Audited 31 Jul 2026·Last updated 28 Oct 2026·3 citations·Tier 2·0 uses

Hair Diffraction Calculator

Estimate a hair's thickness from its laser diffraction pattern: enter the wavelength, the hair-to-screen distance and the spacing between dark fringes.

Hair Diffraction Calculator

m
m
m
Estimated hair diameter
6.500 × 10⁻⁵
Estimated width of the hair in metres from wavelength × screen distance ÷ fringe spacing; 6.5 × 10⁻⁵ m is 65 micrometres.
Model scope
Small-angle far-field estimate treating the hair as an opaque strip through Babinet's principle; alignment, nonuniform diameter, finite beam size, fringe-order identification, exact-angle geometry, and uncertainty remain outside it.

Background.

Shine a laser pointer at a single strand of hair and a wall a couple of metres away shows not a crisp shadow but a row of bright and dark bands spreading sideways from the beam. The hair is diffracting the light, and how far those bands spread depends on how thick the hair is: the thinner the strand, the wider the pattern. That turns a width of a few hundredths of a millimetre into a pattern you can measure with a tape measure.

The method rests on Babinet's principle. A narrow opaque strip and a slit of the same width are complementary screens, and away from the direct beam they produce the same diffraction pattern. The hair therefore behaves like a single slit, whose dark fringes fall where d sin θ = mλ for whole numbers m. At the small angles involved, neighbouring dark fringes on the screen sit Δy = λL ÷ d apart, which rearranges to d = λL ÷ Δy.

Two of the three inputs are easy. The wavelength is usually printed on the laser's warning label, and the screen distance is a tape-measure job. The fringe spacing needs care, because the central bright band is twice as wide as the others. Measure between matching dark fringes on either side of it and divide by twice their order, rather than judging a single gap by eye.

What comes out is a small-angle, far-field estimate. It treats the hair as a straight strip of uniform width square to the beam, whereas real hairs taper, are often slightly oval in cross-section and drift out of alignment. No uncertainty is attached to the figure, so repeat the measurement at a few points along the strand if the number matters.

What is hair diffraction calculator?

Hair diffraction is the spreading of a laser beam around a thin fibre into a pattern of alternating bright and dark fringes. Measuring the distance between neighbouring dark fringes, together with the laser wavelength and the hair-to-screen distance, gives the hair's diameter through the single-slit relation d ≈ λL ÷ Δy. All inputs and the result are in metres. It is a classic teaching experiment because it turns a microscopic width into a centimetre-scale pattern.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Enter the Laser wavelength in metres. Red diode pointers are commonly 650 nm or 635 nm (6.5e-7 or 6.35e-7 m), a helium-neon laser is 632.8 nm and a green pointer 532 nm; check your laser's label.
  2. Enter the Screen distance from the hair to the wall in metres. Two metres or more spreads the fringes enough to measure comfortably.
  3. For the Adjacent dark-fringe spacing, measure from the nth dark fringe on one side of the central band to the nth on the other, then divide by 2n. A 12 cm span between the third dark fringes on each side means 0.02 m.
  4. Read the hair diameter in metres and multiply by 1,000,000 for micrometres.

The formula.

d approximately lambda L / Delta y

d = λL ÷ Δy, where λ is the laser wavelength, L the distance from hair to screen and Δy the spacing between adjacent dark fringes, all in metres. It comes from the single-slit condition for darkness, d sin θ = mλ. Under the small-angle approximation sin θ ≈ tan θ = y ÷ L, the mth dark fringe sits at y = mλL ÷ d, so neighbouring dark fringes are λL ÷ d apart; Babinet's principle lets the opaque hair stand in for the slit. The diameter is inversely proportional to the fringe spacing, so misreading a 20 mm spacing by 1 mm shifts the answer by about 5%. The approximation is excellent at the angles a hair produces, about 0.01 radian in the example, and the setup is in the far field when L is much larger than d² ÷ λ, only a few millimetres for a hair.

A worked example.

Example

A red laser of wavelength 650 nm, or 6.5 × 10⁻⁷ m, shines on a hair 2 m from a wall, and adjacent dark fringes are found 0.02 m apart. Multiply wavelength by distance: 6.5 × 10⁻⁷ × 2 = 1.3 × 10⁻⁶ m². Divide by the fringe spacing: 1.3 × 10⁻⁶ ÷ 0.02 = 6.50 × 10⁻⁵ m. The hair is 65 micrometres, or 0.065 mm, thick. Precision hinges on the fringe measurement. Reading the spacing as 21 mm instead of 20 would give about 61.9 micrometres, and 19 mm about 68.4. The same hair lit by a 532 nm green laser would produce fringes only about 16.4 mm apart, which is harder to measure accurately.

fringe Spacing M0.02
wavelength M0
screen Distance M2

Frequently asked questions.

Why does a hair make the same pattern as a slit?
Babinet's principle says that a screen and its complement, here a slit and an opaque strip of the same width, together let through the whole unobstructed beam. Away from the direct beam their diffracted light therefore has the same intensity pattern. The only clear difference is the bright laser spot in the centre of the hair's pattern.
Why is the central bright band twice as wide as the others?
Dark fringes occur at orders m = ±1, ±2 and so on, with no dark fringe at m = 0. The central band therefore runs from the first dark fringe on one side to the first on the other, a span of 2λL ÷ d, which is 4 cm in the example. Measuring it as one spacing would halve the diameter.
Does the colour of the laser change the answer?
Not if you enter the right wavelength, because the formula accounts for it. Colour does change how easy the measurement is: a shorter wavelength squeezes the fringes closer together. A 65-micrometre hair at 2 m gives 20 mm spacing in red 650 nm light but about 16.4 mm in green 532 nm light.
How far from the hair should the screen be?
The formula needs the far field, where the distance is much larger than d² ÷ λ, which is only about 6.5 mm for this hair. In practice the limit is measurement: at 1 m the example hair gives fringes 10 mm apart, at 2 m 20 mm, so farther is better until the pattern grows too faint to read.
Why do repeated measurements of the same hair disagree?
A hair is not a uniform cylinder. It tapers along its length, its cross-section is often oval so turning it presents a different width to the beam, and it may not hang square to the light. Measure at several points along the strand and average the results for a fairer figure.

References& sources.

  1. [1]OpenStax, University Physics Volume 3, section 1.4, Diffraction.
  2. [2]Hecht, Optics, 5th ed. (PRINT).
  3. [3]BIPM, The International System of Units (SI Brochure), 9th ed., version 3.01, coherent derived units and quantity equations.

How this page was produced

Published by
Quanta Calculator
Primary sources
3 cited below
Method
d approximately lambda L / Delta y
Published
Last verified

Built with AI assistance and verified by automated tests against the cited sources — every worked example on this page is computed by the same code that runs the calculator. How we build and check calculators.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 1560 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon