Audited ·Last updated ·5 citations·Tier 1·0 uses

Screen Size Calculator

Turn an advertised screen diagonal into real width, height and area — or measure a panel and get its diagonal and aspect ratio. Inches and centimetres.

Screen Size Calculator

What do you know?
The number on the box — 43, 55, 65, 77. This is the corner-to-corner measurement of the viewable panel only, not the outer bezel.
in
16 for a normal TV or monitor (16:9), 16 for 16:10, 21 for an ultrawide, 4 for an old 4:3 set, 32 for a super-ultrawide.
9 for 16:9 and 21:9, 10 for 16:10, 3 for 4:3, 2 for 3:2, 9 for 32:9.
Used only in the second mode. Measure the lit area of the panel, edge to edge, ignoring the bezel.
in
Used only in the second mode. Measure the lit area top to bottom, in the same units as the width.
in
Screen width
47.9367
The horizontal size of the viewable panel — the number that decides whether the screen fits the alcove, the desk or the AV unit.
Screen height
26.9644 in
Diagonal
55 in
Screen width
121.7591 cm
Screen height
68.4895 cm
Diagonal
139.7 cm
Picture area
1,292.5816 sq in
Picture area
8.9763 sq ft
Aspect ratio as a decimal
1.7778
Aspect ratio
16:9

Background.

A screen is sold by one number — 43, 55, 65, 77 inches — and that number is a diagonal, not a width. On its own it tells you almost nothing about whether the television will fit the alcove, whether the monitor will leave room for a second one, or how much bigger the upgrade really is. This calculator does the geometry that turns the marketing number into the two measurements that actually matter: how wide the panel is and how tall it is, in inches and centimetres, along with the picture area and the exact aspect ratio.

The conversion is pure Pythagoras. A screen with sides in the ratio a to b has a width of a·k and a height of b·k for some common scale factor k, and the diagonal closes the right-angled triangle formed by those two sides. Setting D² = (a·k)² + (b·k)² and solving gives k = D ÷ √(a² + b²), after which the width and height fall straight out. For the near-universal 16:9 shape, √(16² + 9²) = √337 ≈ 18.3576, so a 55-inch panel works out at 47.94 inches wide and 26.96 inches tall — a full seven inches narrower than most people guess when they hear "55 inches".

That 16:9 shape is not an arbitrary industry habit. Recommendation ITU-R BT.709, the parameter set behind essentially all HDTV production and international programme exchange, specifies an aspect ratio of 16:9 with 1 920 samples per active line, 1 080 active lines per picture, and a pixel aspect ratio of 1:1 — square pixels. Recommendation ITU-R BT.2020 carries the same 16:9 shape forward to the 3 840 × 2 160 and 7 680 × 4 320 ultra-high-definition formats. The older 4:3 shape, still found on legacy monitors and broadcast archives, is documented alongside 16:9 in Recommendation ITU-R BT.601. Because all of these formats use square pixels, the pixel ratio and the physical ratio are the same number, which is what makes a simple geometric calculation legitimate.

The area output deserves a moment of attention, because it is the figure that exposes how misleading diagonals can be. Screen area is width times height — which is precisely how Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/2013 defines the screen area of an electronic display for energy-label purposes. Rearranged, area = D²·ab ÷ (a² + b²), so for a fixed diagonal the area depends on the shape as well as the size. A 34-inch 21:9 ultrawide and a 34-inch 16:9 monitor share a diagonal but not a picture area: the wider panel is flatter, so it loses height faster than it gains width. Comparing two screens by diagonal alone quietly compares two different quantities.

The centimetre outputs are exact rather than approximate. The inch has been defined since 1 July 1959 as exactly 25.4 millimetres, a value NIST publishes as a definition rather than a measurement, so the conversion introduces no error of its own. Everything here is computed in arbitrary-precision decimal arithmetic and rounded only at the final display step.

The second mode runs the calculation backwards. If you have a tape measure and an actual panel — a second-hand monitor with no model number, a screen already on the wall, a projector image you want to characterise — enter the measured width and height and the calculator returns the diagonal it would be advertised at, the ratio reduced to lowest terms by the Euclidean algorithm, and the same area figures. Measure the lit area of the panel only: manufacturers quote the viewable diagonal, so including the bezel will inflate your answer by an inch or more.

What is screen size calculator?

Screen size is the length of the diagonal across the viewable area of a display, measured from one corner of the lit panel to the opposite corner and quoted in inches in North America and in centimetres in most of the rest of the world. It deliberately excludes the bezel, the frame and the stand, which is why a screen measured across its outer casing always reads larger than its advertised size.

A diagonal on its own is an incomplete description, because two screens with the same diagonal can have very different widths, heights and picture areas depending on their aspect ratio. Width and height are recovered from the diagonal by treating the screen as a right-angled triangle: the two sides are in the known ratio, the diagonal is the hypotenuse, and Pythagoras' theorem fixes the scale. The picture area — the quantity that actually corresponds to how much image you see — is then the product of that width and height, matching the regulatory definition of screen area used on EU energy labels.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Choose whether you know the advertised diagonal (the usual case) or you have measured a physical panel.
  2. Enter the diagonal in inches — the figure on the box, which refers to the viewable panel and not the outer bezel.
  3. Enter the aspect ratio as two numbers: 16 and 9 for almost every modern TV and monitor, 16 and 10 for many productivity monitors, 21 and 9 for an ultrawide, 4 and 3 for a legacy display.
  4. Read the width and height in inches and centimetres — these are the numbers to compare against your alcove, wall recess, desk depth or AV unit.
  5. Check the picture area if you are comparing two screens of different shapes; equal diagonals do not mean equal area.
  6. To go the other way, switch to the measured mode and enter the width and height of the lit area; the calculator returns the diagonal the screen would be sold as, plus its aspect ratio in lowest terms.

The formula.

k = D ÷ √(a² + b²); W = a·k; H = b·k; Area = W·H

Treat the screen as a rectangle whose width and height are in a known ratio a : b. Both sides therefore share a single unknown scale factor k, giving W = a·k and H = b·k. The diagonal is the hypotenuse of the right-angled triangle formed by those two sides, so by Pythagoras' theorem D² = W² + H² = (a·k)² + (b·k)² = k²(a² + b²). Solving for the scale factor gives k = D ÷ √(a² + b²), and the width and height follow immediately as a·k and b·k.

Running that on the default 16:9 shape: a² + b² = 256 + 81 = 337, and √337 = 18.35755975. For a 55-inch diagonal, k = 55 ÷ 18.35755975 = 2.99604091. The width is 16 × 2.99604091 = 47.93665456 inches and the height is 9 × 2.99604091 = 26.96436819 inches. Squaring and adding those two returns 3 025, which is 55² exactly — the check that the geometry closed correctly.

The area formula is worth writing out in full because it explains a counter-intuitive result. Substituting the width and height gives Area = a·b·k² = D²·ab ÷ (a² + b²). The diagonal enters squared, but so does the shape term ab ÷ (a² + b²), which peaks for a square panel and shrinks as the rectangle gets longer and thinner. For 16:9 that term is 144/337 = 0.4273; for 21:9 it is 189/522 = 0.3621. A 34-inch 21:9 screen therefore has roughly 15 per cent less picture area than a 34-inch 16:9 screen would, despite the identical advertised size.

The reverse direction needs no ratio input at all. Given a measured width and height, the diagonal is simply √(W² + H²), and the aspect ratio is the pair W : H reduced to lowest terms by dividing both by their greatest common divisor — found with the Euclidean algorithm, the same repeated-remainder procedure used to simplify an ordinary fraction. A measured 3 440 × 1 440 ultrawide reduces to 43 : 18, which is why that panel is marketed loosely as "21:9" even though it is not exactly that ratio.

A worked example.

Example

A 55-inch 16:9 television has to go into an alcove, and the question is whether it fits. Start with the shape term: 16² + 9² = 337, and √337 = 18.3576. The scale factor is k = 55 ÷ 18.3576 = 2.9960. The panel is therefore 16 × 2.9960 = 47.94 inches wide and 9 × 2.9960 = 26.96 inches tall — 121.76 cm by 68.49 cm. Note how far the width sits below the advertised 55: an alcove that is 50 inches across clears the panel, but not the bezel and mounting hardware that surround it. Multiplying width by height gives a picture area of 1 292.58 square inches, or 8.98 square feet. Squaring the two sides and adding them returns 47.9367² + 26.9644² = 3 025, exactly 55², confirming the geometry closed.

modefrom-diagonal
diagonal In55
width In47.937
height In26.964
ratio Width16
ratio Height9

Frequently asked questions.

How wide is a 55-inch TV?
A 55-inch 16:9 television is 47.94 inches (121.76 cm) wide and 26.96 inches (68.49 cm) tall. The width comes out roughly 13 per cent below the advertised diagonal because the diagonal cuts across the rectangle rather than along it: with a 16:9 shape, the width is always 16 ÷ √337 = 0.8716 times the diagonal, and the height is 9 ÷ √337 = 0.4903 times it. Add an inch or two on each side for the bezel and any wall bracket before deciding a space is big enough.
Is a TV's screen size measured diagonally?
Yes. The advertised size is the distance from one corner of the viewable panel to the opposite corner, excluding the bezel, frame and stand. That is why a screen measured across its outer casing reads larger than its label. The convention has been in place since the cathode-ray-tube era, when the picture tube's face was round and the diagonal was the only dimension that described the whole usable circle sensibly; it survived into flat panels and is now universal.
Do two screens with the same diagonal have the same picture area?
Only if they have the same aspect ratio. Area for a fixed diagonal works out as D² × ab ÷ (a² + b²), so the shape term matters as much as the size. For 16:9 that term is 144/337 = 0.4273; for a 21:9 ultrawide it is 189/522 = 0.3621. A 34-inch 21:9 monitor therefore shows about 15 per cent less picture area than a 34-inch 16:9 monitor would — the extra width is paid for out of height, and then some. Compare the area output, not the diagonal, when the two screens are different shapes.
Why is 16:9 the standard aspect ratio?
It was standardised, not stumbled into. Recommendation ITU-R BT.709, the international parameter set for HDTV production and programme exchange, specifies an aspect ratio of 16:9 with 1 920 samples per active line, 1 080 active lines and square (1:1) pixels. Recommendation ITU-R BT.2020 keeps the same 16:9 shape for the 3 840 × 2 160 and 7 680 × 4 320 ultra-high-definition formats. The earlier Recommendation ITU-R BT.601 documents 16:9 alongside the older standard-definition 4:3 shape, which is where the transitional generation of widescreen broadcast came from.
How do I convert screen inches to centimetres exactly?
Multiply by 2.54. This is an exact definition rather than a rounded approximation: NIST records that the inch, derived from the international yard adopted on 1 July 1959, is exactly equivalent to 25.4 millimetres. A 55-inch diagonal is therefore exactly 139.7 cm, and a 65-inch diagonal is exactly 165.1 cm. Many European retailers list the centimetre figure first, so a set advertised as 139 cm and one advertised as 55 inches are the same screen rounded differently.
What aspect ratio numbers should I enter for my screen?
Enter 16 and 9 for virtually every modern television, and for most monitors and laptops. Enter 16 and 10 for productivity monitors and many tablets and MacBooks. Enter 21 and 9 for a cinema-shaped ultrawide, 32 and 9 for a super-ultrawide, 4 and 3 for a legacy monitor or an older broadcast display, and 3 and 2 for a Surface-style tablet. If you are unsure, divide the horizontal pixel count by the vertical pixel count and compare: 1.7778 is 16:9, 1.6 is 16:10, 1.5 is 3:2, 1.3333 is 4:3.
My 3440x1440 monitor is sold as 21:9 — is that right?
Not exactly. Reducing 3 440 : 1 440 to lowest terms with the Euclidean algorithm gives 43 : 18, a decimal ratio of 2.3889, while a true 21:9 is 2.3333. The marketing label rounds to a familiar cinema-sounding number. The calculator reports the exact reduced ratio, so entering the measured width and height of an ultrawide will return 43:18 rather than 21:9 — that is the panel telling you the truth about its own shape, not an error.
Does the calculator account for the bezel or the stand?
No, and neither does the manufacturer's advertised size. Every figure here describes the viewable panel only, which is the same convention used for the advertised diagonal and for the screen-area definition in EU Regulation 2019/2013 (viewable image width multiplied by viewable image height). Real products add a bezel of anything from a few millimetres on a modern television to a couple of centimetres on an older monitor, plus feet or a wall bracket. When checking a physical space, take the calculated width and height and add the outer dimensions from the manufacturer's own spec sheet.
How much bigger is a 65-inch screen than a 55-inch one?
Linearly it is 18 per cent bigger, but in picture area it is 40 per cent bigger — area scales with the square of the diagonal when the shape is unchanged. A 55-inch 16:9 panel is 47.94 × 26.96 inches for 1 292.6 square inches; a 65-inch panel of the same shape is 56.65 × 31.87 inches for 1 805.5 square inches. That squared relationship is why an upgrade of two size steps feels far more dramatic than the diagonal numbers suggest, and why viewing-distance recommendations change so sharply with screen size.
Can I use this for a projector screen or a phone?
Yes — the geometry is scale-free and applies to any rectangle described by a diagonal and a ratio. A 120-inch 16:9 projector screen is 104.6 inches wide and 58.8 inches tall; a 6.1-inch phone with a 19.5:9 display is 2.58 inches wide and 5.59 inches tall (enter 9 and 19.5 for a portrait screen, since the first number is whichever side you are calling the width). The one caveat for projectors is that the advertised screen size refers to the fabric's viewing area, so allow for the border and frame separately.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 590 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon