Audited 31 Jul 2026·Last updated 28 Oct 2026·5 citations·Tier 1·0 uses

Fuel Economy Converter

Convert fuel economy between US mpg, UK Imperial mpg, litres per 100 km and km per litre, using the exact legal sizes of the mile and both gallons.

Fuel Economy Converter

Input unit
US fuel economy
30
Miles travelled per US gallon of 3.785411784 litres, the unit on US window stickers; higher means less fuel, and 100 divided by it gives gallons per 100 miles.
Imperial fuel economy
36.0285 mpg (Imp)
Metric fuel consumption
7.8405 L/100 km
Metric fuel economy
12.7543 km/L

Background.

A British road test that praises a car for returning 50 mpg and an American window sticker reading about 41.6 mpg can be describing exactly the same fuel use. Neither is wrong. The UK quotes miles per Imperial gallon of 4.54609 litres, the United States quotes miles per US gallon of 3.785411784 litres, and the bigger British gallon carries a car about 20% further. Across most of Europe, Canada and Australia the same car would be listed at about 5.65 litres per 100 kilometres; in Japan or India it would more likely be quoted in kilometres per litre.

Those four units fall into two families that run in opposite directions. Miles per gallon and kilometres per litre measure distance per unit of fuel, so a bigger number is better. Litres per 100 km measures fuel per unit of distance, so a smaller number is better, and converting between the families means taking a reciprocal rather than multiplying by a factor. Enter a figure in any of the four units and the other three appear, each derived from the exact legal definitions of the mile and the two gallons.

The direction matters for more than labelling. Fuel bought tracks consumption, not economy, so equal steps in mpg are not equal savings. Moving from 20 to 30 US mpg saves 1.67 gallons every 100 miles; moving from 30 to 40 saves 0.83, and from 40 to 50 only 0.5, although each step looks the same on paper. The US Environmental Protection Agency prints gallons per 100 miles on its fuel economy label for that reason, and anyone deciding whether a more economical car is worth paying for will find the consumption figure the clearer guide.

What is fuel economy converter?

Fuel economy is distance travelled per unit of fuel; fuel consumption is its reciprocal, fuel used per unit of distance. US mpg counts statute miles per US liquid gallon, exactly 3.785411784 litres. Imperial mpg counts miles per Imperial gallon, fixed in UK law by the Weights and Measures Act 1985 at exactly 4.54609 litres. The two gallons parted company long ago: the American one descends from the old English wine gallon of 231 cubic inches, while Britain replaced its assortment of gallons in 1824 with the Imperial gallon, originally the volume of ten pounds of water. The mile itself is exactly 1.609344 kilometres in both countries. Kilometres per litre is the metric economy unit, and litres per 100 kilometres the metric consumption unit used on European, Canadian and Australian vehicle labels. Because every definition involved is exact, conversion between these units adds no uncertainty: whatever uncertainty there is lives in the original measurement. The US has a consumption unit of its own, gallons per 100 miles, which is simply 100 ÷ mpg and appears on EPA labels beside the mpg rating. All four units handled here describe liquid fuel by volume, so they say nothing about the energy in that fuel or the cost of buying it.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Work out which unit your figure is in. An mpg figure from a UK source is almost always Imperial; one from a US source is US. Labels in Europe, Canada and Australia give L/100 km.
  2. Enter the value and select its unit. Any positive number is accepted. A trip-computer reading converts like any other figure, but it is the car's own estimate rather than a measured fill-up.
  3. Read the other three units. The US mpg figure is shown first, alongside Imperial mpg, L/100 km and km/L. One decimal place is plenty for comparing cars; the extra digits only matter when you convert a figure back.
  4. To compare running costs, use L/100 km: multiplying it by the price of a litre gives the fuel cost of every 100 km, and the difference between two cars is a direct difference in fuel bought.
  5. When combining several trips or tanks, add up total distance and total fuel rather than averaging the mpg figures, then convert the result.

The formula.

km/L = US MPG × 1.609344 / 3.785411784; L/100 km = 100 / (km/L)

Every input is first turned into kilometres per litre, and the other units are calculated from that. From US mpg: km/L = mpg × 1.609344 ÷ 3.785411784, which works out to about 0.4251 km/L per mpg. From Imperial mpg the divisor is 4.54609 instead, about 0.3540 km/L per mpg. From L/100 km: km/L = 100 ÷ (L/100 km). Converting back uses the same constants the other way round, and L/100 km is always 100 divided by km/L.

Two shortcuts follow from those constants. Litres per 100 km equals 235.2146 divided by US mpg, or 282.4809 divided by Imperial mpg, so 30 US mpg is 235.2146 ÷ 30 = 7.8405 L/100 km. Between the two economy units the factors are fixed: 1 km/L equals 2.3521 US mpg or 2.8248 Imperial mpg. And Imperial mpg is US mpg multiplied by 4.54609 ÷ 3.785411784, about 1.2009, because the distance stays the same while the gallon grows by just over 20%.

The reciprocal is the part with consequences. Since L/100 km = 235.2146 ÷ US mpg, the fuel saved by a better figure shrinks as the figure rises: 20 mpg is 11.7607 L/100 km, 30 mpg is 7.8405 and 40 mpg is 5.8804. The first ten-mpg step saves about 3.92 litres every 100 km, the second only 1.96. In gallons per 100 miles, which is simply 100 ÷ mpg, 10 mpg uses 10 gallons, 20 uses 5, 30 uses 3.33 and 50 uses 2. Percentage claims shrink the same way: a car with 20% better mpg uses 1 − 1 ÷ 1.2 = 16.7% less fuel over the same distance, and a 10% improvement saves 9.1%.

Nothing here models how the original figure was measured. A test-cycle rating, a trip-computer reading and a tank-to-tank calculation convert identically, but they remain different measurements. Real consumption also moves with speed, cold starts, stop-start traffic, load, tyre pressure and air-conditioning, and none of that belongs in a change of units.

A worked example.

Example

Suppose a car is rated at 30 miles per US gallon and you want the figure in the units used on a European or Canadian label. First turn the miles into kilometres: 30 × 1.609344 = 48.2803 km on one US gallon. A US gallon holds 3.785411784 litres, so 48.2803 ÷ 3.785411784 = 12.7543 km/L. Consumption is the reciprocal scaled to 100 km: 100 ÷ 12.7543 = 7.8405 L/100 km. For a British comparison, carry the km/L figure through the larger gallon: 12.7543 × 4.54609 = 57.982 km per Imperial gallon, and 57.982 ÷ 1.609344 = 36.0285 mpg (Imp). The car is unchanged; only the gallon is bigger. A car rated at 40 US mpg comes to 5.8804 L/100 km by the same steps. Over a 1,000 km journey the 30 mpg car burns about 78.4 litres and the 40 mpg car about 58.8, a difference of 19.6 litres, and that is the figure to weigh against any difference in purchase price.

input UnitusMpg
value30

Frequently asked questions.

Why does the same car have a higher mpg figure in Britain than in the US?
Because the British figure is measured in bigger gallons. An Imperial gallon is 4.54609 litres and a US gallon 3.785411784 litres, so the Imperial gallon is about 1.2009 times larger and a car covers that many times more miles on it. 30 US mpg is 36.0285 Imperial mpg, and 50 Imperial mpg is only 41.63 US mpg.
What is the quickest way to turn L/100 km into mpg?
Divide 235.2146 by the L/100 km figure for US mpg, or 282.4809 for Imperial mpg. The same division works in reverse, because the relationship is a reciprocal. So 5 L/100 km is 235.2146 ÷ 5 = 47.04 US mpg or 56.50 Imperial mpg, and 30 US mpg is 7.8405 L/100 km. For km/L to mpg there is no division at all: multiply by 2.3521 for US or 2.8248 for Imperial.
Why is a lower L/100 km figure better when a higher mpg is better?
They measure opposite things. Mpg and km/L count how far a unit of fuel takes you, so more is better. L/100 km counts how much fuel a fixed distance takes, so less is better. Halving L/100 km is the same as doubling mpg: 11.76 L/100 km and 5.88 L/100 km correspond to 20 and 40 US mpg.
Does improving from 20 to 30 mpg save as much as improving from 30 to 40?
No, roughly twice as much. Per 100 miles, a 20 mpg car uses 5 gallons, a 30 mpg car 3.33 and a 40 mpg car 2.5, so the first step saves 1.67 gallons and the second 0.83. For two cars driven the same distance, replacing the thirstier one usually saves more fuel than upgrading the economical one, which mpg figures alone tend to hide.
How do I average fuel economy over several trips?
Divide total distance by total fuel instead of averaging the mpg figures. Drive 100 miles at 20 mpg and 100 miles at 40 mpg and you use 5 + 2.5 = 7.5 gallons for 200 miles, which is 26.67 mpg, not the 30 a simple average suggests. Consumption figures such as L/100 km can be averaged directly when the distances are equal; when they differ, weight each figure by the distance it covered.
Can I use the converter for diesel, LPG or ethanol blends?
Yes, for the units themselves, because the conversion only concerns distance and volume. Be careful comparing across fuels, though: a litre of diesel holds more energy than a litre of petrol, and a litre of LPG or a high-ethanol blend holds less, so equal L/100 km figures do not mean equal energy use or equal cost. To compare running costs across fuels, multiply each L/100 km figure by the price per litre of its own fuel.
Can I convert MPGe or kWh per 100 miles here?
No. MPGe is an energy-equivalence rating: the EPA treats 33.7 kilowatt-hours of electricity as equivalent to one gallon of gasoline, so it is not a measure of liquid fuel by volume. Running it through a volume conversion would produce a number with no physical meaning. Electric efficiency is better compared in kWh per 100 km or per 100 miles, the electrical counterpart of L/100 km, using the figures the rating body publishes.
Why doesn't a converted European rating match the US label for the same model?
Because the two figures come from different test procedures, not just different units. European and UK figures come from the WLTP laboratory cycle, US labels from the EPA's own tests, and the driving patterns, temperatures and adjustments differ. Converting a WLTP figure to US mpg changes its unit but leaves it a WLTP result, so expect a gap between the two.
Which countries use which fuel economy unit?
The United States uses miles per US gallon. The United Kingdom quotes miles per Imperial gallon, even though fuel is sold by the litre. The European Union, Canada and Australia use litres per 100 km on official labels, and kilometres per litre is common in Japan and India. When a source does not say which gallon it means, its country usually tells you.
How do I measure my own car's fuel consumption?
Fill the tank until the pump clicks off, reset the trip meter, drive normally, then refill at the same pump in the same way. Divide the distance by the litres or gallons added, and convert to whatever unit you prefer. A single tank is easily skewed by how the pump shuts off, so average several fill-ups by total distance over total fuel. Keep the unit written beside every figure in your log, since a bare "32" could later be read as either kind of mpg.

How this page was produced

Published by
Quanta Calculator
Primary sources
5 cited below
Method
km/L = US MPG × 1.609344 / 3.785411784; L/100 km = 100 / (km/L)
Published
Last verified

Built with AI assistance and verified by automated tests against the cited sources — every worked example on this page is computed by the same code that runs the calculator. How we build and check calculators.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 1560 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon