Audited ·Last updated 31 Jul 2026·3 citations·Tier 2·0 uses

RMS Voltage Calculator — Peak, Peak-to-Peak, Average and RMS

Convert peak, peak-to-peak, average and RMS voltage for sine, square, triangle and rectified waveforms, with crest factor, form factor and heating power.

RMS Voltage Calculator

Waveform shape
The value you have is
The number you measured, interpreted as whichever quantity you selected above. These are all magnitudes, so it must be greater than zero.
V
Used only for the heating-power output, which is what makes the RMS value concrete: V_rms²/R is exactly the power the same value of DC would deliver.
Ω
RMS voltage
120.2082
The effective value — the DC voltage that would heat the same resistor at the same rate. It is what a multimeter reports and what almost every AC specification means.
Peak voltage
170 V
Peak-to-peak voltage
340 V
Average voltage
108.2254 V
Crest factor
1.4142
Form factor
1.1107
Heating power into the load
144.5 W
Reading the result
For a sine wave, 170 V peak is 120.2082 V RMS, 340 V peak-to-peak and 108.2254 V average. The RMS figure is the one that means something physically: into 100 Ω it delivers 144.5 W, exactly as 120.2082 V of DC would. Peak-to-peak is twice the peak here, because the waveform swings symmetrically about zero. "Average" here is the mean of the waveform's absolute value over a full cycle, which is what an averaging meter reads. The true arithmetic mean of a full bipolar cycle is zero, which is why the absolute value is used. Its crest factor is 1.4142 — √2, the sine-wave value, which is the figure most meters and specifications silently assume. Its form factor is 1.1107. Anything above 1 means an averaging meter calibrated for a sine wave will misread this shape, because the RMS-to-average relationship is not the one it was scaled with. These are ideal, symmetric, DC-free shapes with no distortion, no duty-cycle other than 50 %, and no harmonics. Real waveforms deviate, and a true-RMS meter measures what is actually there rather than assuming a shape.

Background.

RMS voltage is the number that tells you what an AC waveform actually does. A 170 V peak sine wave is 120 V RMS, and the 120 V is the useful figure because it is exactly the DC voltage that would heat the same resistor at the same rate — 144.5 W into 100 Ω either way. That equivalence is the entire definition, and it is why mains supplies, amplifier ratings and multimeter readings are all quoted in RMS.

The conversion depends completely on the shape of the waveform, and this is where the arithmetic goes wrong. A sine wave's RMS is 0.707 of its peak. A square wave's RMS is its peak, exactly. A triangle or sawtooth is 0.577 of peak, and a half-wave rectified sine is 0.5. Feed a square wave into the sine-wave factor and you understate it by 29 %. This page therefore asks for the shape first and applies the right factor, in either direction: give it any one of peak, peak-to-peak, average or RMS, and it returns the other three.

Two details deserve attention because they cause most of the errors on this subject. First, peak-to-peak is not always twice the peak. It is for anything that swings symmetrically about zero, but a rectified waveform never goes below zero, so its peak-to-peak span equals its peak. Second, average does not mean the arithmetic mean. The arithmetic mean of a full sine cycle is zero. What is meant — and what an averaging meter responds to — is the mean of the absolute value, which for a sine wave is 0.637 of peak. Both are stated beside the result.

Alongside the four voltages the page reports the two shape numbers that matter in design. The crest factor, peak divided by RMS, tells you how much headroom the peaks need: 1 for a square wave, √2 for a sine, 2 for a half-wave rectified sine. Insulation, capacitor ratings and amplifier clipping are all set by the peak, so a high crest factor means the RMS reading is understating the stress. The form factor, RMS divided by average, is exactly 1 only for a square wave, and any other value is the reason an averaging multimeter calibrated for sine waves misreads a triangle or a chopped waveform.

Everything here assumes an ideal, symmetric, DC-free waveform with no distortion, no harmonics and a 50 % duty cycle where that applies. Real signals are not, and a true-RMS meter measures what is actually present rather than assuming a shape. The five shapes offered are the ones whose factors follow directly from the definitions and can be checked against a published source; nothing has been extrapolated to shapes that could not be.

What is rms voltage calculator?

The root-mean-square value of a waveform is the square root of the mean of its square over one period. That definition sounds abstract until you connect it to power: since power in a resistor goes as the square of voltage, the mean of the square is proportional to the mean power, and its square root is the DC voltage that would produce the same mean power. RMS is therefore the equivalent-heating voltage, and it is why AC quantities can be substituted directly into DC power formulas. Evaluating that integral over one cycle gives a fixed ratio to the peak for any given shape: 1/√2 for a sine, 1 for a square, 1/√3 for a triangle or sawtooth, 1/2 for a half-wave rectified sine, and 1/√2 again for a full-wave rectified sine. The average value, by contrast, is the mean of the absolute value, and it has a different ratio for each shape — 2/π for a sine, 1 for a square, 1/2 for a triangle. The two ratios are independent quantities, which is why the form factor between them varies from shape to shape, and why a meter that measures one and reports the other must know what shape it is looking at.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Pick the waveform shape. Every conversion factor on the page depends on it, and choosing the wrong one is the main source of error.
  2. Say which quantity your measurement is — peak, peak-to-peak, RMS or average. A scope cursor is usually peak or peak-to-peak; a multimeter is RMS.
  3. Enter the value, then a load resistance if you want the heating power.
  4. Read the RMS figure for anything to do with power, heating or specification, and the peak figure for anything to do with insulation, capacitor ratings or amplifier headroom.
  5. Check the peak-to-peak result on a rectified waveform: it equals the peak, not twice it.
  6. Use the crest factor to size headroom, and the form factor to judge whether an averaging meter can be trusted on this shape.

The formula.

V_rms = √( mean of v² ) V_avg = mean of |v| crest = V_peak ⁄ V_rms form = V_rms ⁄ V_avg P = V_rms² ⁄ R

Take the worked example: a sine wave with a 170 V peak, driving 100 Ω. The RMS value is 170 ÷ √2 = 120.2081528017 V. Squaring that and dividing by the resistance gives 144.5 W — and the same 144.5 W is what 120.2081528017 V of DC would deliver into the same resistor. That equality is not a coincidence or an approximation; it is what RMS is defined to produce.

The peak-to-peak span is 340 V, twice the peak, because a sine wave swings symmetrically about zero. The average is 2 × 170 ÷ π = 108.2253613025 V — the mean of the absolute value over a cycle, which is 0.637 of the peak, matching the figure the source text states. The arithmetic mean of that same waveform is exactly zero, which is why the absolute value is used and why the page says so beside the number.

The two shape factors follow. The crest factor is peak ÷ RMS = 170 ÷ 120.2081528017 = 1.4142135624, which is √2 — the value every sine-calibrated meter and every rule of thumb quietly assumes. The form factor is RMS ÷ average = 120.2081528017 ÷ 108.2253613025 = 1.1107207345, which the source rounds to 1.11.

Change the shape and every number moves except the peak. The same 170 V peak as a square wave is 170 V RMS — 289 W into the same load, exactly double the sine's power — with both factors equal to 1. As a triangle it is 98.1495457622 V RMS and 85 V average, with a crest factor of √3 and a form factor of 1.1547, which the source rounds to 1.15. As a half-wave rectified sine it is 85 V RMS, with a crest factor of 2, and its peak-to-peak span is 170 V rather than 340 V.

All of these come from evaluating the definitions rather than from a lookup table, because the conversion table in the source is published as an image that could not be read reliably. The mean of sin² over a period is ½, giving 1/√2; the mean of |sin| is 2/π; a triangle's mean square is ⅓ and its mean absolute value ½; a half-wave rectified sine keeps half of the sine's mean square, giving ¼ and hence ½ for the RMS ratio. Every one of the four decimal values the source does state in text — 0.707, 0.637, form factor 1.11 for a sine and 1.15 for a triangle, both factors 1 for a square — is reproduced by these derivations, and tests assert each of them.

Rounding happens once, at the return boundary, to ten decimal places. Both classification bands read the unrounded shape factors, and because those factors are properties of the waveform rather than of your measurement, they are identical whatever voltage you enter — a fact a test pins by doubling the input and checking that the factors do not move while the power quadruples.

What is not modelled: distortion, harmonics, DC offset, duty cycles other than 50 %, and any real waveform that is not one of these five shapes. For those, a true-RMS instrument is the answer, because it measures the waveform in front of it instead of assuming one.

A worked example.

Example

A 170 V peak sine wave — close to the amplitude of a North American mains supply — into a 100 Ω load. The RMS voltage is 170 ÷ √2 = 120.2081528017 V, the peak-to-peak span is 340 V, and the average of the absolute value is 108.2253613025 V. Into 100 Ω the waveform delivers 144.5 W, which is exactly what 120.2081528017 V of DC would deliver into the same resistor; that equivalence is the definition of RMS and the reason the figure is worth having. The crest factor is 1.4142135624, the √2 that every sine-calibrated instrument assumes, and the form factor is 1.1107207345, which the source text rounds to 1.11. As a published cross-check in the other direction, OpenStax states that a 110 V household outlet is an RMS value whose amplitude is 110√2 = 156 V; entering 110 V as an RMS sine here returns a peak of 155.563491861 V, which rounds to that. Change nothing but the shape and the answers move sharply: the same 170 V peak as a square wave is 170 V RMS and 289 W — double the power — while as a half-wave rectified sine it is 85 V RMS, 72.25 W, and its peak-to-peak span is 170 V rather than 340 V.

load Resistance100
voltage Value170
known Quantitypeak
waveformsine

Frequently asked questions.

Why is RMS voltage 0.707 of the peak?
Only for a sine wave, and it comes from the definition rather than from a convention. RMS is the square root of the mean of the square, and the mean of sin² over a full cycle is exactly one half — so the RMS value is the peak divided by √2, which is 0.7071. That factor belongs to the sine wave alone. A square wave's RMS equals its peak, a triangle's is 0.577 of peak, a half-wave rectified sine's is 0.5. Applying 0.707 to a non-sinusoidal waveform is the single most common error this page exists to prevent.
What is the difference between average and RMS voltage?
They answer different questions and are never interchangeable. The average, as used here and in the source text, is the mean of the waveform's absolute value over a cycle — 0.637 of peak for a sine wave — and it is what a rectifier-and-meter-movement instrument physically responds to. The RMS is the mean of the square, square-rooted, and it is the value that predicts heating. For a sine wave they differ by the form factor, 1.11. The arithmetic mean of a symmetric AC waveform, incidentally, is exactly zero, which is why the absolute value is taken first.
Is peak-to-peak always twice the peak?
No, and this catches people out on rectifier outputs. It is twice the peak for anything that swings symmetrically about zero — sine, square, triangle. But a half-wave or full-wave rectified sine never goes below zero, so its lowest point is 0 V and its peak-to-peak span equals its peak. A 170 V peak sine is 340 V peak-to-peak; the same signal after a bridge rectifier is 170 V peak-to-peak. This calculator applies the right factor for the shape you select and says so in the result.
What is crest factor and why does it matter?
Crest factor is the peak divided by the RMS: how tall the spikes are compared with the heating value. It is 1 for a square wave, √2 = 1.414 for a sine, √3 = 1.732 for a triangle and 2 for a half-wave rectified sine. It matters because two completely different things are set by two different numbers: heating, insulation ageing and power are set by the RMS, while insulation breakdown, capacitor voltage ratings, amplifier clipping and analogue-to-digital converter range are set by the peak. A waveform with a high crest factor can read comfortably on an RMS meter while breaking down insulation on every cycle.
Why does my cheap multimeter read a square wave wrongly?
Because it is not measuring RMS. An averaging meter rectifies the signal, measures the average, and multiplies by a constant chosen so the display is correct for a sine wave — that constant is the sine's form factor, 1.11. Feed it a square wave, whose form factor is 1.00, and the reading is about 11 % high; feed it a triangle, form factor 1.15, and it reads low. A true-RMS meter computes the actual mean square instead and is correct for any shape within its bandwidth and crest-factor specification. The form factor this page reports is exactly the number that quantifies the error.
Which waveforms can this calculator handle?
Five: sine, square at 50 % duty, triangle or sawtooth, half-wave rectified sine and full-wave rectified sine. Those are the shapes whose factors follow directly from the definitions and can be checked against a published source, and the page deliberately stops there rather than extrapolating to shapes it cannot verify. It also assumes ideal, symmetric, DC-free waveforms with no distortion or harmonics. For a pulse-width-modulated output, a chopped phase-angle waveform or anything with a DC offset, use a true-RMS instrument — it measures what is actually there rather than assuming a shape.

References& sources.

  1. [1]Tony R. Kuphaldt, 'Electric Circuits II — Alternating Current' (Lessons in Electric Circuits, Volume II), Workforce LibreTexts §1.3 'Measurements of AC Magnitude'. Primary source for the definitions and the published factor values. Peak is 'the height of an AC waveform as measured from the zero mark to the highest positive or lowest negative point on a graph'; peak-to-peak is 'the total height of an AC waveform as measured from maximum positive to maximum negative peaks on a graph'; RMS is 'a way of expressing an AC quantity of voltage or current in terms functionally equivalent to DC', being the value that would 'produce the same amount of heat dissipation across a resistor of given value', and is roughly 0.707 of peak for a sine wave, whose average is approximately 0.637 of peak. Crest factor is defined as peak divided by RMS and form factor as RMS divided by average, with the stated values: sine form factor 1.11, square wave both factors 1, triangle/sawtooth form factor 1.15. NOTE: the section's own conversion table is published as an image which could not be read, so the ratios implemented here are derived from the definitions and checked against these four stated decimal values, all of which they reproduce. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  2. [2]OpenStax (Rice University), University Physics Volume 2, §15.4 'Power in an AC Circuit'. Independent second authority for the sine-wave case and for the power relation. Equation 15.13 gives I_rms = I_0/√2 and V_rms = V_0/√2, and the average power in a resistor as P_ave = ½I_0V_0 = I_rms·V_rms = I_rms²R. The section also states that 'the 110 V from a household outlet is an rms value. The amplitude of this source is 110√2 V = 156 V', and that 'most ac meters are calibrated in terms of rms values'. Entering 110 V RMS on this page returns a peak of 155.563491861 V, which rounds to the source's 156 V — a test asserts it. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  3. [3]OpenStax (Rice University), University Physics Volume 2, §15.2 'Simple AC Circuits'. Consulted for the surrounding treatment that establishes the sinusoidal source convention v(t) = V_0 sin(ωt) used to evaluate the mean-square integral behind the 1/√2 factor, and for the definition of the amplitude V_0 as the peak value. Used to confirm that the peak in these relations is the amplitude about zero rather than a peak-to-peak span. Retrieved 2026-07-29.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 977 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon