 = 14.4 years. For other rates, change the base to 1 plus the rate as a decimal.
What growth rate per period turns 1 into 2 over 10 periods?
Choose Base, enter result 2 and exponent 10. The answer, 1.0718, is the tenth root of 2: multiplying by it ten times doubles a quantity. Subtract 1 to read it as a rate of 7.18% per period. Check it in Result mode: 1.0718 to the 10th comes back to almost exactly 2.
What does 0 to the power 0 return, and is that right?
It returns 1. That is the convention used in algebra, combinatorics and power series, where x⁰ = 1 keeps formulas such as the binomial theorem free of special cases. In calculus, 0⁰ is called an indeterminate form because expressions approaching it can tend to different limits; it is a convention, not a theorem.
Why does any non-zero number to the power 0 equal 1?
Look at the pattern 2³ = 8, 2² = 4, 2¹ = 2: each step down divides by 2, so the next step is 2 ÷ 2 = 1. The quotient law says the same thing, since aⁿ ÷ aⁿ = aⁿ⁻ⁿ = a⁰ and anything divided by itself is 1. Zero is excluded because 0 ÷ 0 is undefined.
How many half-lives until only 10% of a sample is left?
Choose Exponent, enter base 0.5 and result 0.1. The answer is 3.3219 half-lives, because 0.5 multiplied by itself 3.3219 times leaves one tenth. For carbon-14, with a half-life near 5,730 years, that is roughly 19,000 years. A base below 1 always gives shrinking powers, so larger exponents mean smaller results.
Why does 2 to the 64th show as 1.845 × 10¹⁹ instead of every digit?
The exact value is 18,446,744,073,709,551,616, which has 20 digits. Standard double-precision numbers hold about 15 to 17 significant digits and cannot even represent every whole number above 2⁵³ = 9,007,199,254,740,992. The calculator keeps 15 significant figures, so for exact large integers in cryptography or number theory use a computer-algebra system.
How do I work out a stacked power such as 2 to the 3 to the 2?
Stacked exponents are evaluated from the top down: 2^(3²) = 2⁹ = 512. Working from the bottom up instead gives (2³)² = 8² = 64, a different number. Compute the upper power first in Result mode (3² = 9), then use 9 as the exponent with base 2.
What happens when the answer is extremely large or extremely small?
Results up to about 1.797 × 10³⁰⁸ are shown, so 10³⁰⁸ works but 10³⁰⁹ is declined as too large. At the small end, values below roughly 5 × 10⁻³²⁴ cannot be stored and come back as 0, which is why 10⁻⁴⁰⁰ reads as zero. Anything from 10¹⁵ upward or below 0.001 is displayed in scientific notation.

References& sources.

  1. [1]Knuth, Donald E. The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 1: Fundamental Algorithms, 3rd edition. Addison-Wesley, 1997 — §1.2.4 (Integer Functions and Elementary Number Theory) and §1.2.5 (Permutations and Factorials) cover the formal definition of integer exponentiation, the index laws, and the algorithmic complexity of fast exponentiation (binary method, O(log n)).
  2. [2]Hardy, G. H. and Wright, E. M. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 6th edition. Oxford University Press, 2008 — §1.4 develops integer powers and the index laws from first principles, and §4.1–4.3 extend to rational and real exponents via the limit definition.
  3. [3]NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, §4 — Elementary Functions, particularly §4.2 (Definitions) and §4.4 (Logarithms and Powers). The definitive modern reference for the analytic definition of the power function a^z for real and complex arguments, the index laws, and numerical evaluation strategies.
  4. [4]Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series 55, 1964 — §4 (Elementary Transcendental Functions), particularly §4.2 on power functions and §4.1 on the exponential and logarithm. Still cited by NIST DLMF as a foundational reference.
  5. [5]Lang, Serge. Algebra, 3rd edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 211, Springer, 2002 — Chapter 1 develops exponentiation in arbitrary monoids and groups, the index laws as group-theoretic identities, and the extension from integer to rational exponents via the structure of ordered fields.
  6. [6]ISO 80000-2:2019 — Quantities and units, Part 2: Mathematics. International standard fixing the notation a^n for exponentiation, n√a for the nth root, and the constraints on real-valued evaluation (positive base for non-integer exponents).

How this page was produced

Published by
Quanta Calculator
Primary sources
6 cited below
Method
result = aⁿ
Published
Last verified

Built with AI assistance and verified by automated tests against the cited sources — every worked example on this page is computed by the same code that runs the calculator. How we build and check calculators.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 1560 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon