Audited 31 Jul 2026·Last updated 28 Oct 2026·4 citations·Tier 2·0 uses

Voltage Regulation Calculator — Transformer, Load and Line Regulation

Percent voltage regulation from two measured voltages: transformer no-load vs full-load, or a supply's load and line regulation, with the %/V datasheet form.

Voltage Regulation Calculator

Which regulation figure
No-load voltage for a transformer, minimum-load voltage for load regulation, highest-line voltage for line regulation. Measure it with the same meter you use for the other reading.
V
Full-load voltage for a transformer, maximum-load voltage for load regulation, lowest-line voltage for line regulation. This is the denominator all three published definitions use.
V
Line regulation only. How far the input was moved between the two readings — a sweep from 3 V to 40 V is a span of 37 V. It converts the percentage into the %/V figure datasheets quote. Ignored in the other two modes.
V
Regulation
6.87
The change in output between the two conditions as a percentage of the heavy-condition voltage; 0 % is ideal, and a negative figure means the output rose under the heavier condition.
Voltage change
0.642 V
Denominator used
9.348 V
Same figure on the other base
6.43
Reading the result
Transformer / generator voltage regulation: the output moves 0.642 V between 9.99 V at no-load and 9.348 V at full-load. Against the full-load voltage — the denominator all three published definitions use — that is 6.8678 %. Measured against the no-load voltage instead it would read 6.4264 %, which is the same circuit and the wrong convention. Check which base a quoted figure used before comparing two supplies. The figure is positive, which is the normal direction: loading the supply, or dropping the line, pulls the output down. At or above the 3 % expected of a good power transformer on a resistive load, so this is loose regulation. An inductive load will make it worse still — the published benchmark is a best case measured resistively. This is arithmetic on two measured voltages: it says nothing about why the output moved, and nothing about behaviour between the two points, which is rarely a straight line. Measure both voltages at the same temperature and with the same meter, because a 0.1 % meter error on a 1 % regulation figure is a tenth of the answer.

Background.

Put a meter across a transformer's secondary with nothing connected and it reads 9.990 V. Connect the load it was built to drive and the reading falls to 9.348 V. The missing 0.642 V was lost inside the transformer, across the resistance of its windings and their leakage reactance, before it ever reached the terminals. Voltage regulation turns that loss into a percentage, and for this transformer it comes to 6.8678 % — more than twice the 3 % a good power transformer is expected to hold on a resistive load.

Quoted figures go astray on the division. Kuphaldt's transformer chapter and Fiore's equations for load and line regulation all divide by the lower, loaded voltage; divide the same 0.642 V by the no-load reading and the transformer seems to improve to 6.4264 % without anything about it having changed. A quoted figure often does not say which base it used, so both are shown here, with the denominator named.

Three different tests share the word. Transformer or generator regulation compares no load with full load while the primary voltage is held steady. Load regulation is the power-supply version: output at minimum load current against output at maximum, input fixed. Line regulation holds the load and moves the input instead, from the highest line voltage to the lowest, and regulator datasheets divide it by the input swing to quote %/V. The fraction is the same in all three. What you change on the bench between the readings is not, and a regulator can be excellent at one test and mediocre at another because different parts of its circuit set each figure.

What is voltage regulation calculator?

Voltage regulation is the change in a source's output voltage between two defined operating conditions, expressed as a percentage of the output at the more demanding one. For a transformer or generator the conditions are no load and rated load, so the figure measures internal impedance: winding resistance and leakage reactance sit in series with whatever is connected, and every amp drawn through them drops voltage the load never sees. For an electronic regulator it measures how well the feedback loop corrects for a change in load current (load regulation) or in input voltage (line regulation). In all three cases the ideal is 0 %.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Choose the definition that matches the test you ran. The two voltage fields relabel themselves: no-load and full-load for a transformer, minimum- and maximum-load current for load regulation, highest and lowest line for line regulation.
  2. Enter the light-condition reading. For a transformer, disconnect the load entirely; for a regulator, draw the smallest current it is specified for, since some need a minimum load to regulate at all.
  3. Enter the heavy-condition reading, which becomes the denominator. Take it with the same meter, at the output terminals rather than the far end of the load leads, so that cable drop and meter error are not counted as regulation.
  4. For line regulation only, enter how far you moved the input: a sweep from 3 V to 40 V of headroom is a span of 37 V. The field is ignored in the other two modes.
  5. Read the regulation, then check the denominator and the other-base figure before comparing it with a number someone else has quoted.

The formula.

Regulation % = ( V_light − V_heavy ) ⁄ V_heavy × 100 Line regulation (%/V) = Regulation % ⁄ ΔV_input

Regulation % = (V_light − V_heavy) ÷ V_heavy × 100. The subtraction is the voltage lost between the two conditions; dividing by V_heavy states that loss relative to what the load receives when it is working hardest, which is how Kuphaldt (§10.6) defines transformer regulation and how Fiore writes load and line regulation in his Equations 8.1 and 8.2.

The other-base figure divides the same spread by V_light. The two are linked exactly: alternative = r ÷ (1 + r/100), so the gap between them is r² ÷ (100 + r) percentage points. At 1 % regulation that gap is under a hundredth of a point; at 6.8678 % it is 0.44 of a point; on a supply that sags 20 % it reaches 3.33 points. The looser the source, the more the convention changes the number.

In line mode the percentage is also divided by the input span to give %/V, matching the LM317 datasheet's definition: percentage change in output per 1 V change at the input. In transformer mode the result is judged against Kuphaldt's benchmark of under 3 % on a resistive load; load and line regulation get no pass mark beyond the ideal of zero, since what counts as good depends on the part.

What drives a transformer's figure is its series impedance and the load's power factor. The standard approximation puts regulation near the resistive drop times cos φ plus the reactive drop times sin φ, at rated current. A lagging, inductive load adds the reactive term on top of the resistive one, which is why a transformer measured on a resistor bank regulates worse driving a motor. A leading, capacitive load makes sin φ negative and can lift the loaded voltage above the no-load voltage.

A worked example.

Example

Kuphaldt's worked transformer reads 9.990 V across its secondary at virtually no load and 9.348 V at the point chosen as full load. In transformer mode, 9.99 V goes in as the light reading and 9.348 V as the heavy one. The spread is 9.99 − 9.348 = 0.642 V. Dividing by the full-load voltage gives 0.642 ÷ 9.348 = 0.068678, and multiplying by 100 gives a regulation of 6.8678 %. On the no-load base the same spread is 0.642 ÷ 9.99 × 100 = 6.4264 %, a gap of 0.44 of a point — more than four times the LM317's typical load-regulation figure of 0.1 %. Against the 3 % benchmark this transformer is loose, and the verdict says so, adding that an inductive load would make it worse. A line-regulation test is read through %/V instead. Suppose a regulator set to 12 V gives 12.050 V at the top of a 37 V input sweep and 12.000 V at the bottom. That is 0.05 ÷ 12 × 100 = 0.4167 % overall, and dividing by the 37 V span gives 0.011261 %/V: a fraction above the LM317's 0.01 %/V typical and comfortably inside its 0.04 %/V maximum.

input Voltage Span37
regulation Typetransformer
lower Voltage9.348
upper Voltage9.99

Frequently asked questions.

What regulation should a good power transformer achieve?
Under 3 % on a simple resistive load, according to Kuphaldt's treatment that this calculator follows. That is a best case: an inductive load raises the figure. Small transformers usually do worse than large ones, because their windings carry proportionally more resistance, so a little PCB transformer can read well above its label with nothing connected.
Why is the full-load voltage on the bottom of the fraction?
Because the cited definitions put it there. Kuphaldt divides by the full-load voltage for transformers, and Fiore's load and line equations divide by the lower of the two readings. Expressing the loss relative to what the load receives at its worst is also the convention in most power-engineering texts. Regulator datasheets sometimes quote load regulation as a percentage of the nominal output instead, which for small figures lands almost on the same number.
Can voltage regulation come out negative?
Yes, for real reasons and for careless ones. A transformer feeding a leading, capacitive load can deliver more voltage loaded than unloaded, and a regulator with over-compensated remote sensing can rise slightly as current increases. Far more often, though, the two readings have simply been entered in each other's fields, which the verdict points out.
How do I measure load regulation on a regulator or bench supply?
Hold the input voltage fixed, set the load to the smallest current the part is specified for, read the output, then step to the maximum current and read again. Measure at the output pins with separate sense leads if you can, and take the second reading promptly, because cable resistance and self-heating would otherwise be counted as regulation. The LM317 figure, for example, covers 10 mA to 1,500 mA.
Why do datasheets quote line regulation in %/V?
So that parts tested over different input ranges can be compared. A 0.4 % change across a 37 V sweep is a much better result than 0.4 % across a 5 V sweep, and dividing by the span shows it: 0.0108 %/V against 0.08 %/V. The LM317's 0.01 %/V typical figure was measured across 3 V to 40 V of input-to-output headroom.
Is regulation the same thing as voltage drop in a cable?
No. Cable voltage drop is predicted from the conductor's resistance, the current and the length of the run, before anything is installed. Regulation is measured at the terminals of the source and describes its own internal impedance. In an installation the two stack: the load sees the source's sag plus the cable's drop, so sizing a cable calls for a voltage-drop calculation instead.
Does the result tell me what the output will be at half load?
Not reliably. Two readings fix two points and say nothing about the path between them. A transformer's droop is roughly proportional to load current, so halfway is a fair guess there, but a switching regulator need not behave linearly and a supply that reaches current limit collapses abruptly.

References& sources.

  1. [1]Tony R. Kuphaldt, 'Electric Circuits II — Alternating Current' (Lessons in Electric Circuits, Volume II), Workforce LibreTexts, §10.6 'Voltage Regulation'. Primary source for the transformer definition and the quality benchmark. States: 'The measure of how well a power transformer maintains constant secondary voltage over a range of load currents is called the transformer's voltage regulation'; that its worked secondary 'spans a range of 9.990 volts at (virtually) no load and 9.348 volts at the point we decided to call full load'; and that 'a good power transformer should exhibit a regulation percentage of less than 3%' on a simple resistive load, with inductive loads producing worse regulation. NOTE: the section's own arithmetic is rendered as an image which could not be read reliably, so this page does not quote the source's printed percentage — it applies the stated formula to the source's stated voltages and obtains 6.8677792041 %. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  2. [2]James M. Fiore, 'Operational Amplifiers and Linear Integrated Circuits: Theory and Application', Engineering LibreTexts §8.2 'The Need for Regulation'. Primary source for the two power-supply definitions. Equation 8.1: 'Line Regulation = (V_max − V_min)/V_min × 100', where 'V_max is the load voltage produced at the maximum AC line potential and V_min is the load voltage for the lowest AC line potential', and 'the perfect line regulation figure would be 0%'. Equation 8.2: 'Load Regulation = (V_max − V_min)/V_min × 100', where 'V_max is the largest load voltage produced, and V_min is the minimum load voltage produced. These points usually occur at the minimum and maximum load currents, respectively', and it 'would ideally be 0%'. Independent of the Kuphaldt source and agreeing with it on the denominator. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  3. [3]Texas Instruments, 'LM317 3-Pin Adjustable Regulator' datasheet, SLVS044Z, September 1997, revised April 2025. Source of the %/V form of line regulation and of the benchmark figures quoted on this page. Features list: 'Line regulation: 0.01%/V (typ)' and 'Load regulation: 0.1% (typ)'. Electrical Characteristics: line regulation 0.01 typical, 0.04 maximum, unit %/V, at TJ = 25 °C over 3 V ≤ (VIN − VOUT) ≤ 40 V; load regulation for VO ≥ 5 V, 0.1 typical and 0.5 maximum, unit %VO, over IO = 10 mA to 1500 mA. Footnote (2) defines the measure: 'line regulation is expressed as the percentage change in output voltage per 1V change at the input'. PDF datasheet; text extracted locally because the fetch tool could not read it. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  4. [4]James M. Fiore, 'Operational Amplifiers and Linear Integrated Circuits: Theory and Application', Engineering LibreTexts, Chapter 8 'Voltage Regulation' (chapter landing page listing §8.1–8.3). Consulted for the surrounding treatment of linear regulators that gives the two equations their context — in particular that the two figures characterise different parts of a supply and are measured with different quantities held constant. Retrieved 2026-07-29.

How this page was produced

Published by
Quanta Calculator
Primary sources
4 cited below
Method
Regulation % = ( V_light − V_heavy ) ⁄ V_heavy × 100 Line regulation (%/V) = Regulation % ⁄ ΔV_input
Published
Last verified

Built with AI assistance and verified by automated tests against the cited sources — every worked example on this page is computed by the same code that runs the calculator. How we build and check calculators.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 1560 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon