Audited ·Last updated 29 Jul 2026·4 citations·Tier 2·0 uses

Email Open Rate Calculator — Reported and MPP-Adjusted

Calculate email open rate on delivered emails, then strip out Apple Mail Privacy Protection machine opens to see what humans actually did.

Email Open Rate Calculator

Which open rate do you want as the headline?
Everything the send attempted, bounces included.
Delivered is sent minus bounces — Mailchimp defines successful deliveries as "the number of recipients who didn't hard or soft bounce on this email". Delivered is the denominator for every open rate on this page.
Recipients who registered at least one open — not total opens. If the number you have exceeds the emails delivered, you are holding total opens and the calculator will say so.
Take this from your own platform's bot-filtering or Apple-MPP report. This page bakes in no assumption about how common machine opens are, because no authority publishes a defensible universal figure. Enter 0 and all three rates collapse onto the reported one.
Open rate
31.76
Opens divided by emails delivered, on the basis you selected. Read it with the note directly below: since September 2021 a raw open rate counts machines as well as people.
What this rate counts
Basis: as your platform reports it — every recorded open divided by the emails delivered. Apple Mail downloads remote content "in the background by default — regardless of whether you engage with the email", so this figure counts machines alongside people. Open tracking is image-based: an open is recorded when the tracking pixel loads or a link is clicked. It therefore undercounts recipients who block images and overcounts recipients behind a privacy proxy. Treat open rate as a deliverability diagnostic and judge performance on clicks and conversions.
Emails delivered
48,800
Delivery rate
97.60%
Bounce rate
2.40%
Reported open rate
31.76%
Human open rate — lower bound
19.06%
Open rate among observable recipients
21.83%
Open rate if you divide by sent
31.00%
Share of opens that were machines
40.00%

Background.

Email open rate is unique opens divided by emails delivered. Two independent platforms define it identically: Mailchimp calls it "a percentage that tells you how many successfully delivered emails were opened by recipients," with successful deliveries being "the number of recipients who didn't hard or soft bounce"; HubSpot calls it the "percentage of recipients who opened the email out of the number who received it." So the arithmetic is settled. What is not settled is whether the numerator means anything.

Open tracking works by embedding a tiny remote image and counting requests for it. HubSpot states the mechanism plainly: "An email open is counted when the images in the email load, or when a recipient clicks on a link in the email." That worked tolerably until Apple shipped Mail Privacy Protection in September 2021. Apple's own privacy documentation describes what it does: Mail "downloads remote content in the background by default — regardless of whether you engage with the email," and routes those requests "through two separate relays operated by different entities." A protected recipient therefore registers an open without reading anything, and does so at a time and from an IP address that tell you nothing. Mailchimp says the consequence in one sentence: "Bot activity such as Apple's Mail Privacy Protection (MPP) can falsely inflate open and click metrics."

This calculator does not pretend that away and it does not guess your way out of it either. It bakes in no assumption about how common machine opens are, because no authority publishes a defensible universal figure and your share depends entirely on how much of your list is on Apple Mail. You supply the machine-open count from your own platform's bot-filtering report, and the page then gives you three readings of the same send. The reported rate is what your dashboard shows, machines included — an upper bound. The lower bound removes machine opens from the numerator while leaving every recipient in the denominator; it is guaranteed too low, because protected recipients who genuinely did open have been discarded along with the machines. The observable-audience rate removes those recipients from both sides, assuming one machine open per protected recipient, and is the closest thing to a figure comparable with your pre-2021 numbers.

On the worked example — 120,000 sent, 3,600 bounced, 116,400 delivered, 52,800 unique opens of which 29,040 were machines — those three readings are 45.36%, 20.41% and 27.20%. A dashboard reporting 45% is describing a send where roughly a quarter of observable recipients opened. The reported figure is not a small overstatement; it is nearly 1.7 times the honest estimate. Note the ordering, which is forced by the arithmetic rather than chosen: the lower bound always sits below the observable-audience rate, and the observable-audience rate can never exceed the reported rate. They coincide only when every delivered email was opened, or when there were no machine opens at all.

One more reconciliation the page handles quietly. Some tools divide by emails sent rather than emails delivered. The two differ by exactly the delivery rate: open rate on sent = open rate on delivered × delivery rate, because (U ÷ D) × (D ÷ Sent) cancels to U ÷ Sent. In the worked example the delivered-based 45.3608247423% and the delivery rate of 97% give exactly 44%, and both figures are shown so a discrepancy with another tool can be diagnosed rather than argued about. The practical conclusion of all of this: open rate stopped being a performance metric in September 2021 and became a deliverability diagnostic. Judge campaigns on clicks and conversions; use this page to understand what the open number is actually made of.

What is email open rate calculator?

Open rate is the share of delivered emails that registered at least one open. The numerator is unique opens — recipients who opened at least once, not total opens, which counts repeat views by the same person. The denominator is delivered, defined as emails sent minus hard and soft bounces. Both major platforms consulted here define it that way, so the page uses delivered throughout and reports the sent-based variant separately for reconciliation. An open is recorded when a remote tracking image loads, or when a link in the message is clicked; the click fallback exists because recipients who block images would otherwise never register. That mechanism has two failure modes pointing in opposite directions. It undercounts anyone who reads the message in a plain-text or image-blocking client without clicking. Since September 2021 it also massively overcounts anyone using Apple Mail with Mail Privacy Protection enabled, because Apple pre-fetches remote content for every message regardless of whether the recipient ever opens it. Neither failure is a bug in the calculation — the arithmetic is one division — and neither can be fixed by choosing a different formula. What can be done is what this page does: state which opens are machine opens, and show the rate with and without them. There is no standards body for email metrics and no audited definition; the platforms' own documentation is the authority, and where two platforms agree, as they do here, that agreement is the strongest evidence available.

How to use this calculator.

  1. Pull four numbers for the same send: emails sent, bounces, unique opens, and machine or bot-filtered opens.
  2. Use UNIQUE opens, not total opens. If your unique-open figure exceeds the emails delivered, you are looking at total opens and the calculator will reject it.
  3. Get the machine-open count from your platform's own bot-filtering or Apple-MPP report. If your platform does not break it out, enter 0 and read the reported figure as an upper bound — the page will not invent a number for you.
  4. Pick the headline you need. Reported is what to quote when comparing with your own dashboard; observable audience is what to quote when comparing with anything from before September 2021.
  5. Read the share-of-opens-that-were-machines output first. It tells you how much of the headline to believe before you look at the headline.
  6. Check the bounce rate. If open rate fell and bounce rate rose in the same period, the story is deliverability, not creative.
  7. If another tool disagrees with your open rate, compare against the 'if you divide by sent' output — that convention difference explains a gap of exactly the bounce rate's worth.
  8. Do not compare open rates across periods that straddle a change in your Apple Mail share, a change in your platform's bot filtering, or a change in denominator convention. Any of the three moves the number without anything about your audience changing.

The formula.

OR = U ⁄ D × 100 , D = Sent − Bounces ; OR_human = (U − M) ⁄ (D − M) × 100

Delivered is sent minus bounces, and every rate on this page divides by it. The reported open rate is unique opens ÷ delivered × 100: at the worked example's figures, 52,800 ÷ 116,400 = 45.3608247423%. The two adjustments differ only in what they do with the denominator. Removing machine opens from the numerator alone gives (52,800 − 29,040) ÷ 116,400 = 20.412371134%, which is a strict lower bound because protected recipients who genuinely opened were removed from the top while remaining at the bottom. Removing those recipients from the denominator as well gives 23,760 ÷ 87,360 = 27.1978021978%, an estimate of the open rate among the audience whose behaviour is still observable. Two orderings fall out of the algebra rather than being asserted. The lower bound is always below the observable-audience rate, because the same numerator is divided by a larger denominator. And the observable-audience rate can never exceed the reported rate: the difference between them works out to M × (D − U), which is zero or positive because delivered is never smaller than unique opens — so the two coincide exactly when every delivered email was opened, or when there were no machine opens. The delivery rate does double duty. It is a deliverability metric in its own right, and it is the exact conversion factor between the two denominator conventions: open rate on sent = open rate on delivered × delivery rate, because (U ÷ D) × (D ÷ Sent) cancels to U ÷ Sent. Here that chain runs (52,800 ÷ 116,400) × (116,400 ÷ 120,000) = 52,800 ÷ 120,000 = 44%. Multiplying the two ROUNDED outputs instead — 45.3608247423 × 0.97 — gives 43.999999998, which is why the sent-based figure is computed from the raw counts and not from the other output. On rounding stage: every intermediate value is carried at full arbitrary-precision decimal width, and rounding happens once, at the return boundary, to ten decimal places. No rate on this page is derived from another rate that has already been rounded — the sent-based figure is computed from the raw counts, not from the delivered-based figure times a rounded delivery rate. Three degenerate cases are handled explicitly rather than allowed to divide by zero: bounces equal to the whole send is rejected, machine opens equal to every delivered email is rejected because no observable audience would remain, and a send with zero opens returns a machine share of 0% rather than 0 ÷ 0.

A worked example.

Example

A retailer sends a promotion to 120,000 subscribers. 3,600 bounce, so 116,400 are delivered — a 97% delivery rate against a 3% bounce rate. The platform reports 52,800 unique opens, and its bot-filtering report attributes 29,040 of those to Apple Mail Privacy Protection. The dashboard headline is 52,800 ÷ 116,400 = 45.3608247423%. A 45% open rate reads like an unusually good send, and this is the number that ends up in the weekly summary. Now look at what it is made of. 29,040 of 52,800 opens — 55% of them — were machines pre-fetching a tracking pixel, not people reading an email. Apple's own documentation says Mail "downloads remote content in the background by default — regardless of whether you engage with the email," so those opens carry no information about the recipient at all. Strip them out of the numerator and leave every recipient in the denominator: 23,760 ÷ 116,400 = 20.412371134%. That is a floor, not an estimate, because every protected recipient who genuinely read the email has just been deleted along with the machines. Strip those recipients out of the denominator too — assuming one machine open per protected recipient — and the rate among the audience you can still observe is 23,760 ÷ 87,360 = 27.1978021978%. So the honest range for this send is roughly 20% to 27%, against a reported 45%. The reported figure is about 1.67 times the observable-audience estimate. Nothing here says the send performed badly; a 27% open rate among observable recipients is a decent result. It says that quoting 45% and comparing it against a pre-2021 benchmark, or against a list with a different Apple Mail share, is comparing two different measurements. One reconciliation to finish. If another tool divides by emails sent rather than delivered it will report 52,800 ÷ 120,000 = 44.00%. That is not a contradiction, it is the same measurement on a bigger denominator: (52,800 ÷ 116,400) × (116,400 ÷ 120,000) cancels to 52,800 ÷ 120,000, so the delivered-based rate multiplied by the 97% delivery rate is 44% exactly. When two tools disagree about an open rate, the denominator convention is the first place to look and the bounce rate is the size of the gap.

unique Opens52,800
mpp Opens29,040
bounces3,600
emails Sent120,000
open BasisexcludeMppAudience

Frequently asked questions.

Should open rate be divided by emails sent or emails delivered?
Delivered, on the evidence of the two platform definitions consulted here. Mailchimp: "the open rate is a percentage that tells you how many successfully delivered emails were opened by recipients." HubSpot: the "percentage of recipients who opened the email out of the number who received it." The logic is that a bounced email never had the chance to be opened, so including it in the denominator penalises the creative for a list-hygiene problem. The two conventions are related exactly: open rate on sent = open rate on delivered × delivery rate, since (U ÷ D) × (D ÷ Sent) cancels to U ÷ Sent. In the worked example the delivered-based rate of 45.3608247423% and the 97% delivery rate give 44.00% on sent. This page shows both so that a disagreement with another tool can be identified in one glance rather than debated.
How much does Apple Mail Privacy Protection inflate my open rate?
There is no universal answer and this page deliberately refuses to invent one. The inflation depends entirely on what share of your list reads mail in Apple Mail with the feature enabled, which varies enormously by audience, geography and B2B versus B2C. That is why the machine-open count is an input you supply from your own platform's bot-filtering report rather than a constant baked into the calculator. What is universal is the mechanism: Apple states that Mail "downloads remote content in the background by default — regardless of whether you engage with the email." In the worked example 55% of recorded opens were machines and the reported rate was about 1.67 times the observable-audience estimate, but that ratio is a property of that list, not a benchmark.
Which of the three adjusted figures should I actually report?
Report the observable-audience figure with the machine share beside it, and keep the reported figure available for continuity. The lower bound is useful for arguing a floor — it is the rate you can defend even if every single protected recipient ignored the email — but it is knowingly too low, so publishing it alone understates the team's work. The observable-audience figure is the closest comparable to a pre-2021 number, and its assumption is explicit and checkable: one machine open per protected recipient, and protected recipients behaving like everyone else. State the assumption when you publish the number. What you should not do is quote the reported figure against a benchmark from before September 2021.
Why can the observable-audience rate never be higher than the reported rate?
Because of what removing machine opens does to both parts of the fraction. Write U for unique opens, M for machine opens and D for delivered. The reported rate is U/D and the observable-audience rate is (U − M)/(D − M). Multiplying out, the reported rate minus the observable-audience rate has numerator M × (D − U), which cannot be negative because delivered is never smaller than unique opens. So the reported rate is always at least as large, and the two are equal only in two cases: no machine opens at all, or every delivered email opened. That is a structural property of the adjustment, not a coincidence of the example figures, and the calculator's boundary tests check it at exactly those two edges.
My open rate dropped. Is that a deliverability problem or a content problem?
Check the bounce rate and the delivery rate first, which is why both are on this page. A falling open rate accompanied by a rising bounce rate is a list-quality or reputation story, not a subject-line story. A falling open rate with a flat bounce rate and a flat machine-open share points at content, timing or list fatigue. A falling open rate with a rising machine-open share points at nothing at all — your list simply drifted towards Apple Mail. Any comparison across periods needs the machine share held roughly constant, otherwise you are measuring a change in your audience's mail clients rather than a change in their interest.
Is a click counted as an open?
On both platforms consulted here, yes. HubSpot states that "an email open is counted when the images in the email load, or when a recipient clicks on a link in the email," and Mailchimp describes factoring click-throughs into open rates for the same reason. The fallback exists because a recipient whose client blocks images would otherwise register as never having opened. It is a sensible correction for image blocking, and it is worth knowing about because it means your open count is not a pure pixel-load count and cannot be reconstructed from pixel requests alone. It also means a click-derived open is one of the few opens in your data that is definitely human.
What is a good email open rate?
This page prints no benchmark, and after September 2021 published ones should be treated with real suspicion. A benchmark is only usable if it discloses its denominator (delivered or sent), its numerator (unique or total opens), whether machine opens were filtered, and the Apple Mail share of the lists it was computed from. Almost none do. The worked example alone spans 20.41% to 45.36% for a single send depending on which of those choices you make — a range far wider than the gap between a good list and a poor one. Compare against your own sends with the same platform, the same filtering setting and a similar machine-open share, and treat clicks and conversions as the performance metrics.

References& sources.

  1. [1]Apple — "Mail Privacy Protection & Privacy" (Apple Legal, privacy data documentation). Verbatim: Mail "downloads remote content in the background by default — regardless of whether you engage with the email"; Protect Mail Activity "routes all remote content downloaded by Mail through two separate relays operated by different entities. The first knows your IP address, but not any third-party Mail content you receive. The second knows the remote Mail content you receive, but not your IP address." This is the primary authority for why a reported open rate overstates human engagement. Free, first-party. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  2. [2]Mailchimp Help — "About Open and Click Rates". Verbatim: "The open rate is a percentage that tells you how many successfully delivered emails were opened by recipients"; "The click rate is a percentage that tells you how many delivered emails registered at least 1 click"; and, on the distortion, "Bot activity such as Apple's Mail Privacy Protection (MPP) can falsely inflate open and click metrics." Official product documentation from a major measurement provider; free. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  3. [3]Mailchimp Help — "About Email Reports" (campaign statistics glossary). Verbatim: "Successful deliveries: The number of recipients who didn't hard or soft bounce on this email"; "Opened: The number of recipients who opened this email any number of times"; "Total opens: The total number of times the email was opened by recipients. This count includes multiple opens from individual recipients"; "Open rate: The percentage of successfully delivered emails that registered as an open." Establishes the delivered denominator and the unique-versus-total-opens distinction used on this page. Retrieved 2026-07-29.
  4. [4]HubSpot Knowledge Base — "Analyze your marketing email campaign performance". The second, independent authority used to check the denominator: open rate is the "percentage of recipients who opened the email out of the number who received it", click rate is measured against the same base, and click-through rate is measured against openers. Also confirms the tracking mechanism: "An email open is counted when the images in the email load, or when a recipient clicks on a link in the email." It agrees with Mailchimp on the denominator; the only difference is wording (recipients versus delivered emails), which coincide for a single send. Retrieved 2026-07-29.

Embed

Quanta Pro

Paid features are coming later.

  • All 762 calculators remain free
  • No billing is enabled
Coming soon