Audited ·Last updated 29 Jul 2026·5 citations·Tier 2·0 uses

Surface Gravity of a Planet Calculator

Compute a planet's surface gravity from its mass and radius, separate out the equatorial rotation term, and solve back for the mass or radius.

Surface Gravity of a Planet Calculator

Solve for
Default is Earth, 5.97217 × 10²⁴ kg (JPL). Leave as-is when solving for the mass.
kg
Default is Earth's equatorial radius, 6 378.1366 km (JPL). Use the volumetric mean radius instead if you want to reproduce a published bulk density.
m
Only used when solving for the mass or the radius. This is the NON-ROTATING value GM/R², the quantity agency tables publish.
m/s²
Enter 0 to ignore rotation entirely. Retrograde rotators may be entered negative — only the magnitude is used, because the centrifugal term depends on ω².
h
Newtonian surface gravity (GM/R²)
9.7983
Gravitational field at the surface excluding rotation. This is the quantity JPL and other agency tables publish as 'equatorial gravity'.
Centrifugal reduction at the equator (ω²R)
0.0339 m/s²
Effective surface gravity at the equator
9.7644 m/s²
Relative to Earth gravity
0.9957 g
Mass
5,972,170,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg
Radius
6,378,136.6 m
Bulk density
5.4949 g/cm³
Regime and limits
Spherically symmetric point-mass field plus a rigid-body centrifugal term at the equator. 'Newtonian gravity' is GM/R² and excludes rotation — that is the quantity agency tables such as JPL's normally publish. 'Effective surface gravity' subtracts the equatorial centrifugal term and is closer to what a scale would read. Oblateness is NOT modelled: fed WGS 84's defining parameters this model returns 9.76437 m/s² for Earth's equator against the standard's normal gravity of 9.78033 m/s², 0.163 % low, and that residual is the equatorial bulge. For a gas giant there is no solid surface: an agency 'radius' for Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus or Neptune is the 1-bar pressure level, a chosen reference rather than ground. The bulk density is the spherical-equivalent value for the radius you entered — to reproduce a published bulk density for a flattened planet, enter its volumetric mean radius rather than its equatorial one.

Background.

Surface gravity follows from just two numbers: how much mass a body has, and how far its surface sits from the centre. Newton's law gives g₀ = GM/R², and that single expression governs everything from the 0.0006 m/s² of a small asteroid to the 24.79 m/s² at Jupiter's cloud tops. This calculator takes a mass and a radius for any body — a planet, a moon, an asteroid, an exoplanet, or something hypothetical — and returns the field strength, its bulk density, and the amount its own rotation cancels. It also inverts, so you can ask what mass a body of a given size would need to reach a target gravity, or how large a body of a given mass would have to be.

The rotation term is the reason this page reports two gravities rather than one, and the distinction trips up more people than any other part of the subject. JPL's planetary tables carry a column headed 'Equatorial Gravity', and for Earth it reads 9.80 m/s². Compute GM/R² with Earth's equatorial radius and you get 9.7983 — so that published column excludes rotation entirely. What a scale at the equator actually responds to is smaller, because the ground beneath it is moving in a circle and part of the gravitational field is spent supplying the centripetal acceleration. Subtract ω²R = 0.0339 m/s² and you get 9.7644 m/s². Both numbers are correct answers to different questions, and this page shows the field, the correction and the result side by side so it is never ambiguous which is on screen.

For Earth the correction is a third of a percent and easy to ignore. For Jupiter it is not. Jupiter turns once every 9.925 hours, and at its equator ω²R comes to 2.21 m/s² — 8.9 % of the 24.79 m/s² gravitational field, leaving an effective 22.58 m/s². Push the spin further and the two terms meet: when ω²R equals GM/R² the effective gravity is zero and loose material at the equator is no longer bound. That is rotational break-up, and the calculator reports it rather than hiding a negative number. Earth would reach it at a rotation period of 1.408 hours.

The model has an honest limit that belongs here rather than in a footnote: it treats the body as a sphere. Real rotating planets bulge at the equator, and that bulge redistributes mass in a way a point-mass field cannot represent. Fed the WGS 84 standard's own defining parameters for Earth — GM = 3.986004418 × 10¹⁴ m³/s², a = 6 378 137.0 m, ω = 7.292115 × 10⁻⁵ rad/s — this calculator returns 9.76437 m/s² at the equator against the standard's normal equatorial gravity of 9.78033 m/s². The 0.163 % shortfall is precisely the oblateness term. So treat results for a fast rotator as good to a few parts in a thousand, not to the last displayed digit.

One more scope note. For the giant planets there is no solid surface to stand on. An agency 'radius' for Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus or Neptune is the level where the atmospheric pressure reaches one bar — a chosen reference, not ground — so 'surface gravity' for those worlds means 'gravity at the 1-bar level' and nothing more.

If what you actually want is your own weight on each planet rather than the physics of an arbitrary body, the Weight on Other Planets calculator does that from a single input and published gravity values, with no mass or radius to look up.

What is surface gravity of a planet calculator?

Surface gravity is the gravitational acceleration a body produces at its own surface, in metres per second squared. For a spherically symmetric mass it is g = GM/R², where G is the gravitational constant, M the mass and R the radius. The result does not depend on the mass of whatever is being attracted, which is why a feather and an anvil fall at the same rate in a vacuum.

Because g goes as M/R², density matters as much as size. Mars has about a tenth of Earth's mass but only half the radius, so its surface gravity is 3.71 m/s² — 38 % of Earth's rather than 10 %. Mercury, despite being much smaller than Mars, has almost identical surface gravity at 3.70 m/s², because it is far denser.

On a rotating body the quantity a scale measures is not g itself. Part of the gravitational field goes into holding the object on a circular path with the rotating ground, so the apparent weight is reduced by ω²R at the equator and by nothing at all at the poles. Geodesists call the field GM/R² and the measured quantity 'normal gravity' or 'surface acceleration', and the difference is why the same object weighs slightly more in Oslo than in Nairobi.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Choose whether you want the surface gravity, or want to solve back for the mass or the radius.
  2. Enter the mass in kilograms and the radius in metres. Earth's values are pre-filled from JPL.
  3. Enter the sidereal rotation period in hours, or 0 to ignore rotation. A retrograde period may be entered negative — only its magnitude is used.
  4. Read the Newtonian gravity if you want the value comparable with agency tables, and the effective gravity if you want what a scale at the equator would respond to.
  5. Check the bulk density against a published value as a sanity check; to reproduce a tabulated density for a flattened planet, enter its volumetric mean radius rather than its equatorial one.
  6. Read the regime note: it flags a rotation correction above 5 %, and flags rotational break-up when the effective gravity reaches zero.

The formula.

g₀ = G·M ⁄ R², a_cen = ω²·R, g_eff = g₀ − ω²R, ω = 2π ⁄ |P|, ρ = 3M ⁄ (4πR³)

The gravitational field of a spherically symmetric body at its surface is g₀ = GM/R², a result Newton proved in the Principia by showing that a spherical shell attracts an external point exactly as if all its mass sat at the centre. The calculator evaluates that with G = 6.67430 × 10⁻¹¹ m³ kg⁻¹ s⁻² from CODATA 2022.

The rotation term comes from the rotating frame. A point at the equator of a body turning with angular velocity ω = 2π/P travels a circle of radius R, so it needs a centripetal acceleration ω²R, and that comes out of the gravitational field. The apparent gravity is therefore g₀ − ω²R at the equator, falling to g₀ at the poles where the circle has zero radius. Only ω² enters, so the sign of the rotation period is irrelevant — a retrograde rotator such as Venus, which agencies tabulate as −243.018 days, gives the same answer as +243.018 days.

All three solve modes operate on the non-rotating relation. Solving for the mass gives M = g₀R²/G; solving for the radius gives R = √(GM/g₀). Inverting the rotating relation instead would mean rooting the cubic ω²R³ + gR² − GM = 0, whose answer depends on which root you meant, so the calculator keeps the inverse unambiguous and reports the rotation correction at the geometry it lands on.

ROUNDING STAGE. Nothing is rounded part-way through. All arithmetic runs at 40 significant digits in a dedicated high-precision decimal context; rounding happens once, at the return boundary — 10 decimal places for accelerations, ratios and densities, and 12 significant digits for the mass and radius, which span many orders of magnitude.

SIGNIFICANT FIGURES. Two limits apply. First, a mass in kilograms inherits the 22-parts-per-million uncertainty of G, so absolute gravities are capped near five significant figures however precise your inputs look. Second, and far larger, the point-mass model itself is only good to a few parts in a thousand for a flattened body — see the WGS 84 comparison above. Do not quote the tenth decimal place of an answer as though it meant anything.

SIGN CONVENTION AND INVALID DOMAIN. Gravity and the centrifugal term are reported as positive magnitudes; the effective gravity is their difference and may legitimately be negative, which means rotational break-up. Mass, radius and target gravity must all be strictly positive: at R = 0 both GM/R² and the density are singular, and at g₀ = 0 the radius R = √(GM/g₀) is infinite. Those raise a labelled error against the offending field. A rotation period of 0 is read as 'ignore rotation' rather than as an infinite spin.

A worked example.

Example

Take Earth as JPL tabulates it: mass 5.97217 × 10²⁴ kg, equatorial radius 6 378 136.6 m, sidereal rotation period 23.9344696 hours. The gravitational field at that radius is g₀ = GM/R² = 6.67430 × 10⁻¹¹ × 5.97217 × 10²⁴ ⁄ (6 378 136.6)² = 9.7982891789 m/s². JPL's own 'Equatorial Gravity' column reads 9.80 — agreement to all three figures it publishes, which also confirms that the published column excludes rotation. Now the spin. The rotation period in seconds is 86 164.09 s, so ω = 2π ⁄ 86 164.09 = 7.29211585 × 10⁻⁵ rad/s, and the centrifugal reduction at the equator is ω²R = 0.0339157118 m/s². Subtracting gives an effective equatorial gravity of 9.7643734671 m/s², which is 0.9956889934 of the conventional standard gravity gₙ = 9.80665 m/s². Rotation therefore costs the equator 0.346 % of its weight. The bulk density comes out at 5.4949292308 g/cm³ using the equatorial radius. That is deliberately not JPL's tabulated 5.5134 g/cm³, because JPL computes bulk density from the volumetric mean radius of 6 371.0084 km. Re-enter that radius and the calculator returns 5.5134 g/cm³ exactly — which is a clean check that the density formula and JPL's agree once they are given the same radius. Finally the honest limit. Feed in the WGS 84 standard's own defining parameters instead — GM = 3.986004418 × 10¹⁴ m³/s², a = 6 378 137.0 m, ω = 7.292115 × 10⁻⁵ rad/s — and this model returns 9.7643697732 m/s². WGS 84's normal gravity at the equator is 9.7803253359 m/s². The 0.163 % gap is Earth's equatorial bulge, which a sphere cannot reproduce, and it is the honest accuracy ceiling of this page for any rotating, flattened body.

rotation Period Hours23.934
surface Gravity Mps29.8
radius M6,378,136.6
mass Kg5,972,170,000,000,000,000,000,000
solve Forgravity

Frequently asked questions.

Why does JPL say Earth's gravity is 9.80 while my physics textbook says 9.81?
They are different quantities. JPL's 9.80 m/s² is GM/R² at the equatorial radius — the gravitational field, with no rotation subtracted. The 9.81 you usually meet is close to the conventional standard gravity gₙ = 9.80665 m/s², a value fixed by definition at the 3rd General Conference on Weights and Measures in 1901 for use in defining weight, not a measurement of anywhere in particular. Real measured gravity ranges from about 9.78 m/s² at the equator to about 9.83 m/s² at the poles.
How much does Earth's rotation reduce my weight?
At the equator, by 0.0339 m/s² out of 9.7983 — about 0.35 %, or roughly 250 grams off a 70-kilogram person. At the poles it is zero, because a point on the rotation axis traces no circle. This is one of two reasons weight varies with latitude; the other, and slightly larger, is that the equator sits about 21 km further from Earth's centre than the poles do.
What is rotational break-up and when does this calculator report it?
When the centrifugal term ω²R grows to equal the gravitational field GM/R², the effective gravity at the equator reaches zero and loose material there is no longer bound to the body. Spin any faster and the effective gravity goes negative. The calculator reports the number rather than hiding it, and flags the condition explicitly. Earth would reach break-up at a rotation period of 1.408 hours. In reality a body would deform badly and probably disintegrate well before that point, so the figure is a limit rather than a description.
Can I use this for a gas giant, and what does 'surface' even mean there?
You can, but read the number carefully. Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune have no solid surface, so the radius agencies publish is the level at which the atmospheric pressure reaches one bar. 'Surface gravity' for those planets therefore means 'gravity at the 1-bar level' and nothing else. Jupiter's value is 24.79 m/s² by that convention, and its rotation removes a further 2.21 m/s² at the equator — 8.9 %, which is far too large to leave out.
Why does my bulk density not match the published value?
Almost always because of which radius you used. Agencies compute bulk density from the volumetric mean radius — the radius of a sphere with the same volume as the real, flattened planet — while surface gravity is usually quoted at the equatorial radius. Earth's equatorial radius gives 5.4949 g/cm³ and its volumetric mean radius gives 5.5134 g/cm³, which is JPL's published figure. Enter whichever radius matches the quantity you are trying to reproduce.
How accurate is this model?
For a slow rotator that is close to spherical, very good — limited mainly by the 22-parts-per-million uncertainty in G. For a fast rotator it is limited by the model itself, which treats the body as a sphere and cannot represent the equatorial bulge. Fed WGS 84's own defining parameters for Earth it lands 0.163 % below the standard's normal equatorial gravity, and that gap is entirely the oblateness term. Treat a few parts in a thousand as the realistic ceiling for any flattened planet.
Should I use this or the Weight on Other Planets calculator?
Use this one when you have a mass and a radius and want the physics — including an exoplanet, a moon, an asteroid, or a body you invented. Use Weight on Other Planets when you simply want to know what you would weigh on each solar-system body: it takes a single weight, needs no physical parameters at all, and uses published gravity values for ten bodies at once.

References& sources.

  1. [1]NASA JPL Solar System Dynamics, 'Planetary Physical Parameters': column headers 'Equatorial Radius (km)', 'Mean Radius (km)', 'Mass (×10²⁴ kg)', 'Bulk Density (g cm⁻³)', 'Sidereal Rotation Period (d)' and 'Equatorial Gravity (m s⁻²)'. Earth: 6378.1366 km, 6371.0084 km, 5.97217, 5.5134, 0.99726968 d, 9.80 m/s². Jupiter: 71 492 km, 1898.125, 0.41354 d, 24.79 m/s². The gravity column is noted as 'derived from other referenced values and uncertainties in this table'. Independent, open access. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  2. [2]NIST, CODATA 2022 recommended value of the Newtonian constant of gravitation: G = 6.674 30(15) × 10⁻¹¹ m³ kg⁻¹ s⁻², relative standard uncertainty 2.2 × 10⁻⁵. Independent, open access. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  3. [3]BIPM, 3rd CGPM (1901) Resolution 2, 'Declaration on the unit of mass and on the definition of weight; conventional value of gₙ': adopts 980.665 cm/s² as the conventional standard acceleration due to gravity, and defines weight as a force equal to mass times that acceleration. Independent, open access. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  4. [4]NGA Office of Geomatics, World Geodetic System 1984, standard NGA.STND.0036_1.0.0_WGS84 (revision of 8 July 2014). DEFINING parameters verified on the NGA WGS 84 page and used directly in the worked example: semi-major axis a = 6 378 137.0 m, flattening 1/f = 298.257223563, angular velocity ω = 7 292 115 × 10⁻¹¹ rad/s, geocentric gravitational constant GM = 3.986 004 418 × 10¹⁴ m³/s². The normal equatorial gravity of 9.780 325 3359 m/s² quoted alongside it is a DERIVED constant from the same standard; that derived table was not machine-readable at retrieval, so treat it as a standards-document reference rather than a fetched figure. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  5. [5]Newton, I. (1687). Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Book I, Propositions LXXI and LXXIII — the shell theorem, which is what licenses treating a spherically symmetric planet as a point mass at its centre. Print/bibliographic reference.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 682 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon