Audited 28 Jul 2026·Last updated 28 Oct 2026·4 citations·Tier 2·0 uses

NFL Draft Pick Value Calculator (Trade Chart)

Score an NFL draft-pick trade on the Jimmy Johnson trade chart or Chase Stuart's Approximate Value chart: each side's points, the gap and the return percentage.

NFL Draft Pick Value Calculator

Valuation chart
Overall pick numbers separated by commas, e.g. "6, 81". Not round-and-slot — pick 33 is the first pick of round two.
Leave empty to just value the first team's picks instead of comparing two sides.
First team's outlay
1,300
Total chart points for the picks the first team gives up: Johnson points from 3,000 at pick 1 down to 2 at pick 224, or Stuart points from 34.6 down to 0.1.
Second team's outlay
1,140
Difference
160
Return on outlay
87.69
Reading
The first team is giving up more on the Jimmy Johnson trade-market chart — the second team returns only 87.7%, a shortfall of 160 points.

Background.

When two NFL teams swap draft picks, the haggling happens in points. Every selection has a number on a value chart, each side adds up what it is sending, and deals tend to close when the totals are close. The chart most teams have used for this is named after Jimmy Johnson, from his years coaching the Dallas Cowboys. It gives the first overall pick 3,000 points, the tenth 1,300, the last pick of round one 590, and the 224th and final pick of a seven-round draft just 2. It has no official standing, yet Massey and Thaler, in their 2013 study of the draft, report that every NFL team keeps such a table.

A price list is not the same as a measure of what the picks deliver. Chase Stuart built a second chart from Approximate Value, Pro-Football-Reference's single-number rating of each player season, so it reflects what players drafted at each slot went on to produce. It is much flatter at the top. On the Johnson chart the first pick is worth 2.31 times the tenth and 5.08 times the 32nd; on Stuart's it is worth 1.74 times the tenth and 2.77 times the 32nd.

That difference is the subject of Massey and Thaler's paper, The Loser's Curse: if the market prices early picks more steeply than their on-field output justifies, the team trading down tends to come out ahead. You can see it for yourself by entering a real trade and switching charts. Deals that land almost exactly level on the Johnson chart often tilt clearly towards the team that collected more, later picks once they are scored by production.

Both charts stop at pick 224, seven rounds of 32. Recent drafts have run past 250 selections because of compensatory picks, and anything after 224 scores zero on both charts. Players, future-year picks and conditions attached to a trade have no pick number, so they cannot be scored at all.

What is nfl draft pick value calculator?

A draft value chart assigns points to every overall selection so that packages of different sizes can be compared. The Johnson chart is a record of trade prices, descending from 3,000 at pick 1 to 2 at pick 224. Stuart's chart runs from 34.6 at pick 1 to 0.1 at pick 224 and is built from the Approximate Value that players taken in each slot went on to earn. Summing a side's picks on either chart gives its outlay; comparing two sides shows which one is paying more by that chart's measure.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Choose the chart: Johnson for what the trade market would charge, Stuart for what the picks are expected to be worth on the field.
  2. Enter the overall pick numbers the first team gives up, separated by commas, for example 6, 81. Use overall numbers, not round and slot: pick 33 is the first pick of round two, and pick 65 the first of round three.
  3. Enter the picks the second team gives up in the second box, or leave it empty to value one package on its own.
  4. Read the return percentage as the second team's package measured against the first team's. Between 95% and 105% is read as essentially even; above 105% the second team is paying more, below 95% the first team is.
  5. Switch to the other chart and compare. A trade that is level on Johnson but well above or below 100% on Stuart is one where price and expected production point in different directions.

The formula.

V(team) = Σ chart[pick] · difference = V(A) − V(B) · return = V(B) ⁄ V(A) × 100

Each pick number is looked up in the chosen chart, and the values for each side are added: V(A) is the total the first team sends and V(B) the total the second team sends. The difference is V(A) − V(B), so a positive number means the first team is giving up more. The return percentage is V(B) ÷ V(A) × 100. If the first team's picks are all beyond pick 224 and score zero, no ratio can be formed; the percentage is shown as 0 and the reading says why.

The chart values come from the nflverse draft_values dataset, which carries both charts for picks 1 to 262 and gives every pick after 224 a value of zero. Overall numbers from 1 to 262 are accepted, and any pick past 224 is named in the reading so you know it added nothing.

The two charts differ in shape most of all. The Johnson chart's first round is worth 37,065 points against 13,312 for the second round, nearly three to one. Stuart's chart puts round one at 587.8 and round two at 319.9, less than two to one. Massey and Thaler also found the market's pricing had grown steeper over time, with the tenth pick falling from 60% of the first pick's value to 39%.

One caution for late picks: both charts were laid out for a 224-pick draft, while in a modern draft compensatory selections at the ends of rounds three to seven push later overall numbers back, so a pick's number and its place within its round no longer line up as they did.

A worked example.

Example

On 27 April 2023 Detroit sent picks 6 and 81 to Arizona for picks 12, 34 and 168. Enter 6, 81 for the first team and 12, 34, 168 for the second, on the Johnson chart. Detroit's side is 1,600 for pick 6 plus 185 for pick 81, a total of 1,785. Arizona's side is 1,200 for pick 12, 560 for pick 34 and 24 for pick 168, a total of 1,784. The difference is a single point, and Arizona's package returns 1,784 ÷ 1,785 = 99.94% of Detroit's: essentially even, as a negotiated trade on this chart is expected to be. On Stuart's chart the same picks score 23.2 + 6.6 = 29.8 for Detroit's side and 18.8 + 12.1 + 2.0 = 32.9 for Arizona's, a return of 110.4%. By expected production Detroit, the team moving down six places and gaining an early second-round pick, received about a tenth more than it gave, which is the pattern Massey and Thaler describe.

team B Picks12, 34, 168
team A Picks6, 81
valuation Chartjohnson

Frequently asked questions.

Which chart should I trust?
Neither is the right one in general. The Johnson chart predicts what a trade will cost, because it describes how teams price picks. Stuart's chart estimates whether that price buys equivalent production. When the two agree the deal is uncontroversial; when they disagree, the gap is the premium the team moving up paid for the earlier pick.
How do I convert a round and slot into an overall pick number?
Multiply the completed rounds by 32 and add the slot: the 10th pick of round two is 32 + 10 = 42. In a real draft, forfeited picks and the compensatory picks added at the end of rounds three to seven shift the numbering, so take the overall number from the published draft order where you can.
Why is my seventh-round compensatory pick worth zero?
Both charts assign values only to picks 1 to 224, the length of a seven-round, 32-team draft without compensatory selections. Anything numbered higher scores zero on both, and the reading names those picks. No value is estimated for them, so a trade whose balance hinges on very late picks is only partly scored.
Can I include next year's picks?
Not directly, because a future pick has no overall number until the draft order is set. Teams also discount future picks heavily: Massey and Thaler estimated the implied discount rate at about 174% a year. Entering a stand-in pick number from this year's draft would therefore overstate what a future pick fetches in a trade.
The Johnson chart says my trade is even. Why does the Stuart chart disagree?
Because the Johnson chart falls away much faster from the top. Take the default example: pick 10 for picks 22 and 54. On Johnson the second team returns 1,140 points for 1,300, or 87.69%, so the first team is overpaying. On Stuart the same picks score 24.1 for 19.9, a return of 121.11%, and the first team comes out ahead.
What is Approximate Value?
It is Pro-Football-Reference's attempt to put a single number on each player season since 1960 so that seasons can be roughly compared across years and positions. Stuart's chart converts the Approximate Value earned by players taken at each draft slot into a value for the slot itself, which is why it tracks production rather than price.

References& sources.

  1. [1]Massey, C. & Thaler, R. H. (2013). 'The Loser's Curse: Decision Making and Market Efficiency in the National Football League Draft.' Management Science 59(7), 1479–1495. Source for the existence and provenance of the trade value chart ('All NFL teams have a table (sometimes called "the chart") that lists the value of each draft pick. The first pick is given a value of 3000...'), for the observation that the chart has grown steeper over time (the tenth pick falling from 60% to 39% of the first), and for the estimated 174% annual discount rate on future picks. Publisher landing page blocks non-browser clients; the working-paper PDF is cited.
  2. [2]nflverse / nfldata — data/draft_values.csv. The machine-readable source of every pick value implemented on this page: column 'johnson' for the Jimmy Johnson trade chart and column 'stuart' for Chase Stuart's Approximate-Value chart, picks 1 to 262. Values were read programmatically from this file rather than transcribed. Spot values: pick 1 = 3000/34.6, pick 32 = 590/12.5, pick 224 = 2/0.1, pick 225 onward = 0 on both.
  3. [3]nflverse / nfldata — data/trades.csv. Source of the worked example: the 27 April 2023 trade in which Detroit sent picks 6 and 81 to Arizona for picks 12, 34 and 168, recorded as an all-picks, same-season, non-conditional deal.
  4. [4]Sports Reference LLC. Pro-Football-Reference glossary, entry for AV: 'approximate value. This is our attempt to put a single number on each player-season since 1960 so that we can (very approximately) compare across years and across positions.' The quantity Chase Stuart's chart is built from. Archived snapshot cited because the live page returns HTTP 403 to non-browser clients.

How this page was produced

Published by
Quanta Calculator
Primary sources
4 cited below
Method
V(team) = Σ chart[pick] · difference = V(A) − V(B) · return = V(B) ⁄ V(A) × 100
Published
Last verified

Built with AI assistance and verified by automated tests against the cited sources — every worked example on this page is computed by the same code that runs the calculator. How we build and check calculators.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 1560 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon