Audited 31 Jul 2026·Last updated 28 Oct 2026·3 citations·Tier 2·0 uses

Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculator

Back-calculate a heat-transfer coefficient in W/(m²·K) from a measured heat rate, the area it crosses and the temperature difference driving it.

Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculator

W
m²
K
Effective heat-transfer coefficient
15
The effective heat-transfer coefficient in W/(m²·K): watts crossing each square metre for every kelvin of temperature difference.
Model scope
Effective coefficient from stated measurements; it does not distinguish convection from an overall U value, select local/mean ΔT, or infer radiation, fouling, geometry, flow regime, and property variation.

Background.

Stand in a breeze on a cool day and you lose heat faster than in still air at the same temperature. That difference, how readily heat crosses between a surface and a fluid for each degree of temperature gap, is what a heat-transfer coefficient measures. Still air is a poor carrier: the typical-values table in Incropera's heat-transfer textbook puts free convection in gases at 2 to 25 W/(m²·K). Blow the air and the range becomes 25 to 250; pump a liquid past the surface and it runs from 100 to 20,000; boiling or condensing fluids reach 2,500 to 100,000.

Predicting a coefficient from first principles is hard. Correlations for each geometry and flow are approximate, so engineers often work the other way round and measure: supply a known heat rate, measure the area and the temperature difference, and divide. That back-calculation is what happens here.

The result is an effective coefficient. It contains everything that happened between the two temperatures you measured. Across a heated panel in a room, that includes radiation as well as convection. Across a heat-exchanger tube, it includes both fluid films, the metal wall and any scale or deposit, which makes it an overall U value rather than a single film coefficient. Which of these you have depends entirely on where the temperatures were taken, and the arithmetic cannot tell them apart.

That is also what makes it a good diagnostic. An exchanger whose measured coefficient drifts down month after month is fouling, and plotting the figure over time shows when cleaning will pay for itself. A test rig that returns a value far outside the expected range more often has a misplaced thermocouple or an uncounted heat loss than new physics.

What is heat transfer coefficient calculator?

A heat-transfer coefficient is the rate of heat flow per unit area per kelvin of temperature difference, in watts per square metre per kelvin, W/(m²·K). A convection coefficient h describes one surface and the fluid moving past it; an overall coefficient U describes the full path through a wall or exchanger from one fluid to another. Both share the unit and the defining equation, and the reciprocal, 1/h or 1/U, is a thermal resistance per unit area in m²·K/W.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Enter the heat-transfer rate in watts, measured once conditions are steady. For an electric heater it is the power drawn; for a fluid stream it is mass flow × specific heat × that stream's temperature change.
  2. Enter the area heat actually crosses, in square metres. For a tube, choose the inside or the outside surface and stick with it, because the coefficient changes with that choice.
  3. Enter the temperature difference in kelvin; a difference in °C is the same number, and one in °F should be divided by 1.8. For a surface in a fluid, use surface temperature minus bulk fluid temperature; for a heat exchanger, use the log-mean temperature difference.
  4. Compare the result with the range expected for your situation, remembering that it includes radiation and any other path between your two measuring points.

The formula.

h = Q̇ / (AΔT)

h = Q̇ ÷ (A × ΔT), where Q̇ is the heat-transfer rate in watts, A the area in square metres and ΔT the temperature difference in kelvin. It is Newton's law of cooling, Q̇ = h × A × ΔT, rearranged to give the coefficient. The coefficient rises in direct proportion to the heat rate and falls in inverse proportion to both area and temperature difference, so a 10% error in any one input becomes an error of roughly 9 to 10% in h. The temperature difference is usually the weakest link: with only 10 K between surface and fluid, a thermocouple reading one degree off shifts the coefficient by about 10%. All three inputs must be positive. Nothing here predicts h from fluid properties or flow speed; correlations built on Reynolds, Prandtl and Nusselt numbers do that, and measured coefficients are what those correlations are tested against. The result is rounded to 12 significant figures.

A worked example.

Example

An electrically heated panel draws 1,500 W at steady state, has 5 m² of surface and sits 20 K warmer than the surrounding air. The area times the temperature difference is 5 × 20 = 100 m²·K, and 1,500 ÷ 100 = 15 W/(m²·K). That falls inside the 2 to 25 W/(m²·K) typical of free convection in gases, which suits a panel in still room air, but the measured figure also carries radiation. For a high-emissivity surface (ε = 0.9) near 300 K, the linearised radiation coefficient 4εσT³ comes to about 5.51 W/(m²·K), leaving roughly 9.49 for convection itself. Had the same 1,500 W held the panel only 10 K above the air, the coefficient would be 30 W/(m²·K), a sign of a draught or fan.

transfer Area M25
heat Transfer Rate W1,500
temperature Difference K20

Frequently asked questions.

Have I measured a convection coefficient h or an overall U value?
It depends on where your two temperatures were taken. Surface temperature and fluid temperature give a film coefficient h for that surface. Fluid temperatures on both sides of a wall or tube give an overall U, which combines both films, the wall and any fouling into one figure.
How much does it matter which temperature difference I use for a heat exchanger?
A lot when the ends differ. With 60 K at one end and 10 K at the other, the log-mean difference is about 27.9 K but the simple average is 35 K, so using the average gives a coefficient about 20% too low. When both ends are similar, the two agree closely.
My result seems high for still air. What could be inflating it?
Radiation is the usual cause, worth roughly 5 to 6 W/(m²·K) for a dull surface near room temperature. Heat escaping through mountings or the back face also counts in the measured power without adding to the area, and a draught you have not noticed raises the convection itself.
How do I convert W/(m²·K) to Btu per hour per square foot per °F?
Divide by about 5.678, because 1 Btu/(h·ft²·°F) equals roughly 5.678 W/(m²·K). The page's example of 15 W/(m²·K) is therefore about 2.64 Btu/(h·ft²·°F). If your temperature difference was in °F, convert it to kelvin first by dividing by 1.8.
Why would a measured coefficient fall over time?
In heat exchangers the usual reason is fouling: scale, biological growth or sediment builds an extra insulating layer on the surfaces. Each layer adds thermal resistance in series, so the overall coefficient drops, and tracking it is a standard way to schedule cleaning.
How does the coefficient relate to an R-value?
Its reciprocal is a thermal resistance per unit area. A coefficient of 15 W/(m²·K) corresponds to about 0.0667 m²·K/W, which is how surface films are entered when a wall's layer resistances are added up to find its overall R-value and U-value.

How this page was produced

Published by
Quanta Calculator
Primary sources
3 cited below
Method
h = Q̇ / (AΔT)
Published
Last verified

Built with AI assistance and verified by automated tests against the cited sources — every worked example on this page is computed by the same code that runs the calculator. How we build and check calculators.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 1560 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon