Audited 29 Jul 2026·Last updated 28 Oct 2026·6 citations·Tier 1·0 uses

Parallax Distance Calculator

Turn a star's parallax in milliarcseconds into parsecs, light-years, au and km, with the 1σ distance range and a check on whether d = 1/p can be trusted.

Parallax Distance Calculator

Gaia, Hipparcos and SIMBAD all publish parallaxes in mas. If your source quotes arcseconds, multiply by 1000 first. Must be greater than zero.
The catalogue's 1σ error bar, in the same units. Leave at 0 if you do not have one — you then get a single distance and no range. Must be smaller than the parallax.
Distance (parsecs, pc)
1.302
The distance in parsecs, 1 divided by the parallax in arcseconds.
Distance (light-years, ly)
4.2465
Distance (astronomical units, au)
268,550.7131
Distance (kilometres, km)
40,174,614,847,690.5
Distance modulus, μ = m − M (magnitudes)
-4.427
Parallax (arcseconds)
0.7681
Near end of 1σ range (pc)
1.3019
Far end of 1σ range (pc)
1.3021
Near end of 1σ range (ly)
4.2462
Far end of 1σ range (ly)
4.2467
Fractional parallax uncertainty (%)
0.0065
Is d = 1/p trustworthy here?
Fractional parallax uncertainty 0.0065% — comfortably inside the regime where d = 1/p is a reliable distance estimate.

Background.

Hold a finger at arm's length and look at it with one eye, then the other, and it jumps against the wall behind. Astronomers do the same thing with the Earth's orbit as the baseline. Six months apart, the Earth is about 300 million kilometres from where it was, and a nearby star shifts slightly against much more distant ones. Half of that yearly back-and-forth, measured as an angle, is the star's parallax p. For Proxima Centauri, the nearest star, it is 0.768 arcseconds — the width of a 2-centimetre coin seen from about 5.4 kilometres away — and every other star's is smaller.

Turning the angle into a distance takes one division. The parsec is defined as the distance at which one astronomical unit spans one arcsecond, so a star with a parallax of p arcseconds lies 1/p parsecs away, and with catalogue parallaxes in milliarcseconds, d = 1000/p. IAU 2015 Resolution B2 fixes the parsec at exactly 648,000/π au, so the conversion adds no uncertainty of its own: all of it arrives with the measured parallax.

That uncertainty decides whether the answer can be used. Because distance is the reciprocal of parallax, a symmetric error bar on p becomes a lopsided one on d, and Bailer-Jones (2015) showed that once the error reaches about 20 percent of the parallax, simple inversion stops being a sound distance estimate. Enter the catalogue's 1σ uncertainty along with the parallax and you get the near and far ends of the range, the fractional uncertainty and a note on which regime the measurement falls in, as well as the distance in parsecs, light-years, astronomical units and kilometres and the distance modulus.

Parallax is also where the cosmic distance scale begins. Cepheid variables, the tip of the red giant branch and Type Ia supernovae are calibrated against stars whose distances were fixed this way, so a systematic error in nearby parallaxes travels all the way up to estimates of how fast the universe is expanding.

What is parallax distance calculator?

Annual trigonometric parallax is half the angular displacement a star shows over a year as the Earth moves around the Sun, measured against a background of much more distant objects. It is quoted in milliarcseconds: one mas is a thousandth of an arcsecond, and an arcsecond is 1/3,600 of a degree. The distance is d = 1/p with p in arcseconds, giving parsecs; one parsec is 206,264.806 au, 3.2616 light-years or about 3.0857 × 10¹³ km. Friedrich Bessel made the first convincing stellar parallax measurement, of 61 Cygni, in 1838. The Hipparcos satellite later reached precisions of about a milliarcsecond, and Gaia's errors for bright stars are a few hundredths of a milliarcsecond, though many times larger for faint ones. The distance modulus μ = 5 log₁₀(d/pc) − 5 expresses the same distance on the magnitude scale: it is the apparent magnitude minus the absolute magnitude, zero at 10 parsecs and growing by 5 for every tenfold increase in distance.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Look up the star's parallax in SIMBAD, the Gaia archive or the Hipparcos catalogue; all three list it in milliarcseconds. Note which catalogue and data release you used, because different reductions of the same star genuinely disagree.
  2. Enter the parallax in mas. A value quoted in arcseconds needs multiplying by 1000 first; 0.37921″ becomes 379.21.
  3. Enter the catalogue's 1σ uncertainty in the same unit, or leave it at 0 for a single distance with no range. It has to be smaller than the parallax itself.
  4. Read the distance in parsecs, or in light-years for a general audience, and check the reliability note before quoting it. Below 2 percent fractional uncertainty the inversion is solid; between 2 and 20 percent it is usable with a lopsided range; at 20 percent or more it is only a rough guide.
  5. Carry the distance modulus to a magnitude calculation if you want the star's absolute magnitude: M = m − μ.

The formula.

d(pc) = 1 ⁄ p(arcsec) = 1000 ⁄ p(mas) · μ = 5 log₁₀ d(pc) − 5

The parallax in milliarcseconds is divided by 1000 to give arcseconds, and the distance in parsecs is the reciprocal: d = 1 ÷ p(″) = 1000 ÷ p(mas). The other units are fixed multiples. One parsec is 648,000/π au by the IAU definition; the au is exactly 149,597,870,700 m; and a light-year is the distance light travels in a Julian year of 365.25 days, which makes one parsec about 3.2616 light-years. The distance modulus is μ = 5 log₁₀(d) − 5 with d in parsecs.

The range comes from inverting both ends of the parallax interval rather than from a linear error formula. The larger parallax, p + σ, gives the near end; the smaller, p − σ, gives the far end. Because 1/p curves, the far end always sits further from the central value than the near end does. A 1 mas parallax with a 0.1 mas error puts the star at 1000 pc with a range of 909.09 to 1111.11 pc, 90.91 pc short and 111.11 pc long. At a 0.25 mas error the range runs from 800 to 1333.33 pc, and the far side is already two-thirds wider than the near side.

The reliability note reads the ratio σ/p: under 2 percent the inversion is described as reliable, from 2 up to 20 percent as usable but asymmetric, and at 20 percent or more as biased, following Bailer-Jones. A parallax of zero or below has no distance and is rejected, as is an uncertainty equal to or larger than the parallax, which would push the far end of the range to infinity.

Three real effects are outside the arithmetic. Gaia parallaxes carry a small zero-point offset that depends on magnitude, colour and position on the sky. An unresolved binary's light centre wobbles and can corrupt the fitted parallax. And when stars are chosen by their measured parallax — everything above a cut, or everything with a small relative error — the sample favours stars whose parallaxes scattered upward, so distances come out too small on average, a bias associated with Lutz and Kelker. Each can move a distance by more than its quoted error bar.

A worked example.

Example

Proxima Centauri's parallax in SIMBAD, from Gaia Early Data Release 3, is 768.0665 ± 0.0499 mas. In arcseconds that is exactly 768.0665 ÷ 1000 = 0.7680665″, and the distance is 1 ÷ 0.7680665 = 1.3020 pc, or 1.30197 to five figures. Multiplying by 3.2616 light-years per parsec gives 4.2465 ly; by 206,264.806 au per parsec, 268,550.7131 au; and in kilometres it is about 4.0175 × 10¹³ km, a little over 40 trillion. The distance modulus is 5 × log₁₀(1.30197) − 5 = −4.4270: negative because Proxima is far closer than the 10-parsec reference distance, so it appears brighter than its absolute magnitude. For the range, p + σ = 768.1164 mas gives a near end of 1.3019 pc (4.2462 ly), and p − σ = 768.0166 mas gives a far end of 1.3021 pc (4.2467 ly). The fractional uncertainty is 0.0499 ÷ 768.0665 = 0.0065%, far inside the reliable regime. At this precision the lopsidedness is invisible: the near end sits 0.00008458 pc below the central value and the far end 0.00008459 pc above it, a difference in the fourth significant figure of the error itself. The error bar also says how many digits mean something. An uncertainty of about 0.0003 light-years supports quoting Proxima at 4.2465 ly, five significant figures; any further digits on the screen are arithmetic, not astronomy.

parallax Mas768.067
parallax Uncertainty Mas0.05

Frequently asked questions.

My parallax is given in arcseconds. What should I enter?
Multiply it by 1000 and enter the result in milliarcseconds: Sirius at 0.37921 arcseconds becomes 379.21 mas, which gives 2.6371 pc or 8.6009 light-years. The parallax is echoed back in arcseconds among the results, so you can confirm the conversion landed where you expected. Modern catalogues all use mas because stellar parallaxes are almost all well below one arcsecond.
Is d = 1/p exact, or a small-angle approximation?
The small-angle step is built into the definition of the parsec, which IAU 2015 Resolution B2 fixes at exactly 648,000/π au, so d = 1/p is exact in parsecs. Measured against the strict trigonometry, the difference for Proxima's parallax is about five parts in a trillion, far below anything a telescope can detect. Every real uncertainty in the distance comes from the parallax measurement.
When does inverting the parallax stop giving a trustworthy distance?
When the fractional uncertainty σ/p reaches roughly 20 percent. Bailer-Jones (2015) showed that beyond that point 1/p is a biased estimator and recommended a Bayesian estimate with an explicit prior on distance, noting that a uniform prior performs poorly. Below a few percent the simple inversion and the Bayesian answer agree closely. For faint, distant stars, published Bayesian distance catalogues are the better source.
Why is my distance range lopsided?
Because the reciprocal curves. Equal steps in parallax correspond to unequal steps in distance, with the steps growing as the parallax shrinks, so the far end of the range is always the wider side. A 1 mas parallax with a 10 percent error spans 909.09 to 1111.11 pc. At 50 percent it spans 666.67 to 2000 pc — the far side is three times the near side, and the central 1000 pc means little.
Can a parallax be negative?
A measured one can; a physical one cannot. For very distant stars the true parallax is smaller than the measurement noise, so fitted values scatter on both sides of zero, and for sources with essentially no true parallax roughly half land below it. Catalogues such as Gaia's publish those negative values as they are. Inverting one would give a meaningless negative distance, so zero and negative parallaxes are rejected.
Why do different catalogues give different parallaxes for the same star?
A parallax is the output of a fitted astrometric solution, and solutions differ in their data, calibration and treatment of binarity. For α Centauri, van Leeuwen's 2007 re-reduction of Hipparcos gave 754.81 ± 4.11 mas, while Pourbaix and Boffin (2016) found 743 mas, close to the original Hipparcos value. Those give 1.3248 and 1.3459 pc, about 1.6 percent apart, which is why the source of a parallax should always be recorded with it.
What does the distance modulus tell me, and why is Proxima's negative?
The distance modulus is the gap between how bright a star appears and how bright it would appear from 10 parsecs: μ = m − M = 5 log₁₀(d) − 5. It is 0 at 10 pc, 5 at 100 pc and 10 at 1000 pc. Anything nearer than 10 pc has a negative modulus, so Proxima at 1.3020 pc comes out at −4.4270 and looks brighter than its absolute magnitude.
How far out can parallax measure distances?
It depends on the error bar rather than on the distance alone. A star at 1000 pc has a parallax of 1 mas. With an error of a few hundredths of a milliarcsecond, typical of Gaia for bright stars, that is a few percent and the inversion holds up. A faint star at the same distance with an error of 0.25 mas is already past the 20 percent line. Beyond that, distances come from standard candles calibrated on parallax.
What is Gaia's parallax zero-point, and should I correct for it?
Gaia parallaxes carry a small systematic offset, of order a few hundredths of a milliarcsecond, that varies with magnitude, colour and sky position. It is irrelevant for Proxima but not for distant stars: an offset of 0.02 mas is 2 percent of a 1 mas parallax, enough to move 1000 pc to 980.39 or 1020.41 pc depending on its sign. Apply the correction the Gaia documentation recommends before entering the value; it is not applied here.
Should I use parsecs or light-years?
They measure the same thing: one parsec is about 3.2616 light-years, where a light-year is the distance light travels in a Julian year of 365.25 days. Professional astronomy prefers the parsec because it falls straight out of the parallax, with no conversion constant. Light-years are more familiar to general readers, so both are shown, along with astronomical units and kilometres.

References& sources.

  1. [1]European Space Agency, Science & Technology education resource, "Stellar Distances" (retrieved 2026-07-29). Defines the parsec as "the distance at which an object has a parallax of one arcsecond", gives "d(parsec) = 1/p(arcsecond)", states "1 parsec = 3.26 light years", and gives the distance-modulus form M = m − 5 log(D/10). Independent of the IAU documents below; open access.
  2. [2]Mamajek, E. E., et al. (2015), "IAU 2015 Resolution B2 on Recommended Zero Points for the Absolute and Apparent Bolometric Magnitude Scales", arXiv:1510.06262 (retrieved 2026-07-29). The resolution text states the parsec is "exactly (648 000/π) au", giving 3.085 677 581 × 10¹⁶ m — the exact conversion used here. Open-access preprint of an adopted IAU resolution.
  3. [3]Bailer-Jones, C. A. L. (2015), "Estimating distances from parallaxes", Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 127 (October 2015); arXiv:1507.02105 (retrieved 2026-07-29). Shows that distance estimation by inverting the parallax breaks down once the fractional parallax error exceeds about 20%, affecting roughly 80% of Gaia's catalogue, and that a uniform distance prior performs poorly. Source of this page's 20% reliability threshold. Peer-reviewed; open-access preprint.
  4. [4]SIMBAD astronomical database (CDS, Strasbourg), object "Proxima Centauri": parallax 768.0665 ± 0.0499 mas, reference 2020yCat.1350....0G (Gaia Early Data Release 3). Retrieved 2026-07-29. Source of the worked example. Independent data centre; open access.
  5. [5]Pourbaix, D. & Boffin, H. M. J. (2016), "Parallax and masses of α Centauri revisited", Astronomy & Astrophysics 586, A90; arXiv:1601.01636 (retrieved 2026-07-29). Reports α Cen at 743 mas, "right where Hipparcos (ESA 1997) had put it", against van Leeuwen's 2007 re-reduction — the documented parallax disagreement quoted on this page. Peer-reviewed; open-access preprint.
  6. [6]van Leeuwen, F. (2007), "Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction", Astronomy & Astrophysics 474, 653–664; arXiv:0708.1752 (retrieved 2026-07-29). The re-reduction that supplies SIMBAD's parallaxes for bright stars such as Sirius (379.21 ± 1.58 mas), used as an independent check on this page. Peer-reviewed; open-access preprint.

How this page was produced

Published by
Quanta Calculator
Primary sources
6 cited below
Method
d(pc) = 1 ⁄ p(arcsec) = 1000 ⁄ p(mas) · μ = 5 log₁₀ d(pc) − 5
Published
Last verified

Built with AI assistance and verified by automated tests against the cited sources — every worked example on this page is computed by the same code that runs the calculator. How we build and check calculators.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 1560 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon