Audited 31 Jul 2026·Last updated 28 Oct 2026·3 citations·Tier 2·0 uses

Magnetic Permeability Calculator

Find a material's magnetic permeability μ = B/H in henries per metre from a measured flux density in tesla and field strength in amperes per metre.

Magnetic Permeability Calculator

T
A/m
Magnetic permeability
1.563 × 10⁻⁶
The secant magnetic permeability at the entered operating point, flux density divided by field strength, in henries per metre.
Model scope
Secant B/H ratio at the entered operating point; nonlinear, hysteretic, anisotropic, frequency-dependent, and complex permeability require a defined material test method.

Background.

Put the same coil, carrying the same current, around air and then around an iron bar, and the magnetic field inside changes enormously. The current sets the magnetising field H, measured in amperes per metre; the material decides how much magnetic flux density B, in tesla, that field produces. Permeability is the ratio between them, μ = B / H, and it is the number that separates a transformer core from a block of wood.

Empty space sets the reference. Its permeability, μ₀, is about 1.25663706 × 10⁻⁶ henries per metre, and dividing any material's permeability by μ₀ gives its relative permeability. Most substances sit extremely close to 1: diamagnetic materials such as water and copper fall a whisker below it, paramagnetic ones such as aluminium a whisker above. Ferromagnetic materials, iron, nickel, cobalt and their alloys, reach into the hundreds or thousands, which is why they are used to concentrate flux in motors, inductors and shielding.

For those ferromagnetic materials the ratio is not a fixed property. Their B–H curve bends as the material approaches saturation, and the flux density depends on the material's magnetic history as well as the present field. A single B and H pair therefore gives the secant permeability at that one operating point: the slope of a straight line from the origin to the point on the curve. Change the field and the answer changes with it, so record the operating point alongside the result.

What is magnetic permeability calculator?

Magnetic permeability is the ratio of magnetic flux density B to magnetic field strength H in a material, measured in henries per metre (equivalently tesla-metres per ampere). It describes how readily a material supports magnetic flux when a magnetising field is applied. The value computed here is the secant, or amplitude, permeability: B divided by H at one point, as opposed to the slope of the curve at that point or the limiting value at very low field.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Enter the flux density B in tesla. Hall-effect probes and gaussmeters often read in gauss or millitesla: 1 gauss is 0.0001 T and 1 mT is 0.001 T.
  2. Enter the field strength H in amperes per metre. For a long solenoid or a toroid it is the number of turns times the current divided by the magnetic path length; 400 turns carrying 1 A over 0.25 m gives 1,600 A/m.
  3. Make sure B and H describe the same point in the same sample at the same moment; for a hysteretic material, note whether the field was rising or falling.
  4. Read μ in henries per metre, and divide by about 1.2566 × 10⁻⁶ if you want the relative permeability.

The formula.

μ = B / H

μ = B ÷ H. B is the magnetic flux density in tesla, the quantity that produces force on moving charges and induces voltage in a coil. H is the magnetic field strength in amperes per metre, the part of the field set by the currents in the windings. Since a tesla per ampere-per-metre equals a henry per metre, the result comes out directly in H/m. The relationship is a straight division, so doubling the measured flux density at the same field doubles the permeability. Relative permeability is μ divided by μ₀, which since the 2019 revision of the SI is a measured constant rather than exactly 4π × 10⁻⁷ H/m, though the two agree to better than one part in a billion.

A worked example.

Example

A coil of 400 turns wound over a 0.25 m path carries 1 A, setting up a field strength of 400 × 1 ÷ 0.25 = 1,600 A/m. With a sample inside, a probe reads a flux density of 0.0025 T. The permeability is 0.0025 ÷ 1,600 = 1.5625 × 10⁻⁶ H/m, or about 1.5625 microhenries per metre. In empty space the same field would give μ₀ × 1,600 = 0.00201 T, so the sample carries about 24% more flux than vacuum would. Its relative permeability is 1.5625 × 10⁻⁶ ÷ 1.25663706 × 10⁻⁶ = 1.2434: noticeably magnetic, but nowhere near the hundreds or thousands of a soft iron core.

magnetic Field Strength Am1,600
magnetic Flux Density T0.003

Frequently asked questions.

How do I get relative permeability from the result?
Divide by the permeability of free space, about 1.25663706 × 10⁻⁶ H/m. A result of 1.5625 × 10⁻⁶ H/m gives a relative permeability of 1.2434. Relative permeability has no units and is the figure most data sheets quote, so the conversion is usually the step you need before comparing materials.
My readings are in gauss and oersted. Can I still use this?
Convert first: 1 gauss is 0.0001 T and 1 oersted is about 79.577 A/m. In the older CGS system the ratio of gauss to oersted is the relative permeability directly, so 25 G at 20.106 Oe gives 1.2434, matching 0.0025 T at 1,600 A/m in SI units.
Why does the permeability of iron change as I increase the current?
Iron's B–H curve is not a straight line. At low fields the permeability climbs as magnetic domains begin to align, and as the material approaches saturation further increases in H add little extra B, so the ratio falls. The value from one B and H pair applies only at that operating point.
Why does the same field give different flux densities on the way up and on the way down?
That is hysteresis. Ferromagnetic materials remember their previous magnetisation, so B traces a different path as H increases than as it decreases. A permeability computed from a point on the descending branch will differ from one on the rising branch at the same H, which is why test methods specify how the sample is cycled.
Is this the same as the permeability on a ferrite core's data sheet?
Not necessarily. Data sheets usually quote initial permeability, measured at a very low field, or permeability measured at a stated frequency and flux level. The secant value from your own B and H can differ substantially, and at high frequency permeability becomes a complex quantity with losses that a single ratio cannot capture.

How this page was produced

Published by
Quanta Calculator
Primary sources
3 cited below
Method
μ = B / H
Published
Last verified

Built with AI assistance and verified by automated tests against the cited sources — every worked example on this page is computed by the same code that runs the calculator. How we build and check calculators.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 1560 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon