Audited 31 Jul 2026·Last updated 28 Oct 2026·5 citations·Tier 2·0 uses

Cake Pan Converter

Swap cake pans by base area: the factor to scale your recipe by, each pan's capacity in cups, the new batter depth and whether unscaled batter fits.

Cake Pan Converter

Original pan shape
Inside measurement
Rectangular pans only
New pan shape
Inside measurement
Rectangular pans only
60% is mid-range of the published half-to-two-thirds rule
Multiply the recipe by
1.0875
The number to multiply every ingredient by so the batter sits at the recipe's original depth in the new pans.
New pan filled to
55.17
Will it fit?
Inside the published half-to-two-thirds range — this swap works without scaling the recipe.
Bake time
Shallower batter than the original. King Arthur: a cake in a larger pan bakes more quickly — start checking 10 to 15 minutes before the stated time.
New batter depth
1.1035
Batter the recipe makes
9.7247
Original pan area
117
New pan area
127.2345
Original pan capacity (to the brim)
16.2078
New pan capacity (to the brim)
17.6256

Background.

Two inches of diameter sounds trivial, yet a 10-inch round cake pan covers 78.54 square inches and an 8-inch round only 50.27. To bake a layer of the same thickness, the bigger pan needs 1.5625 times the batter. Pan area grows with the square of the diameter, which is why swapping pans by eye so often ends in a thin, dry layer or batter creeping over the rim.

The comparison here is by footprint area, the method King Arthur Baking publishes: round pans measured as π times the radius squared, square and rectangular pans as length times width. Matching area keeps the batter at the depth the recipe was designed for, and depth decides how long the centre takes to set and how dark the edges get. Two pans that hold the same volume can still bake quite differently if one is wide and shallow and the other narrow and tall.

There are two ways to act on the answer. Multiply every ingredient by the scale factor, and the batter sits at exactly its original depth in the new pans. Or keep the recipe as written and look at how full the new pans would be: the verdict checks that against the half-to-two-thirds fill range Wilton and King Arthur both give, and the bake-time note tells you whether to start testing early or expect a longer bake.

All dimensions are inside measurements in inches, and capacities are in US cups.

What is cake pan converter?

Converting between cake pans means comparing total base areas: the combined footprint of the pans you will bake in, divided by the combined footprint of the pans the recipe names. The count matters as much as the size. A layer-cake recipe written for a pair of 8-inch rounds has 100.53 square inches to fill, not 50.27. The ratio is the factor applied to every ingredient, flour and salt alike; above 1 the new pans are larger, below 1 they are smaller. A separate figure, each pan's brim capacity, is its volume filled to the top edge, which tells you whether a given quantity of batter can physically fit.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Choose the shape of the pan the recipe was written for and enter its inside measurements in inches: diameter for a round pan, side for a square, length and width for a rectangle. Measure across the base rather than the rolled rim, because most pans taper slightly.
  2. Add that pan's depth and how many the recipe uses. Layer-cake recipes usually call for two or three.
  3. Do the same for the pans you plan to use. A loaf pan counts as rectangular and a straight-sided springform as round.
  4. Set how full the original pan was. If the recipe does not say, 60% sits in the middle of the half-to-two-thirds range.
  5. Read 'Multiply the recipe by' if you intend to scale, or the fill percentage and verdict if you would rather bake the recipe unchanged.

The formula.

f = (n₂ · A₂) ⁄ (n₁ · A₁)

The scale factor is f = (n₂ × A₂) ÷ (n₁ × A₁), where A is the base area of one pan and n the number of pans; subscript 1 is the recipe's pan and 2 is yours. A round pan's area is π × (d ÷ 2)², a square's is s² and a rectangle's is L × W. Because area follows the square of a length, modest changes in diameter move the recipe a long way.

Capacity is total area × depth in cubic inches, divided by 14.4375 to give US cups. That divisor is exact: the US gallon is defined as 231 cubic inches and holds 16 cups, and 231 ÷ 16 = 14.4375.

The batter the recipe makes is the original pans' capacity times the fill percentage you enter. Poured unscaled into the new pans, it spreads to a depth of batter volume ÷ new total area, and that depth as a share of the new pans' height is the fill percentage reported. The verdict places it in one of four bands: more than the brim, above two-thirds, from one-half to two-thirds inclusive, or below one-half.

The bake-time note compares that unscaled depth with the batter's depth in the original pan. Within 2% either way the timing is treated as unchanged; shallower batter means checking 10 to 15 minutes early, deeper batter up to 10 to 15 minutes longer, following King Arthur's guidance. π is used at full precision, so a 9-inch round comes to 63.62 square inches, a shade under the 64 of the 8-inch square that baking guides treat as its equivalent.

A worked example.

Example

A sheet-cake recipe is written for one 9 × 13 × 2-inch pan, and the cupboard holds two 9-inch rounds, 2 inches deep. The sheet pan's base is 13 × 9 = 117 square inches. One round is π × 4.5² = 63.62 square inches, so the pair covers 127.2345. The factor is 127.2345 ÷ 117 = 1.0875: about 9% more of every ingredient puts the batter at the depth the recipe intended. Is scaling needed at all? The sheet pan holds 117 × 2 = 234 cubic inches to the brim, which is 234 ÷ 14.4375 = 16.2078 cups, and at 60% full the recipe makes 9.7247 cups of batter. Spread over 127.2345 square inches, that batter stands 1.1035 inches deep, 55.17% of the rounds' 2-inch height. That falls inside the half-to-two-thirds range, so the recipe can go in as written. The layers start a little thinner than the sheet cake did, 1.1 inches against 1.2, so begin testing them 10 to 15 minutes before the stated time.

from Pan Count1
from Shaperectangular
to Shaperound
to Dim19
to Pan Count2
from Dim113
to Depth In2
to Dim29
from Dim29
original Fill Percent60
from Depth In2

Frequently asked questions.

Can I bake a 9 × 13 recipe in two 8-inch round pans?
Not without trimming it. Two 8-inch rounds cover 100.53 square inches against the sheet pan's 117, so the 9.7247 cups a 60%-full 9 × 13 holds would climb to 69.83% of their 2-inch sides, past the two-thirds limit; King Arthur warns about overflow with exactly this swap. Multiply the recipe by 0.8592, or bake the extra batter as cupcakes.
Is an 8-inch square pan really the same as a 9-inch round?
Near enough. The square covers 64 square inches and the round 63.62, a factor of 0.994, and at 2 inches deep they hold 8.8658 and 8.8128 cups to the brim. The difference in batter depth is under 2%, so the original bake time holds, which is why King Arthur treats the two as interchangeable for cakes and bars.
How much more batter does a 9 × 13 need than a 9-inch square?
The rectangle is 117 square inches and the square 81, so the factor is 117 ÷ 81 = 1.4444. Poured unscaled, a recipe that filled the square to 60% would reach only 41.54% of the 9 × 13, below half, giving a thin layer that bakes fast and browns hard. Rounding the factor up to 1.5 is easier to measure and leaves a slightly thicker cake.
How do I scale from an 8-inch round to a 10- or 12-inch round?
Square the ratio of the diameters. A 10-inch round is (10 ÷ 8)² = 1.5625 times an 8-inch, and a 12-inch is (12 ÷ 8)² = 2.25 times. Without scaling, batter that filled an 8-inch pan to 60% would sit only 26.67% up the sides of a 12-inch pan, so a recipe for a party-sized layer needs more than double.
How full should a deep cake pan be?
Wilton's half-to-two-thirds rule comes with a caveat that pans 3 inches deep should be filled only half full, and not every baking source agrees on deep pans, so the verdict here applies only the shared half and two-thirds limits. A 9 × 13 recipe poured into one 10 × 3-inch round reaches 59.59% and is reported as inside the range, but its batter stands 1.7876 inches deep against 1.2 in the sheet pan. By Wilton's deep-pan rule that is too full, and either way it needs a much longer bake.
Why doesn't the capacity in cups match what charts give for my pan?
The figures here are brim volumes of a straight-sided pan. Pan charts often list batter amounts instead; Wilton's figures for 2-inch pans assume the pan is two-thirds full. A 9 × 2-inch round holds 8.8128 cups to the rim, so two-thirds of it is about 5.88 cups. Sloped sides also make a real pan hold a little less than area times depth.

How this page was produced

Published by
Quanta Calculator
Primary sources
5 cited below
Method
f = (n₂ · A₂) ⁄ (n₁ · A₁)
Published
Last verified

Built with AI assistance and verified by automated tests against the cited sources — every worked example on this page is computed by the same code that runs the calculator. How we build and check calculators.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 1560 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon