Audited ·Last updated 31 Jul 2026·4 citations·Tier 2·0 uses

3 Phase Motor Amperage Calculator — Line Current from Horsepower, and Motor Load from a Measured Current

Line current of a three-phase motor from its horsepower, voltage, efficiency and power factor — and the inverse, motor load percent from a measured current.

3 Phase Motor Amperage Calculator

What do you want to work out?
The SHAFT OUTPUT on the nameplate, never the electrical input. A '25 hp' motor delivers 25 hp at the shaft and draws more than that from the supply.
Rating unit
This must be the LINE-TO-LINE voltage — 208, 230, 460 or 575 on a typical North American three-phase supply. Entering the line-to-neutral voltage changes the answer by a factor of √3 and is the most common error in this calculation.
V
From the nameplate — usually printed as NEMA nominal efficiency. Most modern premium-efficiency induction motors sit between 89 and 96 percent. Efficiency falls away below about half load.
%
From the nameplate, as a decimal. Typically 0.8 to 0.9 at full load for an induction motor, and it collapses much faster than efficiency at part load — a motor at 25 percent load can sit below 0.5.
Only read in the second mode. Use the mean of the three phases if they differ; a large imbalance is itself a fault worth investigating before you trust any of this arithmetic.
A
Line current
29.0794
I = P_shaft ÷ (√3 × V_line-to-line × η × PF). This is the physics, NOT a code sizing current: NEC 430.6(A)(1) requires the full-load current from NEC Table 430.250 — not the nameplate current and not this one — for sizing conductors, switches and branch-circuit protection. This page does not reproduce that table. Local amendments govern, adopted editions vary, and a licensed electrician or electrical engineer must sign off before work proceeds.
Electrical input power
19.9252 kW
Apparent power
23.1689 kVA
Shaft output
18.65 kW
Shaft output in the rating unit
25
Losses
1.2752 kW
Load as a percentage of the rating
100.00
Efficiency applied
93.60
Power factor applied
0.86
Reading of the result
A 25 hp (electric, 746 W) three-phase motor on a 460 V line-to-line supply, at 93.6 percent efficiency and a power factor of 0.86, draws I = P ÷ (√3 × V × η × PF) = 18650 W ÷ (1.7320508076 × 460 V × 0.936 × 0.86) = 29.0794 A of line current. It takes 19.9252 kW of electrical input to deliver 18.65 kW at the shaft, so 1.2752 kW becomes heat. The 460 V figure must be the LINE-TO-LINE voltage — the DOE fact sheet this √3 comes from specifies "RMS voltage, mean line-to-line of 3 phases". Using the line-to-neutral voltage instead changes the answer by a factor of √3. The result assumes a balanced, sinusoidal, steady-state supply and the nameplate efficiency and power factor you entered. Both fall away from their nameplate values at part load — power factor much faster than efficiency — so a lightly loaded motor draws more current than a straight proportion of this figure. Starting current is a different quantity again: a direct-on-line induction motor draws several times its running current for the first seconds, which is why motor protection is not sized on running current at all. NOT A CODE SIZING CURRENT. NEC 430.6(A)(1) requires that, other than for low-speed, high-torque and multispeed motors, the full-load current values in NEC Tables 430.247 through 430.250 be used to determine conductor ampacities and the ampere ratings of switches and branch-circuit short-circuit and ground-fault protection — instead of the current marked on the motor nameplate, and therefore instead of the current computed here. This page does not reproduce Table 430.250: the reproductions available disagree with one another in several cells, and a full-load current taken from a wrong table is worse than no table at all. Look the value up in the code edition adopted in your jurisdiction. Local amendments govern, adopted editions vary, and a licensed electrician or electrical engineer must sign off before any work proceeds.

Background.

A three-phase motor's amperage is not printed on the nameplate in a way you can use directly for every purpose, and the number that is printed there is not the number the electrical code makes you design around. This calculator handles the physics half of that problem in both directions: what current a motor of a known rating draws, and — clamp meter in hand — how heavily a running motor is actually loaded.

The forward calculation starts from a fact people routinely get backwards. A motor's horsepower or kilowatt rating is its SHAFT OUTPUT, the mechanical power it delivers to the pump, fan or conveyor. The electrical power it draws is always larger, by exactly the reciprocal of its efficiency. So the input power is the rated output divided by efficiency, and on a balanced three-phase supply that input power is √3 × V × I × PF. Rearranged for current: I = P_shaft ÷ (√3 × V × η × PF). A 25 hp motor on 460 volts at 93.6 percent efficiency and a power factor of 0.86 draws 29.08 amperes, takes 19.93 kW from the supply to deliver 18.65 kW at the shaft, and throws away the 1.28 kW difference as heat.

The voltage in that expression is the LINE-TO-LINE voltage. This is the single most common error in the calculation, and it is not a small one — using the line-to-neutral voltage moves the answer by a factor of √3, about 73 percent. The US Department of Energy fact sheet this page's √3 relation comes from is explicit about it: V is the "RMS voltage, mean line-to-line of 3 phases".

The reverse calculation is the one that saves money. Measure the running current, multiply by √3, the line-to-line voltage and the power factor, and you have the input power. Multiply by efficiency and you have the shaft power. Divide by the nameplate rating and you have the load factor — the quantity Equations 2 and 3 of that same DOE fact sheet exist to estimate. Motors are habitually oversized, and one running at 40 percent of its rating is doing so at a power factor far below its nameplate figure, which is precisely how a plant ends up paying a demand charge for reactive power it never needed.

One thing this page will not give you, and states beside the result rather than in a collapsed FAQ: a code sizing current. NEC 430.6(A)(1) requires that, other than for low-speed, high-torque and multispeed motors, the full-load current values in NEC Tables 430.247 through 430.250 be used to determine conductor ampacities and the ampere ratings of switches and branch-circuit short-circuit and ground-fault protection — instead of the current marked on the nameplate, and therefore instead of the current computed here. The point of that rule is standardisation: every 25 hp 460-volt motor gets designed around the same number regardless of who made it, so replacing the motor does not invalidate the wiring. This page does not reproduce Table 430.250, because the reproductions available to its author disagree with one another in several cells, and a full-load current taken from a wrong table is worse than no table at all. Look the value up in the code edition adopted where you are. Local amendments govern, adopted editions vary between jurisdictions, and a licensed electrician or electrical engineer must sign off before any work proceeds.

What is 3 phase motor amperage calculator?

Three-phase motor amperage is the line current an induction motor draws from a balanced three-phase supply. It follows from the motor's mechanical output rather than being an independent property: shaft power, divided by efficiency to get electrical input power, divided by √3 times the line-to-line voltage times the power factor to get current.

The vocabulary that matters is on the nameplate. Rated output is mechanical, in horsepower or kilowatts. Full-load efficiency is the fraction of input power that reaches the shaft at rated load. Power factor is the ratio of real power to apparent power — the extent to which the current is doing useful work rather than magnetising iron. Full-load amperes (FLA) is the manufacturer's own current figure at rated load. Locked-rotor amperes or the NEMA code letter describe the far larger inrush at start.

The calculator is valid for balanced, sinusoidal, steady-state operation of a three-phase induction motor. It is not valid across a variable-frequency drive without care — a VFD's input current and its motor-side current are different quantities and its harmonics break the √3 identity — and it says nothing about starting current, torque, temperature rise, service factor or duty cycle. Efficiency and power factor both fall at part load, power factor much faster, so a lightly loaded motor draws more current than a straight proportion of the full-load figure.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Choose the direction. Mode one goes from a nameplate rating to a current. Mode two goes from a measured current to a load percentage.
  2. Enter the nameplate rated output and pick its unit. If it says 'hp', electrical horsepower at 746 W is the conventional reading; the mechanical option is there because the DOE fact sheet and some manufacturers use 745.6999 W instead.
  3. Enter the LINE-TO-LINE supply voltage. On a 460 V three-phase system that is 460, not 266.
  4. Enter the nameplate full-load efficiency as a percentage and the nameplate power factor as a decimal. Both are printed on modern motors; if yours is old enough that they are not, the answer will only ever be an estimate and should be labelled as one.
  5. In mode two, enter the measured line current — the mean of the three phases if they differ.
  6. Read the line current, then the input power beneath it. The gap between input power and shaft output is the heat the motor makes, and it is what the ventilation has to remove.
  7. Do not take the current to the conductor or breaker calculation. NEC 430.6(A)(1) requires the value from Table 430.250 for that, and this page deliberately does not reproduce it.

The formula.

I = P_shaft ⁄ (√3 × V_LL × η × PF) Pi = √3 × V_LL × I × PF load% = (Pi × η) ⁄ P_rated × 100

Start from the energy balance rather than from a formula to memorise. Whatever electrical power goes into a motor either comes out of the shaft or comes out as heat, so input power equals shaft power divided by efficiency. For the 25 hp worked example that is 25 × 746 = 18,650 W of shaft power, and 18,650 ÷ 0.936 = 19,925.21 W of electrical input.

Now convert input power into current. On a balanced three-phase supply the real power is √3 × V × I × PF, where V is the line-to-line voltage — Equation 1 of the DOE fact sheet, quoted there as "Pi = V x I x PF x √3 / 1000" with V defined as the mean line-to-line voltage of the three phases. Rearranging: I = Pi ÷ (√3 × V × PF) = 19,925.21 ÷ (1.7320508076 × 460 × 0.86) = 29.0794 A. Substituting the first expression into the second gives the one-line form I = P_shaft ÷ (√3 × V × η × PF).

The √3 is not an approximation and it is not 1.732. It is carried here at forty significant digits. Where a source has rounded it, the difference shows up in the third significant figure, which is exactly what happens in the DOE fact sheet's own example — see the FAQ on the 22.9 kW figure.

Apparent power is the same product without the power factor: S = √3 × V × I = 23.1689 kVA for this motor, against 19.9252 kW of real power. That ratio is the power factor, and it is why a generator or transformer feeding motors is sized in kVA rather than kW.

Reading the identity backwards gives the load estimate. With a measured current, Pi = √3 × V × I × PF; multiply by efficiency for shaft power; divide by the rated shaft power for the load factor. That is the DOE sheet's Equation 2, printed there as "Pir = hp x 0.7457 / Efl", combined with its Equation 3, "Load = Pi / Pir x 100%" — together algebraically identical to the form used here, with 0.7457 kW being the mechanical horsepower this page exposes as a unit option.

Nothing is rounded at an intermediate step. Efficiency and power factor are applied as exact decimals, √3 at full precision, and the results are rounded once at the boundary.

A worked example.

Example

A 25 hp three-phase induction motor on a 460-volt line-to-line supply, with a nameplate full-load efficiency of 93.6 percent and a nameplate power factor of 0.86. Shaft output first: 25 hp × 746 W/hp = 18,650 W, or 18.65 kW. Electrical input is that divided by efficiency: 18,650 ÷ 0.936 = 19,925.21 W, or 19.9252136752 kW. The difference, 1.2752136752 kW, is what the motor turns into heat — copper losses in the windings, iron losses in the core, friction and windage. Current follows from the input power: I = 19,925.21 ÷ (√3 × 460 × 0.86) = 19,925.21 ÷ 685.199 = 29.0794425658 amperes. Apparent power is the same product with the power factor stripped out: √3 × 460 × 29.0794425658 ÷ 1000 = 23.1688531107 kVA. The gap between 23.17 kVA and 19.93 kW is precisely the 0.86 power factor, and it is the reason a generator sized to run this motor is specified in kVA. Switch the rating unit to mechanical horsepower and the shaft output becomes 18.6424967896 kW instead of 18.65, moving the current down by 0.04 percent — far below any nameplate tolerance, but a difference this page shows rather than hides. None of these numbers is a code sizing current. For conductors, switches and branch-circuit protection, NEC 430.6(A)(1) sends you to Table 430.250 instead.

volts460
efficiency Percent93.6
rated Output UnithpElectric
measured Amps29.079
rated Output25
solve Forcurrent
power Factor0.86

Frequently asked questions.

How do I calculate the amperage of a 3 phase motor?
Divide the shaft power by the product of √3, the line-to-line voltage, the efficiency and the power factor: I = P_shaft ÷ (√3 × V × η × PF). Convert horsepower to watts first at 746 W per hp. For a 25 hp motor at 460 V, 93.6 percent efficiency and 0.86 power factor that is 18,650 ÷ (1.732 × 460 × 0.936 × 0.86) = 29.08 A. Leaving the efficiency out — a common shortcut — understates the current by whatever the losses are, here by about 6 percent.
Should I use the line-to-line or the line-to-neutral voltage?
Line-to-line, always, in this formula. The DOE fact sheet that defines the relation specifies "RMS voltage, mean line-to-line of 3 phases". On a 480/277 V system that means 480, not 277; on a 208/120 V system it means 208, not 120. Using the line-to-neutral figure inflates the current by a factor of √3, about 73 percent, and it is the error that most often makes a hand calculation disagree with a clamp meter.
Can I use this amperage to size the wire and the breaker?
No, and this is the most important limitation on the page. NEC 430.6(A)(1) requires that, other than for low-speed, high-torque and multispeed motors, the full-load current values in NEC Tables 430.247 through 430.250 be used to determine conductor ampacities and the ampere ratings of switches and branch-circuit protection — instead of the nameplate current, and therefore instead of this calculated one. The rule exists so that every motor of a given horsepower and voltage is designed around the same standardised number and a replacement motor does not invalidate the wiring. Look the value up in the code edition adopted in your jurisdiction.
Why does this page not include NEC Table 430.250?
Because the reproductions of it available to the author disagree with one another in several cells, and there was no way to resolve the disagreement against the code text itself, which is behind NFPA's registration wall. A full-load current taken from a wrong table is confidently wrong, which is worse than absent — it is the same reason a superseded fitness-test scoring table is more dangerous than no table. The page narrows to what it can source: the electrical identity, stated exactly.
Why is the calculated current different from my motor's nameplate FLA?
Several reasons, and none of them means either number is wrong. The nameplate FLA is the manufacturer's measured value for that specific design, at its own tested efficiency and power factor, and it already reflects the machine's real losses. The calculated value uses the nameplate efficiency and power factor, both of which are printed rounded and both of which are full-load figures. Supply voltage is rarely exactly nominal, and the current moves inversely with it. Expect agreement within a few percent; a large gap usually means the efficiency or power factor entered is not the full-load one.
How do I tell whether my motor is oversized?
Use the second mode. Measure the running line current with a clamp meter, take the mean of the three phases, and enter it with the nameplate voltage, efficiency and power factor. The load percentage that comes back is the shaft power as a fraction of the rating. Consistently below about 50 percent and the motor is oversized: it is running at a much poorer power factor than its nameplate suggests, and on a plant with a demand charge that costs real money. This is the calculation the DOE fact sheet exists to support.
Is a horsepower 746 watts or 745.7 watts?
Both, depending on which horsepower. NIST Special Publication 811 lists horsepower (electric) as exactly 746 W and horsepower (550 ft·lbf/s), the mechanical one, as 745.6999 W. Electrical practice uses 746; the DOE motor fact sheet uses the mechanical value, rounded to 0.7457 kW. They differ by 0.04 percent, which is an order of magnitude below the tolerance on any nameplate efficiency figure. This page exposes both as unit options rather than burying the choice in the code.
Does this work for a motor on a variable-frequency drive?
Not without care. A VFD has two different currents — what it draws from the supply and what it delivers to the motor — and they are not the same number. The drive's input current is distorted by harmonics, which breaks the √3 × V × I × PF identity this page is built on, and the motor-side waveform is not sinusoidal either. Use the drive manufacturer's own input-current figure for the supply side and treat this page as applying only to across-the-line operation.

References& sources.

  1. [1]US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 'Determining Electric Motor Load and Efficiency', fact sheet DOE/GO-10097-517 (January 1997). Source of Equation 1, 'Pi = V x I x PF x √3 / 1000', with V defined as 'RMS voltage, mean line-to-line of 3 phases' and I as 'RMS current, mean of 3 phases'; and of the load estimate, its Equation 2, 'Pir = hp x 0.7457 / Efl' (input power at full-rated load), combined with its Equation 3, 'Load = Pi / Pir x 100%' — together Load = Pi ÷ (hp × 0.7457 ÷ Efl) × 100%. Also the source of the worked example (469.7 V, 37 A, PF 0.763) used as this page's independent check. Authority: US DOE / EERE. Document revision: January 1997. Locator: Equations 1, 2 and 3, and the worked example. Access: open. Independence: primary. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  2. [2]NIST Special Publication 811, 'Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)', Appendix B.9 'Factors for units listed alphabetically'. Source of both horsepower definitions: horsepower (electric) = 7.46 E+02 W exactly, and horsepower (550 ft·lbf/s) = 7.456 999 E+02 W. The exact mechanical value used here, 745.6998715822702 W, follows from the international foot (0.3048 m) and pound-force (4.4482216152605 N) and is asserted in the test suite. Authority: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Document revision: SP 811, 2008 edition. Locator: Appendix B.9. Access: open. Independence: primary. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  3. [3]NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, 430.6(A)(1) 'Ampacity and Motor Rating Determination — General Motor Applications', reproduced by ElectricalLicenseRenewal: other than for motors built for low speeds (less than 1200 RPM) or high torques, and for multispeed motors, the values given in Tables 430.247 through 430.250 shall be used to determine the ampacity of conductors or ampere ratings of switches and branch-circuit short-circuit and ground-fault protection, instead of the actual current rating marked on the motor nameplate. This is the rule that makes the current computed on this page unusable for code sizing, and it is stated beside the result. Authority: NFPA, via an open code-reproduction host. Locator: 430.6(A)(1). Access: gated at NFPA, open at the reproduction. Independence: primary text, secondary host. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  4. [4]EC&M (Electrical Construction & Maintenance), 'Motors and the NEC' — independent confirmation that NEC Article 430 sizes motor circuits from the Table 430.247–430.250 full-load current rather than the nameplate value, and that motor branch-circuit protection and overload protection are separate devices under 430.52 and 430.32 respectively. Used to check the scope statement, not to source any numeric value. Authority: EC&M / Endeavor Business Media. Access: open. Independence: secondary-check. Result: agree. Retrieved 2026-07-29.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 977 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon