Audited 29 Jul 2026·Last updated 31 Jul 2026·7 citations·Tier 1·0 uses

Wire Size Calculator (NEC Ampacity and Voltage Drop)

Size copper or aluminium wire against NEC Table 310.16 ampacity, temperature and bundling derates, termination limits, and the drop over your actual run.

Wire Size Calculator

What are you sizing?
The real running current of the load in branch-circuit mode — not the breaker you plan to use. In dwelling-service mode this is the service or feeder rating instead, and it must be between 100 A and 400 A.
A
120 for a standard receptacle circuit, 240 for a dryer, range, EV charger or a residential service, 208 or 480 line-to-line for commercial three-phase. This is the number the voltage-drop percentage is measured against. Low-voltage DC systems belong on the DC wire size calculator instead.
V
Phase
Conductor material
Conductor insulation temperature rating
Equipment termination rating
Is the load continuous?
Table 310.16 is built on 30 °C (86 °F). An attic in summer, a rooftop raceway or a boiler room is routinely 45–60 °C, and that is where ampacity quietly disappears — a 90 °C conductor keeps only 82% of its rating at 50 °C and 58% at 70 °C.
°C
Count only conductors that actually carry current. Equipment grounding conductors never count, and the neutral of a balanced three-phase four-wire circuit does not count either — but the neutral of a three-wire circuit fed from two phases of a three-phase system does. Four to six conductors costs you 20% of the ampacity; ten to twenty costs half of it.
Panel to load, measured along the route the cable actually takes, not straight-line. The calculator doubles it for the return path on single phase. Measure generously: bends, drops and the loop inside the panel all count.
ft
3% is the figure NEC 210.19(A) Informational Note No. 4 recommends for a branch circuit, and 5% for feeder plus branch circuit combined. Informational Notes are not enforceable code — but several jurisdictions adopt them by local amendment, and equipment does not care what the code says about it.
%
Conductor size to install
1 AWG copper — governed by ampacity. This is a 100 A non-continuous load needing 100 A of conductor ampacity, with 60 °C terminations, 90 °C insulation, a 1.00 ambient correction and a 1.00 bundling adjustment. Verify against the code edition your jurisdiction has actually adopted and have a licensed electrician sign off before any of it is installed.
The larger of the two answers below, because a conductor has to satisfy both at once. Sized against NFPA 70 (National Electrical Code), 2023 edition — Table 310.16, Table 310.15(B)(1), Table 310.15(C)(1), 110.14(C), 240.4(D) and 240.6(A). LOCAL AMENDMENTS GOVERN and the adopted edition varies by jurisdiction; some are still on the 2017 or 2020 NEC and many cities amend the tables. A licensed electrician must sign off on the conductor, the terminations and the overcurrent device before any work proceeds. This page does not cover motor circuits (Article 430), air-conditioning equipment (Article 440), parallel conductor sets (310.10(G)), or low-voltage DC.
Minimum size on ampacity
1 AWG copper — the smallest size whose 90 °C ampacity, after the 1.00 ambient correction and 1.00 bundling adjustment and capped at the 60 °C termination column, still reaches 100 A. It gets there with 110 A.
Minimum size on voltage drop
4 AWG copper — the smallest size with at least 35833 circular mils, which is what holds the drop over 100 ft one-way to 3 % of 240 V. Voltage drop is a recommendation in NEC 210.19(A) Informational Note No. 4, not an enforceable rule — unless your jurisdiction has adopted it by amendment, which several have.
Ampacity the conductor must have
100 A
Ampacity the chosen conductor actually has
110 A
Voltage drop on the run
3.0828 V
Voltage drop as a percentage
1.28
Voltage at the load
236.9172 V
Overcurrent device
100 A
Code basis and limits
Sized against NFPA 70, 2023 edition: Table 310.16 ampacities, Table 310.15(B)(1) ambient correction, Table 310.15(C)(1) bundling adjustment, 110.14(C) termination limits, 240.4(D) small-conductor limits and 240.6(A) standard device ratings. LOCAL AMENDMENTS GOVERN and adopted editions vary by jurisdiction — some are still on the 2017 or 2020 NEC, some are already on 2026, and many cities amend the tables. This is a design aid, not a permit: a licensed electrician must confirm the conductor, the terminations and the overcurrent device before work proceeds. Low-voltage DC systems are not covered here, and boats are governed by ABYC E-11 rather than the NEC.

Background.

There are two completely different reasons a wire can be too small, and almost every argument about wire sizing comes from someone thinking about one of them while someone else thinks about the other. The first reason is heat. Current warms a conductor, the conductor warms its insulation, and if the insulation runs above its rating for long enough it hardens, cracks and eventually stops being insulation. That is what the National Electrical Code's ampacity tables exist to prevent, and it is the half that an inspector enforces. The second reason is voltage. Every foot of conductor has resistance, so some of the supply voltage is spent getting to the load rather than delivered to it. Nothing catches fire when this happens. The lights just dim, the motor runs hot and slow, the well pump takes longer to start, and the run is legal the whole time.

This calculator answers both, separately, and then gives you the larger of the two. On a short run inside a house, heat almost always wins and the code table is the whole answer. On a long run — a shop at the back of a property, a well, a barn, a gate operator, a parking-lot light — voltage drop wins, often by two or three trade sizes, and a conductor picked from an ampacity chart alone will be perfectly compliant and perfectly useless.

The ampacity half is more involved than a single lookup, which is why so many charts on the internet are wrong in the same way. Four separate rules stack on top of Table 310.16. Ambient temperature corrects the table figure, because the table assumes 30 °C air and a summer attic or a rooftop raceway is nothing like 30 °C. The number of current-carrying conductors bundled together adjusts it again, because conductors in a bundle heat each other. NEC 110.14(C) then caps whatever survives at the temperature rating of the equipment terminals — this is the rule that catches people, because it means a 90 °C conductor connected to a 60 °C-rated breaker is treated as a 60 °C conductor for the final selection, no matter what the jacket says. And 240.4(D) puts a hard ceiling on the overcurrent device protecting 14, 12 and 10 AWG regardless of what the table says those conductors could carry. Miss any one of these and you get an answer that is one size small in exactly the conditions where being one size small matters.

The page has a second mode for one-family dwelling services and feeders, because NEC 310.12 gives those a genuinely different rule: the conductors may be sized at 83% of the service rating rather than at 100% of it, on the reasoning that a house never actually draws its full service rating continuously. That single sentence is why a 200 A house service is wired in 2/0 copper or 4/0 aluminium rather than the 3/0 copper an ordinary 200 A feeder would need. Applying the 83% and reading the 75 °C column of Table 310.16 reproduces every published row of Table 310.12 exactly, for both materials, from 100 A to 400 A — a check this calculator's test suite runs on every build.

Two scope limits, stated here rather than buried in an FAQ. This is AC premises wiring. Low-voltage DC — 12 V, 24 V and 48 V battery, solar, RV and automotive systems — behaves differently enough that it has its own page: at 12 V a 3% budget is 0.36 V, so voltage drop governs essentially every run and the ampacity table barely participates. And boats are not NEC territory at all; they are governed by ABYC E-11, which uses its own ampacity table, its own resistance constant, and a 3%/10% split between critical and non-critical circuits.

The last limit is the one that matters most. This is a design aid. The edition of the NEC your jurisdiction has adopted may not be the 2023 edition this page implements, local amendments routinely override the tables, and no calculator has seen your panel, your terminals, your derating conditions or your inspector. A licensed electrician has to sign off before any of this gets installed.

What is wire size calculator?

Wire size, in North American practice, is a conductor's cross-sectional area expressed as an American Wire Gauge number or, above 4/0, in thousands of circular mils. The gauge scale runs backwards — 14 AWG is small, 4/0 AWG is large — and each three steps down the gauge roughly doubles the area. A circular mil is the area of a circle one thousandth of an inch across, which makes it an awkward unit until you meet the voltage-drop equation, where it turns out to be exactly the unit that makes the arithmetic simple.

Ampacity is the current a conductor can carry continuously without exceeding its temperature rating. It is a property of the conductor in its installed conditions, not of the conductor alone: the same 8 AWG THHN is a 55 A conductor in the 90 °C column of Table 310.16, a 50 A conductor once its 75 °C terminations are taken into account, and a 38.5 A conductor if it shares a raceway with eight others. Ampacity is what the code enforces and what the overcurrent device protects.

Voltage drop is the loss along the run, and it is governed by Ohm's law rather than by the code. The trade equation is VD = 2·K·I·L/CM, where I is the current, L is the one-way length in feet, CM is the circular-mil area, and K is a resistance constant — 12.9 for copper and 21.2 for aluminium, both at 75 °C, both derived from NEC Chapter 9 Table 8. The 2 accounts for the fact that current has to come back; on a three-phase circuit it becomes √3.

The two constraints are independent and they do not scale together. Doubling the length doubles the drop and does nothing at all to the ampacity requirement. Bundling ten conductors halves the usable ampacity and does nothing to the drop. That is why a conductor has to be checked against both, and why the answer is whichever of them demands more.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Choose the sizing basis. Use the dwelling-service mode only for a service or feeder carrying the entire load of one dwelling unit on a single-phase 120/240 V system at 100–400 A. Everything else — every branch circuit, every subpanel feeder in a commercial building, every three-phase feeder — is the branch-circuit mode.
  2. Enter the real load current, not the breaker size. Sizing to the breaker is how you end up with an expensively oversized run, and it is not what NEC 210.19(A)(1) asks for. If you only know watts, divide by the voltage first.
  3. Set the system voltage. This is what the drop percentage is measured against, so getting it wrong quietly scales the whole voltage-drop answer.
  4. Pick the conductor material and its insulation rating. Modern building wire is nearly always 90 °C dual-rated THHN/THWN-2 — check the printing on the jacket rather than assuming.
  5. Set the termination rating. If you can read the breaker and panel labels and they say 75 °C, choose 75 °C and you will often save a trade size. If you cannot, leave it on 'auto', which takes the conservative 110.14(C) default.
  6. Say whether the load is continuous. Anything running three hours or more — EV charging, commercial lighting, electric heat — is continuous, and the conductor has to be sized for 125% of it.
  7. Enter the real ambient temperature and the real conductor count. An attic in July is not 30 °C, and a raceway with three circuits in it is not three conductors.
  8. Measure the run along the route the cable actually takes, not straight-line, and be generous — bends, drops and the loop inside the panel all count.
  9. Read both minimum sizes, not just the recommendation. Which one governs tells you what to change: if ampacity governs, better terminations or cooler routing help; if voltage drop governs, only more copper does.
  10. Take the result to a licensed electrician, and confirm which NEC edition and which local amendments your jurisdiction has actually adopted before anything is bought or pulled.

The formula.

I_req = I × 1.25 (continuous) · A_usable = min( A_table(T_ins) × C_amb × C_bundle , A_table(T_term) ) · VD = 2 · K · I · L / CM

The ampacity side starts with the load and ends with a table row, and there are four steps in between that all have to happen in the right order.

Step one is the code minimum. NEC 210.19(A)(1) requires a branch-circuit conductor to have an ampacity of at least the non-continuous load plus 125% of the continuous load. A 40 A load that runs for three hours or more therefore needs 50 A of conductor ampacity, not 40 A. On a one-family dwelling service the rule is the opposite direction: NEC 310.12 permits 83% of the rating, so a 100 A service needs 83 A of ampacity rather than 100 A.

Step two is the two derating factors, and they multiply. Table 310.15(B)(1) corrects for ambient temperature relative to the table's 30 °C basis — a 90 °C conductor keeps 96% of its rating at 31–35 °C, 82% at 46–50 °C and 29% at 81–85 °C. Table 310.15(C)(1) adjusts for bundling: 80% for four to six current-carrying conductors, 70% for seven to nine, 50% for ten to twenty. Both are applied to the figure in the conductor's own insulation column, which is why a 90 °C conductor is worth buying even when it is going to be connected to 75 °C terminals — you derate from the bigger starting number.

Step three is the termination limit, and it is where the answer usually gets decided. NEC 110.14(C) says the conductor's ampacity for selection purposes cannot exceed the figure in the column matching the equipment terminals: 60 °C for equipment rated 100 A or less unless it is listed and identified for 75 °C, and 75 °C above 100 A. So the usable ampacity is the smaller of the derated figure and the termination-column figure. In the worked example, 8 AWG copper is 55 A in the 90 °C column with no derating at all, but its 75 °C figure is 50 A, and 50 A is what it is worth.

Step four is NEC 240.4(D), which caps the overcurrent device on 14, 12 and 10 AWG at 15, 20 and 30 A for copper and at 15 and 25 A for 12 and 10 AWG aluminium, whatever the table says those conductors could carry. This is why a 25 A required ampacity cannot be run on 12 AWG copper even though the 75 °C column says 25 A: the breaker protecting it may not exceed 20 A.

The voltage-drop side is a single equation with one subtlety. VD = 2·K·I·L/CM, where K is 12.9 for copper and 21.2 for aluminium — those are the DC resistance of a 1000-circular-mil conductor 1000 ft long at 75 °C, taken from NEC Chapter 9 Table 8. The 2 is the out-and-back path; on three phase it becomes √3. Rearranged to solve for the conductor, CM = 2·K·I·L / VD_allowed, and the calculator takes the smallest standard size whose circular-mil area reaches that number. The subtlety is which current to use: the 125% continuous adjustment is a code minimum for heating, not a prediction of current, so voltage drop is always calculated on the real running current. Using the inflated figure would push the conductor up for no physical reason.

The two answers are then compared and the larger one wins, because a conductor has to satisfy both simultaneously. Every comparison — which correction band, which conductor size, which standard device rating — is made on the unrounded value, and rounding to ten decimal places happens once, at the return boundary. The ambient correction band is a step function on whole degrees, so 30.0 °C is the 26–30 band and 30.1 °C has already stepped into 31–35; that boundary is tested explicitly.

One approximation is worth naming. The DC-resistance method ignores reactance and assumes unity power factor. It is the method the trade uses and it is accurate for the runs most people are sizing, but from about 2/0 upward self-inductance starts to matter, and for a long large three-phase run at a poor power factor the more exact route is NEC Chapter 9 Table 9, which tabulates AC resistance and reactance for conductors in PVC, aluminium and steel conduit separately.

A worked example.

Example

A 40 A EV charger is going on the far side of the garage: 240 V single phase, 90 ft of THHN copper from the panel, three current-carrying conductors in the raceway, 30 °C ambient, and the panel's lugs are labelled 75 °C. EV charging is a continuous load by definition, so NEC 625.41 and 210.19(A)(1) both point the same way. Start with the required ampacity. 40 A continuous means 40 × 1.25 = 50 A of conductor ampacity. That is the number every subsequent step is compared against. Now the ampacity side. There is no ambient correction to apply — 30 °C is the table's own basis, so the factor is 1.00 — and there is no bundling adjustment either, because three current-carrying conductors is the table's basis too. So the derating is entirely in the termination rule. 10 AWG copper is 40 A in the 90 °C column, which already fails 50 A, and its 75 °C figure is only 35 A. 8 AWG copper is 55 A at 90 °C, but NEC 110.14(C) caps it at the 75 °C column, which is 50 A. Fifty is exactly what is needed, so 8 AWG copper is the minimum on ampacity, with nothing to spare. Now the voltage-drop side, which has to be checked independently. The budget is 3% of 240 V, which is 7.2 V. Rearranging VD = 2·K·I·L/CM gives CM = 2 × 12.9 × 40 × 90 / 7.2 = 12,900 circular mils. Note the current here is 40 A, not 50 A — the 125% is a code minimum for heating, not a prediction of what will flow. 10 AWG is 10,380 circular mils, which is short; 8 AWG is 16,510, which is not. So 8 AWG copper is also the minimum on voltage drop. Both constraints land on the same conductor, which is unusual and is why this example is worth working: neither half alone would have told you the answer was tight. Install 8 AWG copper on a 50 A breaker — the smallest standard rating in NEC 240.6(A) at or above 50 A, and 240.4(D) does not cap anything at 8 AWG. The drop on that conductor is 2 × 12.9 × 40 × 90 / 16,510 = 5.63 V, which is 2.34% of 240 V, leaving 234.37 V at the charger. Comfortably inside the budget, but only because 8 AWG was already forced by ampacity: at 3% the 10 AWG conductor would have missed by about a quarter of a size. Stretch the same circuit to 200 ft and the picture changes completely. Ampacity does not care — it is still 8 AWG. Voltage drop needs 2 × 12.9 × 40 × 200 / 7.2 = 28,667 circular mils, which 6 AWG's 26,240 does not reach, so the answer becomes 4 AWG: two trade sizes larger, bought entirely to stop the charger from throttling, and completely invisible to anyone reading an ampacity chart.

phasesingle
conductor Materialcopper
insulation Rating90
ambient Temp C30
sizing BasisbranchCircuit
one Way Length Ft90
termination Rating75
max Voltage Drop Percent3
current Carrying Conductors3
continuous Loadyes
load Amps40
system Voltage240

Frequently asked questions.

What size wire do I need for 100 amps?
It depends on which of two code rules applies, and the two answers differ. As an ordinary feeder — a subpanel in a detached garage, say — 100 A needs 3 AWG copper or 1 AWG aluminium if the equipment terminals are listed for 75 °C, and 1 AWG copper or 1/0 aluminium if they are only rated 60 °C, which NEC 110.14(C)(1)(a) is the default assumption for a device rated 100 A or less. As the service or feeder for a single-family dwelling, NEC 310.12 permits 83% of the rating, so 83 A of ampacity is enough and 4 AWG copper or 2 AWG aluminium is the published answer in Table 310.12. Then check the run length: at 100 A over 100 ft on 240 V, a 3% budget wants 35,833 circular mils, which lands on 4 AWG — so on a long feeder voltage drop can end up asking for more than ampacity does.
Why does my breaker size not decide my wire size?
Because the conductor is sized from the load and the breaker is sized to protect the conductor, not the other way round. NEC 210.19(A)(1) sizes the conductor for the non-continuous load plus 125% of the continuous load; 240.4 then requires the overcurrent device to protect that conductor. Working backwards from a breaker you have already chosen gives you a conductor sized for a load you do not have, which is expensive on a long run and can be genuinely wrong on a small one — 240.4(D) will not let you put a 30 A breaker on 12 AWG copper no matter what the ampacity table says. There are exceptions where the device really does lead, motor circuits under Article 430 being the big one, but they are exceptions with their own tables.
Is voltage drop actually required by the NEC?
No, and this catches people out in both directions. The 3% branch-circuit and 5% total figures live in NEC 210.19(A) Informational Note No. 4 and 215.2(A)(1) Informational Note No. 2, and Informational Notes are explicitly not enforceable requirements — they are guidance for 'reasonable efficiency of operation'. So an inspector generally cannot fail a run for voltage drop under the base code. But several jurisdictions adopt those numbers as mandatory local amendments, a few specific applications do have enforceable limits, and the equipment at the far end has no opinion on the distinction. A motor at 10% under voltage draws more current and runs hotter to make the same torque; an LED driver browns out; a well pump takes longer to start every single time. Treat 3% as a design target you chose, not as a rule someone imposed.
Can I use the 90 °C column if my wire says 90 °C on it?
For the derating arithmetic, yes. For the final selection, almost never. NEC 110.14(C) says the conductor's ampacity for selection cannot exceed the value in the column matching the equipment terminals, and equipment terminals are rated 60 °C or 75 °C — 90 °C terminals are rare in ordinary building equipment. What the 90 °C rating buys you is a bigger starting number to derate from: an 8 AWG THHN in a hot attic starts at 55 A and loses 18% to a 50 °C ambient, landing at 45.1 A, whereas the same conductor treated as 75 °C would start at 50 A and land lower. Then the 75 °C termination cap of 50 A is applied to whichever figure survived. Buy the 90 °C wire; just do not connect it as if the terminals were 90 °C too.
How much aluminium do I need instead of copper?
Usually one to two trade sizes more, and for two separate reasons that happen to point the same way. On ampacity, aluminium runs about one size behind: 4/0 aluminium is 180 A at 75 °C where 4/0 copper is 230 A, and you have to go to 300 kcmil aluminium to match 4/0 copper. On voltage drop, aluminium's resistance constant is 21.2 against copper's 12.9 — about 1.64 times — so the same drop needs about 64% more circular mils. Table 310.16 does not list 14 AWG aluminium at all, so the smallest aluminium building conductor is 12 AWG. Modern AA-8000 series aluminium building wire is a perfectly good conductor and is standard for services and large feeders on cost grounds; it needs terminations listed for aluminium and the correct antioxidant and torque procedure, which is a workmanship issue rather than a sizing one.
What counts as a current-carrying conductor for the bundling derate?
Every ungrounded conductor counts. Equipment grounding conductors never count. The neutral is the awkward one: a neutral carrying only the unbalanced current of a normally balanced three-phase four-wire system does not count, but the neutral of a two-wire circuit does, and so does the neutral of a three-wire circuit fed from two phases of a three-phase four-wire system, because it carries roughly the same current as the phases. The practical trap is that three 20 A circuits sharing a conduit is six current-carrying conductors if each has its own neutral, not three — and six conductors costs you 20% of the ampacity. The derate also applies to conductors bundled without spacing for more than 24 inches, not just to conduit.
Does this work for 12 V, 24 V or solar and RV wiring?
No, and it would give misleading answers if you forced it. Use the DC wire size calculator instead. The reason is arithmetic rather than doctrine: a 3% budget is 7.2 V on a 240 V circuit and 0.36 V on a 12 V circuit, so at low voltage the drop constraint is roughly twenty times tighter and it governs essentially every run of any length. A 20 A load 15 ft away needs 12 AWG on a 120 V circuit and 6 AWG on a 12 V circuit. Boats are a further step removed: they are governed by ABYC E-11, not the NEC, which uses its own ampacity tables, its own resistance constant, and splits the budget 3% for critical circuits and 10% for non-critical ones.
Which NEC edition does this use, and does that matter?
It implements NFPA 70, 2023 edition. It matters, but less than you might fear for these particular tables: the ampacity values in Table 310.16 are unchanged from the 2011 edition, when the same table was numbered 310.15(B)(16), through the 2020 renumbering to 310.16 and into 2023. The 310.12 dwelling rule is newer — it was a 2020 addition replacing the old 'Table 310.15(B)(7)' treatment — and the 2026 edition has clarified its wording again. What matters far more than the edition is your jurisdiction: adopted editions lag by years and vary state by state and city by city, and local amendments to conductor and derating requirements are common. Confirm both with your authority having jurisdiction before you buy wire.
When should I not use this calculator at all?
Motor branch circuits, which are sized from the Article 430 full-load-current tables at 125% and protected quite differently from ordinary loads. Air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment, which follows Article 440 and its nameplate minimum-circuit-ampacity marking. Parallel conductor sets under 310.10(G), which are an engineered design with their own rules about equal length and terminations. Anything above 1000 kcmil. Conduit fill, which is a separate Chapter 9 calculation. Service-entrance conductors for anything other than a one-family dwelling. And any situation where you are not sure what the terminations are rated at — in that case the honest answer is to read the label on the equipment, not to guess a column.

References& sources.

  1. [1]National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 70 — National Electrical Code, 2023 edition. Table 310.16, "Ampacities of Insulated Conductors with Not More Than Three Current-Carrying Conductors in Raceway, Cable, or Earth (Directly Buried), Based on Ambient Temperature of 30 °C (86 °F)". Source of every ampacity in this calculator. The code text itself is gated behind NFPA's free-access registration; the values used here were read from two independent reproductions and cross-checked against each other (see the dossier). Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  2. [2]NECA/IBEW Electricians, reproduction of NEC Table 310.15(B)(16) (formerly Table 310.16), "Allowable Ampacities of Insulated Conductors Rated Up to and Including 2000 Volts, 60 °C Through 90 °C". Read directly from the PDF on 2026-07-29. Used as the primary transcription source for the ampacity table. This is the 2011-edition numbering; every value is identical to the 2023-edition Table 310.16, which is the cross-edition check recorded in the dossier.
  3. [3]Conduit.site, reproduction of NEC Table 310.15(B)(1), "Ambient Temperature Correction Factors Based on 30 °C (86 °F)", 2020 NEC. Retrieved 2026-07-29. Source of all thirty-nine correction factors implemented here, across the 60 °C, 75 °C and 90 °C columns and the sixteen ambient bands from '10 °C or less' to '81–85 °C', including the points at which the 60 °C and 75 °C columns terminate and the conductor may no longer be used.
  4. [4]Mike Holt Enterprises, "Voltage Drop Calculations". Retrieved 2026-07-29. Source of the K constants used here — 12.9 ohm-circular-mils per foot for copper and 21.2 for aluminium, both defined as the DC resistance of a 1000-circular-mil conductor 1000 ft long at 75 °C, derived from NEC Chapter 9 Table 8 — of the VD = 2·K·I·L/CM and √3·K·I·L/CM forms, and of the stated limit that the method is suitable up to 1/0 with self-inductance needing a Q adjustment at 2/0 and above.
  5. [5]Zing², reproduction of NEC Table 310.15(C)(1), "Adjustment Factors for More Than Three Current-Carrying Conductors", noted as unchanged across the 2020, 2023 and 2026 editions. Retrieved 2026-07-29. Source of the 80 / 70 / 50 / 45 / 40 / 35 percent bands and of the rule that grounding conductors and the neutral of a balanced three-phase system are excluded from the count.
  6. [6]WireRef, "NEC Article 240 — Overcurrent Protection", 2023 edition with 2026 updates noted. Retrieved 2026-07-29. Source of the 240.6(A) standard ampere ratings list (15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 600 A and above), of the 240.4(D) small-conductor limits for copper (14, 12 and 10 AWG at 15, 20 and 30 A — the page does not reproduce the aluminium limits of 15 A on 12 AWG and 25 A on 10 AWG, which are stated in 240.4(D) itself), and of the 240.4(B) next-higher-standard-rating allowance.
  7. [7]American Boat and Yacht Council, Standard E-11, "AC and DC Electrical Systems on Boats", excerpts published by Paneltronics. Read directly from the PDF on 2026-07-29. Cited as the scope boundary rather than as an input: E-11.14.2.6 requires 3 percent maximum drop on main feeders, bilge blowers, electronic equipment and navigation lights and 10 percent on non-critical circuits, and E-11.14.2.7 sizes conductors from ABYC's own Tables VI, IX and X. Marine wiring must be sized from those tables, not from the NEC tables this page implements.

In this category

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 977 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon